Burn in Hell Fred

[BigNBushy]

Hate to jump your jumping UB, but this is a classic conservative denial mantra....I don't know a lot about it........I refuse to believe......if indeed that's what they were doing. The intellectual discuriosity is amazing.

If I were conversing with a normal person, my skepticism wouldn't be so high. But buck continually follows the glenn beck approach. He completely makes shit up to fill in gaps of things that are true, so that they look bad when indeed they are not.

Where do you get the idea that I'm conservative? I'm not one of those people that have a problem with homosexuals, and don't oppose gay marriage. I'm just fair in my criticism, and am willing to accept that the chic fil a guy could have given money to this group without knowledge that they were using it to kill gay people in Africa.

To which point, the link buck provided does the same shit he does.

It called something "demonstrably false" yet failed to demonstrate it, or even link to something that did. It simply said "that's false" and moved on, thus not having to address the point.

Also, it did not even describe the events in Africa, whatever they were, in a way that gave rise to bucks claims here.

Buck also failed to mention that this group recanted it's position, exodus international was a "pray away the gay" kind of group, which acknowledged in 2013 that they were incorrect, you can't pray away the gay. So it seems they are perfectly rational, well intentioned people from that alone, because from what buck said they could have kept up the sharade to keep the chic fil a money rolling in.

Anyway, the very noticeable lack of evidence in his own link proves to me what I suspected. Several little things in his point are indeed true. But he links them all together, like Glenn Beck would do, without a very good reason to correlate one act to the other.

So again, is there any evidence that the chic fil a guy gave money to these people to fund their activities in Africa, or was he doing what I have always heard he was doing, and writing checks with the express purpose of funding his "gay rehab" facilities here?

It was very convoluted set of actions in that article, and it doesn't look like the actual, official exodus international personelle acting on behalf of the same in Africa for the purpose of killing gay people, and what did they actually do there?

You see, buck would rather make the chic fil a guy look bad by posting vague information, than let the entire truth get out, because the entire truth probably isn't as damaging, if it is damaging at all.

 

[BigNBushy]

Ok, in further reading, some of the groups leaders did travel to Uganda in their official capacity as people involved with exodus international.

But it isn't for a purpose as nefarious as buck would have us believe.

Looks like they were invited as "experts in the area of homosexuality"

They spoke on their experience.

Not long after they expressed regret to having gone.

They did not help to draft the law. The law, once drafted did not provide for execution for homosexuals. Although, there were some nut jobs who did support killing them.

It was very much like what happens in our country all the time, where people speak before congress.

As I thought, buck greatly exaggerated their involvement, and way overstated their culpability and then went on to completely lie about the law and its outcome.

Now do you wonder why I refused to believe something simply because buck said it?

 

[schuylaar]

a calvinist dem?



*****, CR..awesome thread!

 

[MuyLocoNC]

Now do you wonder why I refused to believe something simply because buck said it?

Such is the modus operandi of our resident delusional schizophrenic with involuntary narcissistic rage. The content to his posts are 25% Democrat talking points, 70% hallucinatory conclusions that would take Carl Lewis to make the leap to and 5% cartoon memes. He is very much like a special needs kid, minus the kind nature, pleasant disposition and adorability.

 

[Rugxth]

• to the best of my knowledge.

  
  
  
  
  

 

[BigNBushy]

Such is the modus operandi of our resident delusional schizophrenic with involuntary narcissistic rage. The content to his posts are 25% Democrat talking points, 70% hallucinatory conclusions that would take Carl Lewis to make the leap to and 5% cartoon memes. He is very much like a special needs kid, minus the kind nature, pleasant disposition and adorability.

If he thinks of this stuff all on his own he is intelligent. If he is pulling it off a website somewhere, and actually believes it he is a moronic hack.

This is the same shit Glenn Beck does.

 

[desert dude]

Ok, in further reading, some of the groups leaders did travel to Uganda in their official capacity as people involved with exodus international.

But it isn't for a purpose as nefarious as buck would have us believe.

Looks like they were invited as "experts in the area of homosexuality"

They spoke on their experience.

Not long after they expressed regret to having gone.

They did not help to draft the law. The law, once drafted did not provide for execution for homosexuals. Although, there were some nut jobs who did support killing them.

It was very much like what happens in our country all the time, where people speak before congress.

As I thought, buck greatly exaggerated their involvement, and way overstated their culpability and then went on to completely lie about the law and its outcome.

Now do you wonder why I refused to believe something simply because buck said it?

Buck is a propagandist. Nobody should believe a single word he says, on any subject.

 

[Doer]

Burn in hell, huh? Suddenly religion will do if we feel really evil.

To me, it is the only reason hell was made up. Sure there is the fear of it. But, we all can get over that.

But, the Damning TO IT, such fun, right? HA HA

So, suddenly it is cool to believe in Hell. If I asked if you believe in Heaven......?

 

[schuylaar]

If I were conversing with a normal person, my skepticism wouldn't be so high. But buck continually follows the glenn beck approach. He completely makes shit up to fill in gaps of things that are true, so that they look bad when indeed they are not.

Where do you get the idea that I'm conservative? I'm not one of those people that have a problem with homosexuals, and don't oppose gay marriage. I'm just fair in my criticism, and am willing to accept that the chic fil a guy could have given money to this group without knowledge that they were using it to kill gay people in Africa.

To which point, the link buck provided does the same shit he does.

It called something "demonstrably false" yet failed to demonstrate it, or even link to something that did. It simply said "that's false" and moved on, thus not having to address the point.

Also, it did not even describe the events in Africa, whatever they were, in a way that gave rise to bucks claims here.

Buck also failed to mention that this group recanted it's position, exodus international was a "pray away the gay" kind of group, which acknowledged in 2013 that they were incorrect, you can't pray away the gay. So it seems they are perfectly rational, well intentioned people from that alone, because from what buck said they could have kept up the sharade to keep the chic fil a money rolling in.

Anyway, the very noticeable lack of evidence in his own link proves to me what I suspected. Several little things in his point are indeed true. But he links them all together, like Glenn Beck would do, without a very good reason to correlate one act to the other.

So again, is there any evidence that the chic fil a guy gave money to these people to fund their activities in Africa, or was he doing what I have always heard he was doing, and writing checks with the express purpose of funding his "gay rehab" facilities here?

It was very convoluted set of actions in that article, and it doesn't look like the actual, official exodus international personelle acting on behalf of the same in Africa for the purpose of killing gay people, and what did they actually do there?

You see, buck would rather make the chic fil a guy look bad by posting vague information, than let the entire truth get out, because the entire truth probably isn't as damaging, if it is damaging at all.

Ok, in further reading, some of the groups leaders did travel to Uganda in their official capacity as people involved with exodus international.

But it isn't for a purpose as nefarious as buck would have us believe.

Looks like they were invited as "experts in the area of homosexuality"

They spoke on their experience.

Not long after they expressed regret to having gone.

They did not help to draft the law. The law, once drafted did not provide for execution for homosexuals. Although, there were some nut jobs who did support killing them.

It was very much like what happens in our country all the time, where people speak before congress.

As I thought, buck greatly exaggerated their involvement, and way overstated their culpability and then went on to completely lie about the law and its outcome.

Now do you wonder why I refused to believe something simply because buck said it?

Such is the modus operandi of our resident delusional schizophrenic with involuntary narcissistic rage. The content to his posts are 25% Democrat talking points, 70% hallucinatory conclusions that would take Carl Lewis to make the leap to and 5% cartoon memes. He is very much like a special needs kid, minus the kind nature, pleasant disposition and adorability.

If he thinks of this stuff all on his own he is intelligent. If he is pulling it off a website somewhere, and actually believes it he is a moronic hack.

This is the same shit Glenn Beck does.

Buck is a propagandist. Nobody should believe a single word he says, on any subject.

i've never seen more people attack someone when that person is not around..as with you all.

why don't you save your comments for when he's here?

old men are worse than a bunch of women when it comes to gossip.

only small minded individuals gossip of others.

 

[schuylaar]

Fred Phelps is DEAD

another old, stinky white man is dead.

good riddance!

 

[Doer]

i've never seen more people attack someone when that person is not around..as with you all.

why don't you save your comments for when he's here?

old men are worse than a bunch of women when it comes to gossip.

only small minded individuals gossip of others.

You know, this is asynconous comms. A forum. I for one don't keep up with or comment on presence. The point is virtual presence, not actual, like a chat room.

In fact, in all my years of inventing and molding forum behavior, for a living, back even to modem and the BBs, I have never run across this one. No lie.

The concept itself is foreign to forum, as far as I know, these last 30 years. A forum is a blind dead drop of comment or question. It is meant to be less real time. Whereas begin present is the definition of a chat room.

You are are only forum clock watcher/attendance taker, I have ever seen out of 1000s of people. A very unique person, as I have said.

OTH, you know I agree with Ms. Roosevelt. The very worthy discussions are of ideas, not events, and certainly not people.

 

[MuyLocoNC]

i've never seen more people attack someone when that person is not around..as with you all.

why don't you save your comments for when he's here?

old men are worse than a bunch of women when it comes to gossip.

only small minded individuals gossip of others.

What are you yapping about? Who the fuck checks if someone is online before responding to a completely different person's post? UB is on far more often than I am, but I don't whine that he posted about me while I was away. Not to mention, you are a total hypocrite, just like ALL libs.

 

[potroastV2]

Well, that's just fine, Son! All liberals are hypocrites, huh? I guess that all non-progressives are complete idiots then, because only an idiot would not embrace progress.

 

[Doer]

Well, that's just fine, Son! All liberals are hypocrites, huh? I guess that all non-progressives are complete idiots then, because only an idiot would not embrace progress.

Progressives are Conservatives, may as well be. No Left left anymore. All talk and lies from both sides, to me.

I am a Middlearian where things get done.

 

[spandy]

i've never seen more people attack someone when that person is not around..as with you all.

why don't you save your comments for when he's here?

old men are worse than a bunch of women when it comes to gossip.

only small minded individuals gossip of others.

Oh shit, now we gotta see if the fucker is logged in to respond?

LOL, oh Im so glad I don't hang around you people as much these days, fucking ridiculous.

Good for a laugh, and that's about it.

 

[schuylaar]

You know, this is asynconous comms. A forum. I for one don't keep up with or comment on presence. The point is virtual presence, not actual, like a chat room.

In fact, in all my years of inventing and molding forum behavior, for a living, back even to modem and the BBs, I have never run across this one. No lie.

The concept itself is foreign to forum, as far as I know, these last 30 years. A forum is a blind dead drop of comment or question. It is meant to be less real time. Whereas begin present is the definition of a chat room.

You are are only forum clock watcher/attendance taker, I have ever seen out of 1000s of people. A very unique person, as I have said.

OTH, you know I agree with Ms. Roosevelt. The very worthy discussions are of ideas, not events, and certainly not people.

you are still mad because i proclaimed myself winner in debate..when you leave for a two hour break after actively exchanging messages the game is over..even chess has a time limit..isn't that why they use a chess clock?

 

[schuylaar]

Well, that's just fine, Son! All liberals are hypocrites, huh? I guess that all non-progressives are complete idiots then, because only an idiot would not embrace progress.

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to rollitup again<3

 

[schuylaar]

Oh shit, now we gotta see if the fucker is logged in to respond?

LOL, oh Im so glad I don't hang around you people as much these days, fucking ridiculous.

Good for a laugh, and that's about it.

that's not i said.

why does the right have such an issue with reading comprehension?..i said.."why don't you save your comments for when he's here?"

 

[UncleBuck]

that's not i said.

why does the right have such an issue with reading comprehension?..i said.."why don't you save your comments for when he's here?"

because if they say it while i'm here they know i run roughshod over their anuses.

 

[theexpress]

Well, that's just fine, Son! All liberals are hypocrites, huh? I guess that all non-progressives are complete idiots then, because only an idiot would not embrace progress.

u have grown to conservative with ur old age!!!!!! maybe thats why you erase alot of my posts... you should join me in the middle of the spectrum there is still plenty of room... BOTH LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES ARE FUCKING IDIOTS...