actually i stated explicitly that native americans are not outliers.
apparently you reading compensation has failed you?
Ah, so you did. Yes, I missed a word.
So then.. how is the statement that they are NOT outliers a problem? What kinda fucking dance is that?
so let me see if i have this right.
"they are not in the middle...they are average"
am i missing something here?
if i take the numbers 1 through 100, add them all up, and average them out, where does the average fall? in the middle? off to one side?
seriously, think before you speak.
Ohhhh, half-wit strawman math! Impressive. Lets recap what you said.
whites and asians are highest SES and underrepresented when it comes to rates of AIDS. blacks and hispanics are lower SES and most over represented. the small population of native americans are also low SES and somewhere in the middle.
Summary according to bucktard:
Whites/Asians - high SES, low infection rate.
Blacks/Hispanics - low SES, high infection rate.
Indians - low SES, 'somewhere in the middle' infection rate.
Except
The reality for infection rates goes, according to the CDC on the groups we are discussing here:
Whites/Asians - low, and serves as the baseline to compare other races.
Indians - lower than that of every one including mixed races, but higher than whites/asians. (no multiplier given, so I'm assuming it's pretty close)
Hispanics - 3x (closer to 4x) that of whites
Blacks - 8x that of whites
Looks to me like Hispanics are 'somewhere in the middle' and Indians are closer to the population average in the US which is, according to the 2010 census, 73% white.
Do you understand the meanings of "average" and "middle" in the context we are using now, jackass, or are you just going to keep playing dumb?
Further, the CDC claims that Indians have a lower infection rate than mixed races. So that must mean according to you, that mixed races have a lower SES than Indians? I seriously doubt it.
Your stance is full of holes, much like your head.
There is more to this disease than we currently understand. Get over it. It's not researchers being racist. It's Medical Science. They go where the answers lead them. Perhaps the Indians carry a similar gene? More research will only tell. That is, unless idiot fuckheads like you are going to protest it in the name of anti-racism and drag it on for another fucking 20 years.
Do you not want answers to be found? What kind of scumbag are you to deny medical research that could very well lead to a cure? Talk about low. If this was an 'engineered' virus (which I don't believe), you are no better than the ones who developed it. IMO, it'd make you worse. Congrats.