Chick-Fil-A

Kaendar · Aug 3, 2012

cannabineer said:
It does rather support my supposition that this is a troll page. cn

2easy is very serioius. He is just the first splash of a tidal wave of rights demanding perverts.

cannabineer · Aug 3, 2012

Kaendar said:
2easy is very serioius. He is just the first splash of a tidal wave of rights demanding perverts.

Mind your footing on that edge ... the curve is deceptive ... cn

2easy · Aug 3, 2012

im a rights demanding pervert lol

Kaendar · Aug 3, 2012

2easy said:
im a rights demanding pervert lol

Im not calling you a pervert, im just saying your way of thinking is what some will take all the way to the supreme court.

cannabineer · Aug 3, 2012

Kaendar said:
Im not calling you a pervert, im just saying your way of thinking is what some will take all the way to the supreme court.

Let's say they do ... do you really think the land's highest court is gonna suddenly countenance incest etc.? It's a self-cauterizing issue imo. cn

RyanTheRhino · Aug 3, 2012

Who cares why is this still a topic. When I want an opinion on how to make a better chicken sandwich i might listen, but for those who think Chick-fila has any say about politics is just ridiculous.

I hate to say it but the rest of you americans are just the drunk at a party looking for a fight. Drunk at a party looking for a fight while you should be studying for your exams.

And yes that was an economic reference.

Kaendar · Aug 3, 2012

cannabineer said:
Let's say they do ... do you really think the land's highest court is gonna suddenly countenance incest etc.? It's a self-cauterizing issue imo. cn

Some courts are already legalizing gay marriage, whats not to say in 50 years incestual marriage wont be the new gay marriage.

cannabineer · Aug 3, 2012

Kaendar said:
Some courts are already legalizing gay marriage, whats not to say in 50 years incestual marriage wont be the new gay marriage.

I think the trouble is that I see the basic moral divide between homosexuality (ok) and incest (not ok).
You see them as both on the same side of the divide (not ok).
So from your perspective, there's nothing to stay them from doing what you fear.
I would like to reassure you that many many Americans, almost all who accept homosexuality as ok, would balk at incest and bestiality. Make of that what you will. cn

cannabineer · Aug 3, 2012

RyanTheRhino said:
Who cares why is this still a topic. When I want an opinion on how to make a better chicken sandwich i might listen, but for those who think Chick-fila has any say about politics is just ridiculous.

I hate to say it but the rest of you Americans are just the drunk at a party looking for a fight. Drunk at a party looking for a fight while you should be studying for your exams.

And yes that was an economic reference.

I'll play UB's Advocate for a moment here ... the issue is that Chick-Fil-A also contribute money to anti-gay activist organizations. That makes it more than just academic ... real political consequence. cn

RyanTheRhino · Aug 3, 2012

cannabineer said:
I'll play UB's Advocate for a moment here ... the issue is that Chick-Fil-A also contribute money to anti-gay activist organizations. That makes it more than just academic ... real political consequence. cn

so let me be buck for a moment also.............. sources

So all the giant corporations that lobby you single out this one, why. This is a piss in the stadium urinal compared to the big dogs. How about the people who paid for Rick Santorum's campaign do you supouse thay are more ignorant and have more money.

ps: this is his go to because anything you type in to Google will give you a bias internet site making your point invalid.

also i love you cn :hug:

... i just think there is much more important shit to worry about.

cannabineer · Aug 3, 2012

RyanTheRhino said:
so let me be buck for a moment also.............. sources

ps: this is his go to because anything you type in to Google will give you a bias internet site making your point invalid.

UB actually provided a source for this when challenged. I believe it was this. cn

http://equalitymatters.org/factcheck/201207020001

UncleBuck · Aug 3, 2012

Kaendar said:
Once again, marriage isnt really a right, its a priviledge. Do you think an incestual couple should be able to get married?

OMFG are you comparing two consenting adults to incest now? was comparing gay marriage to dog fucking not enough for you?

srh88 · Aug 3, 2012

TheChosen said:
If we let gays merry, and then the incestuals as well, it's only a matter of time before a son and dad get married.

Thanks for saving us Kaendar.

if gays get merry itll prolly look a little like this

UncleBuck · Aug 3, 2012

Kaendar said:
See, this page perfectly proves the point I was making. It starts with homosexuals, but then all of the sudden other ppl start piggybacking on their new found rights and fathers are marrying their daughters and shit.

yeah, and then people start to fuck alpacas and demand that their alpaca love be legally recognized.

do you understand what consenting adults are?

cannabineer · Aug 3, 2012

UncleBuck said:
yeah, and then people start to fuck alpacas and demand that their alpaca love be legally recognized.

do you understand what consenting alpacas are?

I'll walk a mile for a camelid. cn

srh88 · Aug 3, 2012

UncleBuck said:
OMFG are you comparing two consenting adults to incest now? was comparing gay marriage to dog fucking not enough for you?

hes just trying as hard as he can not to be wrong

Kaendar · Aug 3, 2012

cannabineer said:
I think the trouble is that I see the basic moral divide between homosexuality (ok) and incest (not ok).
You see them as both on the same side of the divide (not ok).
So from your perspective, there's nothing to stay them from doing what you fear.
I would like to reassure you that many many Americans, almost all who accept homosexuality as ok, would balk at incest and bestiality. Make of that what you will. cn

Ok, but the way your thinking right now is the same way ppl were thinking 30 years ago, and here we are. Nobody ever thought gays could be married, no Americans wanted that. Its the same thing. In 20 years from now who knows what sick twisted shit will be openly accepted.

cannabineer · Aug 3, 2012

RyanTheRhino said:
so let me be buck for a moment also.............. sources

So all the giant corporations that lobby you single out this one, why. This is a piss in the stadium urinal compared to the big dogs. How about the people who paid for Rick Santorum's campaign do you supouse thay are more ignorant and have more money.

ps: this is his go to because anything you type in to Google will give you a bias internet site making your point invalid.

also i love you cn... i just think there is much more important shit to worry about.

I am still losing sleep over the great question: do bad cats go to doggie heaven? cn

UncleBuck · Aug 3, 2012

cannabineer said:
I'll play UB's Advocate for a moment here ... the issue is that Chick-Fil-A also contribute money to anti-gay activist organizations. That makes it more than just academic ... real political consequence. cn

i'll step in and say that the $5 million chick-fuck-gay drops on "kill the gays" organizations is a drop in the ocean in the grand scheme of things.

the chock-full-of-gay issue is good for one thing and one thing only: outing bigots.

RyanTheRhino · Aug 3, 2012

Invalid argument Site is bias and also a BLOG

I dont even think fox says its own name that much lol

Chick-Fil-A

Well-Known Member

Ursus marijanus

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Ursus marijanus

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Ursus marijanus

Ursus marijanus

Well-Known Member

Ursus marijanus

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Ursus marijanus

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Ursus marijanus

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member