Another interesting pro-lifer conundrum.

canndo

Well-Known Member
last count, there are over 283 various chemicals found in the umbilical blood of newborns. some are teratogentic, some are carcentogenic, some are neurotoxins, some are endocrine disruptors, or substitte hormones. they were found in every example, not just the poor, not just the stupid.


Rich and poor alike have a vast assortment of biologicaly active and likely deleterious chemicals in their children's bloodstreams. They have been there since the onset of pregnancy.


now here is my issue. the anti-aboriton crowd is completely self righteous and near insurection over the killing of the innocent by moms and clnix and doctors but not one peep, not one utterance, nexot one indication of outrage over our gross poisoning of the unborn. where are the anti-abortion folks over this massive harm done to the unborn/ they claim to be so compassionate, so caring, so justified - to the point of changing constitutions, changing established court decisions in favor of the million or so dead fetuses - shame on us! we are killers! we are violating the little one's rights to life, they say.


yet, they have no problem with our litteraly pumping poisons into their bloodstreams from the moment of inception and there is no outrage over the millions of fetuses that are being systematicaly killed or maimed by these compounds.

i beleive that this is more than ample evidence that pro lifers have an entirely different agenda than protecting the "rights' of the unborn. If they were truely concenred they would be taking up arms against the source of these poisons and the speading of them to each and every unborn, who according to them have a right to life just as we born do. they show pictures of mutilated babies, preying on emotion but show nothing of deformations and eventual horrors as a result of these chemicals.


there are only two explainations for this situation. The pro lifers have no idea and are unwilling to examine, or they are actually more interested in contol over mothers and women than they are ver the health and safety of children.

this revelation shows quite clearly that pro life folk haen't a care for the preborn they profess to want to protect, as of course they have no say, no power, no in herent protection afforded other 'citizens'.

Pro lifers are disingenuous at the least, evil at the most.
 

burgertime2010

Well-Known Member
I am evil. It is funny, pro-lifers care so much about the preborn but once mom squeezes it out...fuck em. They pander to religious morons and are always the people who have 7 useless kids.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Not a single comment on my point - telling actually.
you didnt make a point.

you released a vapourous opinion which was laden with unsourced OPINIONS and then laid a moral judgement on those you view as "The Enemy", without a factual basis, and waitied for the cheers of approval.

all i can discern of your "point" is that anyone who disagrees with you on abortion/birthcontrol/politics should "put their money where their mouth is" and become amish subsistence farmers, submit to your views or be labeled as hypocrites.



the claimed presence of "chemicals" in umbilical cord blood is not proof of your moral and ethical correctness.
 

spandy

Well-Known Member
Pro-choicers never want to talk about the aftermath of their abortions either. Untold amounts of depression, anxiety, and some even blame abortions for their breast cancer. list goes on. It's like they assume that once the deed is done its peachy all over cause dammit how many threads has anyone ever scene on this fine forum about this stuff?

How many plastic bags do ya'll through to put this unwanted waste in? Geez people, think about the environment.

It's like they don't even care, cuz i ain't seen one thread about it and have not yet received one apology. Bastards.


What a conundrum.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Not a single comment on my point - telling actually.
Was that your writing, Canndo? Filled with misspellings and grammar errors, almost to the point of incomprehensibility.

I think your point is that "we" are poisoning fetuses and other innocent things, and "we" are supposed to do a full analytical analysis of the umbilical cords of newborns. Sounds like a bunch of enviro-wacko nonsense to me. Did this info come from Seralini by any chance?

This post comes to you from a pro-choice yet rational American.
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
Pro-choicers never want to talk about the aftermath of their abortions either. Untold amounts of depression, anxiety, and some even blame abortions for their breast cancer. list goes on. It's like they assume that once the deed is done its peachy all over cause dammit how many threads has anyone ever scene on this fine forum about this stuff?

How many plastic bags do ya'll through to put this unwanted waste in? Geez people, think about the environment.

It's like they don't even care, cuz i ain't seen one thread about it and have not yet received one apology. Bastards.


What a conundrum.

Somehow depression and anxiety of the mother = cancer and disease of the child. That is the best you can come up with?
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
Was that your writing, Canndo? Filled with misspellings and grammar errors, almost to the point of incomprehensibility.

I think your point is that "we" are poisoning fetuses and other innocent things, and "we" are supposed to do a full analytical analysis of the umbilical cords of newborns. Sounds like a bunch of enviro-wacko nonsense to me. Did this info come from Seralini by any chance?

This post comes to you from a pro-choice yet rational American.
My point is simple. (my errors are from my phone primarily, and as you know I do not spell well). If the "pro-life" faction were actually pro life, they would be concerned over the poisons in the environment that tend highly to endanger the life and health of that very "child" they seek to "save". If they were truely pro life they would at least show some outrage over the poisons that the mother is forced to ingest and thus pass on to her fetus - that thing they profess to be so concerned over.

I said nothing about other "innocent things".

You think that a total of 238 foreign chemicals in a human fetus is just enviro-wacko nonsense do you? They have found benzene in fetal blood of over 1 part per million, DDD, DDT (in children in the upper and lower latitudes), and hundreds of other chemicals. What would a pro-lifer say to a mother who drinks excessively? Smokes tobacco? smokes crack? but not a word about all these other things. If they were as concerned as they claim, they would be fighting to preserve the life and future of the unborn, yet they are not.


Why?
 
Top