Buck's Bogart: This is illegal

[UncleBuck]

While it is a style made popular by African Americans, as long as the law is enforced equally on white kids and others, I fail to see it as racist. Plenty of white kids running around with their ass showing.

so as long as it is enforced equally, it is not racist, even if the outcomes are completely lopsided?

I find it rather offensive for a dude to be walking by, when say I'm out with my daughter, and his ass is showing. I don't have a daughter, but if I did, that would offend me.

i can wear my pants three inches below my waist and you'd never see a thing, even if i was wearing a smaller shirt.

i find socks worn under flip flops to be offensive, should we start fining people for it?

there are already public indecency laws on the books if someone is literally walking down the street with their ass hanging out, by the way.

 

[schuylaar]

so as long as it is enforced equally, it is not racist, even if the outcomes are completely lopsided?



i can wear my pants three inches below my waist and you'd never see a thing, even if i was wearing a smaller shirt.

i find socks worn under flip flops to be offensive, should we start fining people for it?

there are already public indecency laws on the books if someone is literally walking down the street with their ass hanging out, by the way.

it's just pants that slouch and are held up by a belt and shorts cover butt..so there's nothing wrong with it..imo..personally it's kind of a pain in the ass to walk around with pants slouching..but women's skinny jeans are worse..i've seen more ass crack exposure than on any man's belted slouching..

 

[beenthere]

do you find either display of clothing to be offensive?

what kind of clothing offends you (if any) and would you go so far as to ban it, if any did?

these questions should apply to anyone wishing to get involved in this installment of buck's bogart.

i come in peace.

Who really cares, we have much bigger problems here in America.
Our president and liberal senate banned free market healthcare and gave us a federal government exchange for our troubles.
Maybe they'll ban our freedom to wear the clothes we want next and give us a federal clothing exchange and call it, Obamawear!

I'll come well armed.

 

[NoDrama]

Stupid law, but if you don't like it you can always just move. Dublin, Georgia has a population of less than 17,000 people. Small towns have some screwy laws, but most of them are not enforced unless someone calls and complains.

 

[Walnut]

so as long as it is enforced equally, it is not racist, even if the outcomes are completely lopsided?



i can wear my pants three inches below my waist and you'd never see a thing, even if i was wearing a smaller shirt.

i find socks worn under flip flops to be offensive, should we start fining people for it?

there are already public indecency laws on the books if someone is literally walking down the street with their ass hanging out, by the way.

I find no problems with a disparity of outcome, so long as enforcement is applied evenly, meaning persons of every group are just as likely to be fined if the are found to be in violation. Do you not understand how basing laws on their outcomes is equally as racist? If a group breaks the law more often, then the natural result is they will be caught more often.

We just need to be sure that enforcement is equally applied to all, long as it is disparity in outcomes ought not be considered.

The sandal analogy is false. Feet are not considered "private parts."

 

[schuylaar]

Who really cares, we have much bigger problems here in America.
Our president and liberal senate banned free market healthcare and gave us a federal government exchange for our troubles.
Maybe they'll ban our freedom to wear the clothes we want next and give us a federal clothing exchange and call it, Obamawear!

I'll come well armed.

..and the next 2016 republican hopeful is a bigger thug than tony sopprano..so heeeeeeeeey! fugggedaboutit!

 

[ginwilly]

Stupid law, but if you don't like it you can always just move. Dublin, Georgia has a population of less than 17,000 people. Small towns have some screwy laws, but most of them are not enforced unless someone calls and complains.

dublin GA is where I was sent last year to work with MU compliance.

I heard one of the cops in the ER saying it was a stupid law, criminals were much easier to catch when they had to hold their pants up to run.

The town was where I experienced my first DUI checkpoint, I was pissed. I had no idea that type of stuff was allowed. They also have something they call jump outs. About 4 cop cars will slide in front of a crowd at the same time, jump out of their cars and chase whoever runs. Someone always runs too they say.

It's also the home of Bronco's Demeryius Thomas, so it's got that going for it.

 

[UncleBuck]

I find no problems with a disparity of outcome, so long as enforcement is applied evenly, meaning persons of every group are just as likely to be fined if the are found to be in violation...If a group breaks the law more often, then the natural result is they will be caught more often.

so you are OK if 100% of those fined are black people who are not exposing their genitals, so long as it's simply possible that a white person gets the same fine even.

how do you argue that is fair with a straight face? that's clear racial targeting.

Do you not understand how basing laws on their outcomes is equally as racist?

so for example, say we have a drug law wherein crack cocaine is subject to massively lopsided and tougher sentences than regular cocaine. suppose we examine the effect this has and notice that we are sending a disproportionate amount of blacks to prison for long, mandatory minimum sentences, while whites generally get lower sentences without mandatory minimums.

would it be racist to point this out and correct it? or do you support laws like this which result in harsher sentences specifically pointed at blacks?

The sandal analogy is false. Feet are not considered "private parts."

i don't see any private parts.

do you see any private parts?

there are already public indecency laws that apply if someone is literally showing their private parts in public.

this is a racially targeted law which you support.

 

[UncleBuck]

Stupid law, but if you don't like it you can always just move. Dublin, Georgia has a population of less than 17,000 people. Small towns have some screwy laws, but most of them are not enforced unless someone calls and complains.

so people should be forced to uproot their existence because a bunch of racists decide to enact a racially targeted law?

are you sure that's how things work here in america?

 

[travisw]

Stupid law, but if you don't like it you can always just move. Dublin, Georgia has a population of less than 17,000 people. Small towns have some screwy laws, but most of them are not enforced unless someone calls and complains.

Lots of folks can't afford to just move.

 

[Pinworm]

are you sure that's how things work here in america?

[video=youtube;WLkRxVYdUko]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLkRxVYdUko[/video]

Come on NerDrama. Get with 'Merica!

 

[UncleBuck]

i'm trying to think of an equivalent racially targeted law against white people.

keurig coffee maker ban? netflix sin tax? prius prohibition?

someone help me here.

 

[woody333333]

i'm trying to think of an equivalent racially targeted law against white people.

keurig coffee maker ban? netflix sin tax? prius prohibition?

someone help me here.

is it racist to say this is a law against black people?........

 

[see4]

I give this panties filled thread 5 complete stars.

 

[BygonEra]

so as long as it is enforced equally, it is not racist, even if the outcomes are completely lopsided?

Uh... no. I'm assuming you disagree with that. So, if the outcomes are completely lopsided for ANY given crime, it's racist? That automatically means the law was implemented against black people? Good lord there are some sensitive people out there...

Are these facts also racist?

 

[UncleBuck]

Uh... no. I'm assuming you disagree with that. So, if the outcomes are completely lopsided for ANY given crime, it's racist? That automatically means the law was implemented against black people? Good lord there are some sensitive people out there...

Are these facts also racist?



View attachment 2968682

are you saying that black people are just naturally inclined to commit more crime or something? i don't get what you're trying to say here.

i was talking about a very specific law.

 

[nontheist]

i'm trying to think of an equivalent racially targeted law against white people.

keurig coffee maker ban? netflix sin tax? prius prohibition?

someone help me here.

By your logic all laws are openly racist towards white people since they're the majority. This is your argument yes?

 

[Pinworm]

i'm trying to think of an equivalent racially targeted law against white people.

keurig coffee maker ban? netflix sin tax? prius prohibition?

someone help me here.

No more corduroy pant-suits, or denim leotards.

 

[Pinworm]

By your logic all laws are openly racist towards white people since they're the majority. This is your argument yes?

Silence troll.

 

[UncleBuck]

removed

like i said, i am offended by socks worn under sandals. can we ban this, too?

and let's be real, you don't own a business. you live in a tiny apartment and post links from american renaissance, a white supremacy website.

of course you support this racially targeted law.