The Worst President In U.S. History.

40acres

New Member
jackson was only a monster if you happened to be an indian. I am white, so I don't demonize him lik eI probably should.
 

Seamaiden

Well-Known Member
He also wanted to be rid of the electoral college, which I disagree with. Had we not devised the electoral college the states very well may not have united.

I agree with his ideas on banking, though. However, that simply cannot make up for his genocidal tendencies.
 

ViRedd

New Member
The modern-day Democratic Party is in favor of state supremacy and anti-Isreal/Jew ... as was Stalin ... as was Hitler.

Vi is there a diference between being anti-Israel and being anti-semitic, Or are you a anti-semite if you critisize Israels policies
If you were in support of Hamas, or recognizing them as a legitimate entity as Carter is doing, I'd say that you were an anti-semite. After all, Hamas wants to drive the Jews into the sea and elminate Jews from the earth. Or, am I missing something?

Vi
 

Seamaiden

Well-Known Member
No, you're not. However, while a lot of people may believe it is so, Israel is not synonymous with Jewish.

I used to be almost rabidly anti-Israeli. Their government has committed plenty of wrong, atrociously so. Then the Pallies voted in Hammas, whose members would kill their own mothers in the name of Islam. It's all "isms", all the way around.
 

Dankdude

Well-Known Member
I hate to Break it to you Vi, but George Walker Bush has surpassed Jimmy Carter as the worse President in US History. Bush is Ultra Arrogant and Ultra incompetent.

Vi also Med isn't completely wrong about Israel, They do just as much bad to the Palestinians as the Palestinians do to the Israelis. It's just that what happens to the Israelis gets more air time on the news..... Check out Link TV or Free Speech TV some time.... They show the News that the Networks don't handle.

Free Speech TV is Dish Network Channel 9415, Link TV is Dish Network Channel 9410...
Yes they are a little left leaning but, they are just as critical of Hillary and Obama as you are.
 

natrone23

Well-Known Member
If you were in support of Hamas, or recognizing them as a legitimate entity as Carter is doing, I'd say that you were an anti-semite. After all, Hamas wants to drive the Jews into the sea and elminate Jews from the earth. Or, am I missing something?

Vi
Do you think there is any possibility that may want a compromise?
 

natrone23

Well-Known Member
Did you know that many of the founding fathers of Israel were terrorists but they transitioned to a political entity, and did not use terrorism as a tactic for change anymore, since now they had somewhat of a an army.....................maybe their is chance that Hamas will follow the same path right Vi!
 

ViRedd

New Member
Did you know that many of the founding fathers of Israel were terrorists but they transitioned to a political entity, and did not use terrorism as a tactic for change anymore, since now they had somewhat of a an army.....................maybe their is chance that Hamas will follow the same path right Vi!
As for now, Hamas is a terrorist organization supported by Iran. Jimmy Carter is catering to both. Carter is way out in left field on this one. He is in defiance of the State Department and he is undermining our government in search of what? A legacy?

Carter is proof positive that liberalism, in its modern form, is a mental disorder. :blsmoke:

Vi
 

medicineman

New Member
As for now, Hamas is a terrorist organization supported by Iran. Jimmy Carter is catering to both. Carter is way out in left field on this one. He is in defiance of the State Department and he is undermining our government in search of what? A legacy?

Carter is proof positive that liberalism, in its modern form, is a mental disorder. :blsmoke:

Vi
Oh, and killing almost a million Iraqis and killing or mutilating 35,000+++ Americans is what, Supreme sanity? You are the one that is deranged!
 

hom36rown

Well-Known Member
Oh, and killing almost a million Iraqis and killing or mutilating 35,000+++ Americans is what, Supreme sanity? You are the one that is deranged!
Dont you see med, we are doing it for the love of the iraqis, to free them form their evil dictator...so we had to kill a few hundred thousand of them first, the ends justify the means right?
 

ViRedd

New Member
Yup, so was I. People like ViHole just don't get it. As long as they get a tax break, the Pres. can do no wrong. It is so sick, that venue of thinking, it is hard to comprehend. Lets go beat the bushes for commies.
And here we are with Med's uber-left wing, diversionary tactics again. The thread is about Jimmy Carter, not president Bush. :roll:

Vi

</IMG>
 

40acres

New Member
that's like sayn hitler was only bad if you were a jew...:mrgreen:
Okay, i will break down how history should be looked at. If anyone else has a degree in history, or is pursuing their masters in it, please speak up.

The difference between jackson and hitler, is that jackson did not change the way the government handled the natives. He followed the lead of the presidents before him. Regrettably, we know feel that that was the worng route, and will demonize him for it, Now.Jackson was a man of his times, and whether we feel with our modern day morals, that he was wrong, it was a different time.
Hitler altered everything and folowed nones example. I have stated before that if you want to make someone look bad, all you have to do is compare them to hitler. How about you give me any statesman, or president, or chancellor, and i can give you plenty of examples for you to hate them with YOUR MODERN DAY MORALITY AND VALUES. How about if you do anything, and i judge them 100 yrs form now agaisnt a backdrop of different values.
 
Top