Fox news. enter at your own risk.

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
That isn't what you said though. I am not surprised that you don't understand how global warming is a problem since you disagree with the consensus among climate scientists regarding the vast body of research on climate change.

Just to clarify for you though, CO2 emissions are not symptoms of global warming, they are the primary cause.
Quote it then or stfu.

Must be difficult having such a useless brain.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Quote it then or stfu.

Must be difficult having such a useless brain.
I have quoted it repeatedly and UncleBuck did in this thread. You didn't say "CO2 emissions are symptomatic of a dependence on carbon based fuels", you may think that is what you meant to say, but it was not what you said.

CO2 emissions are not symptoms of global warming, they are the primary cause, ya dingus.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
PC thought police


I don't understand this expression. Did anyone ever say that it was illegal to be a racist shitstain? You can think what you want and I have never come across anyone who wants to abridge your right to be a bigot.

So why are you right wing blowhards so ashamed that you deny being racist shitstains, yet paradoxically decry what you perceive as an assault upon your to be what you all deny being?

Again, nobody is attempting to make it illegal to be a bigot.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
I have quoted it repeatedly and UncleBuck did in this thread. You didn't say "CO2 emissions are symptomatic of a dependence on carbon based fuels", you may think that is what you meant to say, but it was not what you said.

CO2 emissions are not symptoms of global warming, they are the primary cause, ya dingus.
I never said that, dumbass.

I said the problem is not the emissions but the source of the emissions, treating symptoms don't fix a problem.

Again, for a special Olympics level acedemic like you it must be difficult without crayons.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
I never said that, dumbass.

See post 76 of this thread to remind yourself of what you said.

It's not my fault you don't think global warming is a problem. Maybe you should familiarize yourself with the consensus among climate scientists regarding the vast body of research on climate change.

Just to clarify again for you, CO2 emissions are not symptoms of global warming, they are the primary cause, ya dingus.
 

heckler73

Well-Known Member
It's not my fault you don't think global warming is a problem.

If you are trying to convince him it is a problem, then it is your fault for failing to do so.
The burden of proof isn't on him. He can stand back and do nothing, to test his hypothesis.
Yours requires ACTION NOW!! !

There's quite a difference.

Maybe you should familiarize yourself with the consensus among climate scientists regarding the vast body of research on climate change.

Have you read any of Salby's textbook, yet?


Just to clarify again for you, CO2 emissions are not symptoms of global warming, they are the primary cause, ya dingus.
What experiment convinced you of that?
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
If you are trying to convince him it is a problem, then it is your fault for failing to do so.
The burden of proof isn't on him. He can stand back and do nothing, to test his hypothesis.
Yours requires ACTION NOW!! !

There's quite a difference.


Have you read any of Salby's textbook, yet?



What experiment convinced you of that?
That would be the consensus among climate scientists, the many international research academies, groups and associations, the dozens of government agencies from around the world, the IPCC and decades of peer-reviewed studies.

Sorry, but your conspiracy theories hold no weight and your apparent view that there is a dearth of evidence is sufficient to make you a target for ridicule.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
That would be the consensus among climate scientists, the many international research academies, groups and associations, the dozens of government agencies from around the world, the IPCC and decades of peer-reviewed studies.

Sorry, but your conspiracy theories hold no weight and your apparent view that there is a dearth of evidence is sufficient to make you a target for ridicule.
So do you outright refuse to admit the core problem is a technological dependence on carbon based fuels and emissions are a symptom of that dependence?
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
You're the one who thinks that CO2 emissions are a symptom of global warming, ya dingus.
And he would be 100% correct. Increased C02 emissions have always lagged years behind increased global temperatures. Always have, always will. Fat Al reversing that relationship for his little movie, doesn't negate decades of recorded SCIENCE!!

Please, please, please, make the argument that isn't the case.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
And he would be 100% correct. Increased C02 emissions have always lagged years behind increased global temperatures. Always have, always will. Fat Al reversing that relationship for his little movie, doesn't negate decades of recorded SCIENCE!!

Please, please, please, make the argument that isn't the case.
That's not what I said at all.

I said the only way to stop emissions was to solve our carbon dependence.

He's just being intentionally retarded.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
That's not what I said at all.

I said the only way to stop emissions was to solve our carbon dependence.

He's just being intentionally retarded.
We don't need less emissions, we need more emissions.

Ima go start up Big Hoss and let him idle for a couple hours in a show of solidarity with my fine, outstanding fellow stockholders of big oil.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
And he would be 100% correct. Increased C02 emissions have always lagged years behind increased global temperatures. Always have, always will. Fat Al reversing that relationship for his little movie, doesn't negate decades of recorded SCIENCE!!

Please, please, please, make the argument that isn't the case.
Citation required.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
Citation required.
Certainly, happy to oblige.

Please refer to ANY and ALL reference material on the subject printed before 2006. Although it started to become fashionable to ignore the fact around 1988, the loons didn't actually start flipping established graphs until Fat Al.
 
Top