Mars-Hydro overstates the capabilities of their lights. The light you mention draws 395w. Being generous, that all that power goes to the LEDs (not fans nor drivers), that would be 25w per sq ft. There is absolutely no way inefficient epi-whatever diodes will flower decently at that level. They need to be about 45w/sq ft in flower (30-35 works in veg). 55 works better.
Epi-whatever diodes aren't much better than CFLs in reflectors. At the low end, that light will cover 3x3 in flower (44w/sq ft).
Instead of buying more innefficient Mars-Hydro, I'd recommend rigging up some
Cree PAR38 spots/floods around the perimeter. They are relatively efficient. I've done very well at 21w/sq ft in flower. But, 25-30 would be better. If the Mars-Hydro covers 3x3 (9 sq ft) then you have 7 additional sq ft to cover a 4x4 (16 sq ft). At 30w sq ft, that would be 210w. The PAR38s are 18w. That's 11-12 lights. That would be a bit of work
rigging up the mounts. But, they'll come in handy for flexible, long-term sidelighting in the future (regardless of what you use as your primary source of light).
To be honest, a CMH would have been a better investment than Mars-Hydro. (Or, T5HO in a short space.). I hope it works out for you.