Have you owned a business/company?

kmog33

kmog33

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
No. 12 x $8 = $96....... 12 x $16 = $192
Click to expand...
Where did you get that from

1 X 12 vs 2 X 6?

The wage high is happening regardless, so that $15-16 isn't really negotiable or comparable.

So you will be paying $192 in the situation described regardless. You can either pay one employee or two. But either way you employees will be making at least the same amount as they did before wage increases.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
kmog33 said:
I live in Los Angeles where most markets are a little different, the housing market especially. I only have a good knowledge base here, as I have never have a fuck What happened with the market in Ohio. lol.

You're really not very smart as I can literally post off Zillow right now what houses cost in my area. And $242k doesn't buy anything. My tiny apartment by the beach when for over a million...

Hold up I'll get some number for you as you seem to think you can get a house for under $300k here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
You keep trying to pretend land next to LAX or beachfront is the norm.You can't do math at all, you are dishonest. I was offered a job in San Diego. $800,000 for a dump I wouldn't let my dog live in. I didn't take the job. I can buy the same dump here for $25,000 and make the same pay rate AND pay a whole lot less in taxes.
 
kmog33

kmog33

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
You keep trying to pretend land next to LAX or beachfront is the norm.You can't do math at all, you are dishonest. I was offered a job in San Diego. $800,000 for a dump I wouldn't let my dog live in. I didn't take the job. I can buy the same dump here for $25,000 and make the same pay rate AND pay a whole lot less in taxes.
Click to expand...
I am saying same houses in same area. Within a block of each other.

And that is my point when I said I don't think it should be a national base wage. But I do think there should be a minimum wage and it should be enough to live wherever your business is located.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
kmog33 said:
http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/5701-W-76th-St-Los-Angeles-CA-90045/20378759_zpid/

http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/7806-Beland-Ave-Los-Angeles-CA-90045/20382065_zpid/

http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/6645-W-87th-St-Los-Angeles-CA-90045/20389667_zpid/

These are current.



"
In 1970, the median sales price of a home in California was $24,300, and nationwide, $23,000. California and nationwide home price averages stayed fairly close together until the late 1970s."



http://www.city-data.com/county/Los_Angeles_County-CA.html


So what were you saying about housing prices not increasing that much?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Still trying to promote the same lie, then betray yourself with
"California and nationwide home price averages stayed fairly close together until the late 1970s."
 
kmog33

kmog33

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
Still trying to promote the same lie, then betray yourself with
"California and nationwide home price averages stayed fairly close together until the late 1970s."
Click to expand...
Housing inflation, as minimum wage increase, depends on supply and demand and the rate of increase/decrease in either.

In the past 2 years housing prices have gone up 30% here. So how does anything betray what I'm saying.

It was much cheaper to live in 1970 than it is now. It's more expensive now. I don't think I ever commented stating there was a fixed rate it goes up at lol. There isn't and min wage doesn't keep up. That's a lot of the problem.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
kmog33 said:
I am saying same houses in same area. Within a block of each other.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Now you are. Your original claim was "houses". Not any one particular subset. If you don't like the housing cost there (note I didn't say where you live, I suspect you live under an overpass) move somewhere else. Texas has high pay an low costs generally, for example.
 
kmog33

kmog33

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
Now you are. Your original claim was "houses". Not any one particular subset. If you don't like the housing cost there (note I didn't say where you live, I suspect you live under an overpass) move somewhere else. Texas has high pay an low costs generally, for example.
Click to expand...
Lol I have a house right by those posted. And a penthouse loft in downtown la.


Neither of which anyone could afford on minimum wage.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
kmog33 said:
Housing inflation, as minimum wage increase, depends on supply and demand and the rate of increase/decrease in either.

In the past 2 years housing prices have gone up 30% here. So how does anything betray what I'm saying.

It was much cheaper to live in 1970 than it is now. It's more expensive now. I don't think I ever commented stating there was a fixed rate it goes up at lol. There isn't and min wage doesn't keep up. That's a lot of the problem.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Housing depends on supply and demand. Minimum wage is by government edict.
Too stupid to see you are refuting your own statements, I see.
Average housing has gone up less than 400%. Minimum wage has gone up more than 400%. California taxes, due to libtards like you ate up the difference, and then some.
 
kmog33

kmog33

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
Now you are. Your original claim was "houses". Not any one particular subset. If you don't like the housing cost there (note I didn't say where you live, I suspect you live under an overpass) move somewhere else. Texas has high pay an low costs generally, for example.
Click to expand...
kmog33 said:
And a house that now costs $1.2million only costs $27k in 1979. What's your point?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
That was as much as I specified initially and I stand by that point. Lol.

I said that "a" house which specifies only one as far as I understand.

It was you who took that as a general statement she clearly I was speaking of a house/are in particular I knew about as I specified in the following post, because I have personal experience in a specific area in la.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
kmog33 said:
That was as much as I specified initially and I stand by that point. Lol.

I said that "a" house which specifies only one as far as I understand.

It was you who took that as a general statement she clearly I was speaking of a house/are in particular I knew about as I specified in the following post, because I have personal experience in a specific area in la.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
You were pretending "a house" represented all when you claimed "housing costs" have gone up. You're a liar, and stupid, too.
 
kmog33

kmog33

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
You were pretending "a house" represented all when you claimed "housing costs" have gone up. You're a liar, and stupid, too.
Click to expand...
No I was speaking about a house in my area that my fiancé's father bought in 1979. Vs the house I bought 2 years ago in the same area...

I was speaking from actual experience with the price differences.

Which I specified in the next post about it because your were very obviously confused.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Uncle Ben said:
If you got a 3.5% APR loan, you're on a roll.

If folks haven't taken this golden opportunity to buy real estate at record low rates with the benny of using someone else's money, they are losers (literally).

....and if you haven 't refinanced that 6.5% note by now........
Click to expand...
my APR is lower than yours, klanman.

LOL!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
The seller paid for my title insurance, I bought home insurance, a survey, and a home inspection. Not insuring the single largest asset most people own would be foolish.
Click to expand...
don't you rent some broken down dump?

https://www.rollitup.org/t/men-if-you-work-a-40-hour-work-week.758148/page-21#post-9910578

Red1966 said:
I am in the process of tearing down my grow operation and moving everything into storage. I need to get the landlord out here to fix the roof and the plumbing. So I should get my ass back to work. Later!
Click to expand...
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
kmog33 said:
You are an idiot.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
I see nothing to indicate you own the location you are photographing from. Or that you are even inside a building. Your complete inability to do even simple math indicates you have no clue
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top