Molasses?

I really hope not. Even if we disagree, we should be mature enough to just understand that we disagree. I am not actively burning either side of the bridge. I really hope the same for them.

Nope, no bridges burnt here, but I will be skipping right over your posts in the grow section from now on. You have no experience to go off of.

I've always gone after newbies that think they know what they're talking about. It's kinda my thing, keep the newbs in check.

So explain to me, the hangup/flaw in my logic instead of just telling me that I'm wrong. Where am I going wrong, if you understand exactly how it works?
Do you not understand that I have ran a side by side????? Wtf is wrong with you?
 
Nope, no bridges burnt here, but I will be skipping right over your posts in the grow section from now on. You have no experience to go off of.

I've always gone after newbies that think they know what they're talking about. It's kinda my thing, keep the newbs in check.


Do you not understand that I have ran a side by side????? Wtf is wrong with you?
I do know what I'm talking about. If you can't tell me why I'm wrong, why are you saying I'm wrong?
 
And, if you ran a side by side, did you run it to an excrutiatingly detailed degree? Did you run the same strain? What did you do? What was the result? Are there any reasons you might be wrong? Have you replicated it a second time to confirm, or did you only do it once?
 
I do know what I'm talking about. If you can't tell me why I'm wrong, why are you saying I'm wrong?
I'm not saying that molasses doesn't contain NPK values or that it doesn't feed the heard.


It's just not doing all the wonderful things you think it is doing.
And, if you ran a side by side, did you run it to an excrutiatingly detailed degree? Did you run the same strain? What did you do? What was the result? Are there any reasons you might be wrong? Have you replicated it a second time to confirm, or did you only do it once?
Run the test yourself man, I can't believe I've wasted this much time on this subject.
 
I'm not saying that molasses doesn't contain NPK values or that it doesn't feed the heard.


It's just not doing all the wonderful things you think it is doing.

Run the test yourself man, I can't believe I've wasted this much time on this subject.
What wonderful things do you think I think it's doing?
 
You got nothing bro, you read some shit and believe it to be true....

Like talking to a Christian all "prove God doesn't exist!"
 
i simply think, like anything else that contains potassium, that it's contributing to trichome growth due to its richness in potassium. Anything else that can be broken down by microbes that provide abundant potassium would be just as good.
 
You got nothing bro, you read some shit and believe it to be true....

Like talking to a Christian all "prove God doesn't exist!"
Dude, YOU have nothing, and I don't mean any disrespect. I've asked you to tell me how I've got nothing, and you can't. Don't you think it's possible that maybe you could be wrong? Even potentially? I may be wrong, too, but the science behind it is all adding up.

Christians explain things in miracles, I'm actually thoroughly explaining my shit.
 
So explain to me, the hangup/flaw in my logic instead of just telling me that I'm wrong. Where am I going wrong, if you understand exactly how it works?
well shit man, "since I understand exactly how it works..."
because you falsely attribute molasses/potassium to glandular trichome production.
 
Dude, YOU have nothing, and I don't mean any disrespect. I've asked you to tell me how I've got nothing, and you can't. Don't you think it's possible that maybe you could be wrong? Even potentially? I may be wrong, too, but the science behind it is all adding up.

Christians explain things in miracles, I'm actually thoroughly explaining my shit.
And real world experience is backing me up. I'm telling you what I've done and you haven't done a damn thing but read some shit.

I have said this over and over. I ran a side by side and could not really tell a difference. What more do you want?
 
And real world experience is backing me up. I'm telling you what I've done and you haven't done a damn thing but read some shit.

I have said this over and over. I ran a side by side and could not really tell a difference. What more do you want?
You just admitted you didn't run a second test, and you didn't bother explaining your parameters, so what you're saying backs you up doesn't, man. I really don't mean this in a condescending way. I'm being objective.
 
[QUOTE="Gary Goodson, post: 12858397, member: 885626

Run the test yourself man, I can't believe I've wasted this much time on this subject.[/QUOTE]
fuckin-A right, amen.

I am ignoring ODB from now on, I don't have time to educate selectively obtuse people.

if he believes its molasses doing ALL that fantastic stuff, just WAIT till he has a lockout issue.
 
Anything else that can be broken down by microbes that provide abundant potassium would be just as good.
I dunno, what's the nutrient content, and does it pose any problems with going rancid? I believe, as it's a plant, it can be composted like anything else. I dunno, though, I dunno what it's made of, fiber-wise.

1.00 cup
(170.00 grams)

folate34%

manganese28%

potassium15%

copper14%

fiber14%

magnesium10%

phosphorus9%

vitamin C8%

iron7%

vitamin B66%

beets.jpg
 
If there is no difference, then maybe it's just all genetics. But try running your plant without any potassium in flower and see how high your trichomes stack.
 
Back
Top