why would i approve of female circumcision?
ya know, you can actually answer my straightforward question. does the circumcised cock look disfigured and mutilated?
some of the vaccinations i got as a kid left me in agony and pain too. moot point.
Members may have suggested you approve of female general mutilation because it serves the same purposes as male genital mutilation, commonly called circumcision.
In male genutal mutulation the foreskin is removed.
In female genital mutilation it can go much further, infibulation, removal of the clitoral head. Specifically I am referring to the removed of labia or clitoral hood tissues in this instance.
The removal of the clitoral hood or labia can be directly compared to the removal of a patient's foreskin.
Almost universally the world has agreed that female genital mutilation is not acceptable, it is harmful and serves no purpose.
What does removing the foreskin accomplish? Very little. Cleaning is easier, but who is lazy enough not to clean behind their ears let alone their penis? Silly argument if that is used as a 'pro.' Other then that there is significant evidence that not having a foreskin reduced the likelyhood of acquiring many STIs, this is actually quite true. The foreskin is of course, skin, during high friction sex micro tears appear in the foreskin and increase the chances of STI transmission.
So. Removing part of a person's body without permission so that can have ONE benefit that could be nullified by using condoms is completely silly.