Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
I guess it depends on your definition of "a proper environment".I used to think I knew the answer to that. However.....now, I don't fucking know.
Course if I stopped doing a lot of things, it might make things better.....
I mean, there are arraigned marriages that happen all the time and people make it work..
So chime in RIU. Sarcasm, flaming, wisdom in any denominations, are welcome.
I know a lot of studies say that having the mother/father combo inside the household is what is best, and that's probably true (considering homosexual couples as well here, basically someone who represents the masculine and someone who represents the feminine characteristics), but that doesn't mean a single parent household wouldn't/couldn't be just as successful. IMO, it's far better to raise a kid in a single parent household if there are issues between both people. If that's the case, you just subject them to the issues. If you're a responsible sort of person, being single, the arguments would probably be pretty rare, as you don't see the other person all that much, and when you do it's only for a short period, so it shouldn't be too tough to keep your cool. I think society has certain bullshit standards people attempt to automatically conform to without even thinking about it, this is a perfect example.
Now why would it be better, in any logical sense, to keep a family unit together for the sake of raising a kid more efficiently if raising a kid in a broken family doesn't accomplish that goal?