You said it was stealing or theft (same thing), by definition (and no not the sneaky government changing in statutory laws, it from a dictionary) it is infact not stealing. Why, because not only is it legal for them to do so, they return the money (or tax) in the forms of services, such as defense, fire departments and schools. Just because you feel robbed, does not mean you have, by definition, been stolen from.
You say you will stand up by casting a vote? Okay when was the last time there was a reduction in government spending? Significant reduction trend or Drop in ANY tax?
In the 1990's the goverment reduced military spending wich lasted until we went to Afghanistan in 2001, and yes I have seen the GST (thats government sales tax, I live in the Yukon Territory, Canada) drop from 7% to 5%. Hows that for voting for change!
Not buying your rationalizations on the meaning or redefining of theft/taxation...here's why. You imply it's okay for them to take money against a persons will because they provide a "service" that a person does not or may not want. That doesn't add up, for it to be a service there must be a request for "service" by the payee. Barring the willful request, the payee, becomes the "extortee".
Some of the so called services I have seen lately....Felony charges for believing I own myself, threat of home stolen.
My friend is about to have her house stolen by them, for growing a plant. I don't want to pay for that "service". Defense ? They "return" the money by killing people I have nothing against in far away countries? Gee thanks government.
They "return" the money by forcing people to pay for schools they may not use or want? What if I don't want that kind of school and prefer to home school at my expense? Fire departments can be manned voluntarily or return to being operated similar to insurance companies like when they first came into being.
Using your method of providing a "service" I could really make some money. Hey lady your house needs painting, so I went ahead and painted it, I know you didn't authorize it, but now you owe me $10,000 dollars and if you don't pay me, I'll hurt you. Hmm, do you mean that kind of service?
Your use of "return the money" through "services" is again an attempt to JUSTIFY their action and sidesteps what has really occurred.
If I don't want their "services" and didn't agree to pay for them, but they take my money anyway through force or the threat of it, it cannot be anything but theft. By the way, would you like your house painted ?
Would you allow that the trend is towards an increase in the amount of taxation?