SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
Just gonna save that one for later...
"If you do not believe in climate change, you should not be allowed to hold public office"
- Thread starter Padawanbater2
- Start date
Signature
You mean too low on the ground? WTF
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Calm down buddy here's a trigger warning: Scientist disagree with you. Your yelling isn't going to help anything, only contributes to CO2. The significant detail is that noone was alive to "cause" the last one.
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
The other 99% of those holding relevant degrees and doing peer reviewed work in the field strenuously agree with my position here. But go ahead, believe the paid company shill if you want. It won't make you look a bit smarter.
We are here causing this one. Or do you think all that co2 from burning fossil fuels just magically dissipates? Derp.
You're rude, wildly wrong and offensive to anyone with a science background. Help the rest of us out and stop exhaling co2.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Scientists, thanks for catching the typo friend.
President of the world federation of scientists
President of the Commission for Climatology, World Meteorological Association
director of the Paris Institute of Global Physics
director of Space Research at the Academy of Science, Russia
chairman of the Science Committee, International Geologic Congress
the first woman with a PhD in Meteorology
president of the European Association of Science editors
Global Laureate 500 Meteorology
UNIPPC Japanese scientist environmental physical chemistry
NASA astronaut and physicist of apollo 7
Senior NASA Atmospheric Scientist and supervisor of James Hansen (alarmist)
director of Weather Satellite Service
head of Forecasting Center, Meteorology Institute in Norway
director of the Weather Satellite Service
directory of the National Climate center, Australia
President of the Center for Study of CO2 and Global Climate Change
director of the Institute of Antartic and Southern Ocean Studies
director of the Institute of Isotopic Geosciences, Netherlands
petition circulated by the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine included 31,072 scientists who content the issue of man made CO2 as a cause for climate change is unsettled. 9.021 of them were PhD's
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Come up with your own jokes, that's weak.
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
So fucking dumb.
Even looking into the first organisation on your list proves youre misrepresenting your point.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
behold the intelligence of the uneducated white male voter, which gave us president elect creepy bad touch, and attorney general jeff "i thought the KKK was alright until i found out they liked cannabis" sessions.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Behold the mentality about to take the reins of the greatest war machine ever assembled by "mankind".
Wars are NOT good for the economy!
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Someone's taking Russia?
Behold the alarmists that only concur with intergovernmental authority "science".
Fun game uncleBet.
Agw is great for economics.
Behold the alarmists that only concur with intergovernmental authority "science".
Fun game uncleBet.
Agw is great for economics.
squarepush3r
Well-Known Member
NOAA September Temperature Fraud
Posted on November 17, 2016 by tonyheller
NOAA claimed record heat in numerous locations is September, like these ones in Africa and the Middle East.
201609.gif (990×765)
This is a remarkable feat, given that they don’t have any actual thermometers in those regions. In fact, NOAA doesn’t have any thermometers on about half of the land surface.
201609.gif (990×765)
Satellite temperatures showed that September was close to normal in those regions which NOAA declared to be record hot.
ch_tlt_2016_09_anom_v03_3.png (730×450)
Not only is the land data fake, but much of the ocean data is fake too.
date: Wed Apr 15 14:29:03 2009
from: Phil Jones <p.jones@uea.ac.uk> subject: Re: Fwd: Re: contribution to RealClimate.org
to: Thomas Crowley <thomas.crowley@ed.ac.uk>
Tom,
The issue Ray alludes to is that in addition to the issue
of many more drifters providing measurements over the last
5-10 years, the measurements are coming in from places where we didn’t have much ship data in the past. For much of the SH between 40 and 60S the normals are mostly made up as there is very little ship data there.
Cheers
Phil
di2.nu/foia/foia2011/mail/2729.txt
The global surface temperature record is garbage. This is the 21st century, and it needs to be replaced by satellite temperatures which show little or no warming this century.
Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs
Posted on November 17, 2016 by tonyheller
NOAA claimed record heat in numerous locations is September, like these ones in Africa and the Middle East.
201609.gif (990×765)
This is a remarkable feat, given that they don’t have any actual thermometers in those regions. In fact, NOAA doesn’t have any thermometers on about half of the land surface.
201609.gif (990×765)
Satellite temperatures showed that September was close to normal in those regions which NOAA declared to be record hot.
ch_tlt_2016_09_anom_v03_3.png (730×450)
Not only is the land data fake, but much of the ocean data is fake too.
date: Wed Apr 15 14:29:03 2009
from: Phil Jones <p.jones@uea.ac.uk> subject: Re: Fwd: Re: contribution to RealClimate.org
to: Thomas Crowley <thomas.crowley@ed.ac.uk>
Tom,
The issue Ray alludes to is that in addition to the issue
of many more drifters providing measurements over the last
5-10 years, the measurements are coming in from places where we didn’t have much ship data in the past. For much of the SH between 40 and 60S the normals are mostly made up as there is very little ship data there.
Cheers
Phil
di2.nu/foia/foia2011/mail/2729.txt
The global surface temperature record is garbage. This is the 21st century, and it needs to be replaced by satellite temperatures which show little or no warming this century.
Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs
choomer
Well-Known Member
I thought that was a good observation as well.NOAA September Temperature Fraud
Posted on November 17, 2016 by tonyheller
NOAA claimed record heat in numerous locations is September, like these ones in Africa and the Middle East.
201609.gif (990×765)
This is a remarkable feat, given that they don’t have any actual thermometers in those regions. In fact, NOAA doesn’t have any thermometers on about half of the land surface.
201609.gif (990×765)
Satellite temperatures showed that September was close to normal in those regions which NOAA declared to be record hot.
ch_tlt_2016_09_anom_v03_3.png (730×450)
Not only is the land data fake, but much of the ocean data is fake too.
date: Wed Apr 15 14:29:03 2009
from: Phil Jones <p.jones@uea.ac.uk> subject: Re: Fwd: Re: contribution to RealClimate.org
to: Thomas Crowley <thomas.crowley@ed.ac.uk>
Tom,
The issue Ray alludes to is that in addition to the issue
of many more drifters providing measurements over the last
5-10 years, the measurements are coming in from places where we didn’t have much ship data in the past. For much of the SH between 40 and 60S the normals are mostly made up as there is very little ship data there.
Cheers
Phil
di2.nu/foia/foia2011/mail/2729.txt
The global surface temperature record is garbage. This is the 21st century, and it needs to be replaced by satellite temperatures which show little or no warming this century.
Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Everyone is alarmed by less than 50cm in a century and the science of weather climate change can possibly even be affected by, much less the actual significance of humans is still unsettled.
And yall are running around posting maps of what Florida looks like under water for an economic power grab using ancient religious scare tactics.
So sad.
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/336/6081/576.full.pdf+html
"Finally, our observations have implications for recent work on sea level rise. Earlier research used a kinematic approach to estimate upper bounds of 0.8 to 2.0 m for 21st-century sea level rise. In Greenland, this work assumed ice-sheet–wide doubling of glacier speeds (low-end scenario) or an order of magnitude increase in speeds (high-end scenario) from 2000 to 2010. Our wide sampling of actual 2000 to 2010 changes shows that glacier acceleration across the ice sheet remains far below these estimates, suggesting that sea level rise associated with Greenland glacier dynamics remains well below the low-end scenario (9.3 cm by 2100) at present. Continued acceleration, however, may cause sea level rise to approach the low-end limit by this century’s end. Our sampling of a large population of glaciers, many of which have sustained considerable thinning and retreat, suggests little potential for the type of widespread extreme (i.e., order of magnitude) acceleration represented in the high-end scenario (46.7 cm by 2100). Our result is consistent with findings from recent numerical flow models."
And yall are running around posting maps of what Florida looks like under water for an economic power grab using ancient religious scare tactics.
So sad.
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/336/6081/576.full.pdf+html
"Finally, our observations have implications for recent work on sea level rise. Earlier research used a kinematic approach to estimate upper bounds of 0.8 to 2.0 m for 21st-century sea level rise. In Greenland, this work assumed ice-sheet–wide doubling of glacier speeds (low-end scenario) or an order of magnitude increase in speeds (high-end scenario) from 2000 to 2010. Our wide sampling of actual 2000 to 2010 changes shows that glacier acceleration across the ice sheet remains far below these estimates, suggesting that sea level rise associated with Greenland glacier dynamics remains well below the low-end scenario (9.3 cm by 2100) at present. Continued acceleration, however, may cause sea level rise to approach the low-end limit by this century’s end. Our sampling of a large population of glaciers, many of which have sustained considerable thinning and retreat, suggests little potential for the type of widespread extreme (i.e., order of magnitude) acceleration represented in the high-end scenario (46.7 cm by 2100). Our result is consistent with findings from recent numerical flow models."
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Translation: I don't understand what this is all about but it's got graphs and shit so I'll post it.NOAA September Temperature Fraud
Posted on November 17, 2016 by tonyheller
NOAA claimed record heat in numerous locations is September, like these ones in Africa and the Middle East.
201609.gif (990×765)
This is a remarkable feat, given that they don’t have any actual thermometers in those regions. In fact, NOAA doesn’t have any thermometers on about half of the land surface.
201609.gif (990×765)
Satellite temperatures showed that September was close to normal in those regions which NOAA declared to be record hot.
ch_tlt_2016_09_anom_v03_3.png (730×450)
Not only is the land data fake, but much of the ocean data is fake too.
date: Wed Apr 15 14:29:03 2009
from: Phil Jones <p.jones@uea.ac.uk> subject: Re: Fwd: Re: contribution to RealClimate.org
to: Thomas Crowley <thomas.crowley@ed.ac.uk>
Tom,
The issue Ray alludes to is that in addition to the issue
of many more drifters providing measurements over the last
5-10 years, the measurements are coming in from places where we didn’t have much ship data in the past. For much of the SH between 40 and 60S the normals are mostly made up as there is very little ship data there.
Cheers
Phil
di2.nu/foia/foia2011/mail/2729.txt
The global surface temperature record is garbage. This is the 21st century, and it needs to be replaced by satellite temperatures which show little or no warming this century.
Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs
squarepush3r
Well-Known Member
In one picture: why you shouldn’t get your climate information from the @dailykos
Anthony Watts / 1 day ago November 29, 2016
From the department of photoshopped bipolar behavior comes this hilarious photograph that accompanies a headline of doom from the leftist cesspool known as the Daily Kos.
It just doesn’t get any better than this from the Kos kids. Thank you for making life entertaining with this epic failure.
Tom Nelson spotted it and wrote in a tweet:
In article about the Arctic, @dailykos puts a photoshopped penguin on the “Ursus Bogus” iceberg, attribution NCAR! https://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/05/12/new-bear-species-discovered-ursus-
It’s the same fake ice floe that caught out Science magazine a few years ago with the polar bear photoshopped in:
You can get one with a Penguin (or three) from the photo library, as seen below:
If you like the background it is also available with one penguin:
Or three penguins:
But you just have to remember one very important detail before using it:
Penguins don’t live at the North Pole or the Arctic!
Anthony Watts / 1 day ago November 29, 2016
From the department of photoshopped bipolar behavior comes this hilarious photograph that accompanies a headline of doom from the leftist cesspool known as the Daily Kos.
It just doesn’t get any better than this from the Kos kids. Thank you for making life entertaining with this epic failure.
Tom Nelson spotted it and wrote in a tweet:
In article about the Arctic, @dailykos puts a photoshopped penguin on the “Ursus Bogus” iceberg, attribution NCAR! https://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/05/12/new-bear-species-discovered-ursus-
It’s the same fake ice floe that caught out Science magazine a few years ago with the polar bear photoshopped in:
You can get one with a Penguin (or three) from the photo library, as seen below:
If you like the background it is also available with one penguin:
Or three penguins:
But you just have to remember one very important detail before using it:
Penguins don’t live at the North Pole or the Arctic!
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Oh....my.....god! You mean that science deniers now have competition in putting out fake news??????In one picture: why you shouldn’t get your climate information from the @dailykos
Anthony Watts / 1 day ago November 29, 2016
From the department of photoshopped bipolar behavior comes this hilarious photograph that accompanies a headline of doom from the leftist cesspool known as the Daily Kos.
It just doesn’t get any better than this from the Kos kids. Thank you for making life entertaining with this epic failure.
Tom Nelson spotted it and wrote in a tweet:
In article about the Arctic, @dailykos puts a photoshopped penguin on the “Ursus Bogus” iceberg, attribution NCAR! https://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/05/12/new-bear-species-discovered-ursus-
It’s the same fake ice floe that caught out Science magazine a few years ago with the polar bear photoshopped in:
You can get one with a Penguin (or three) from the photo library, as seen below:
If you like the background it is also available with one penguin:
Or three penguins:
But you just have to remember one very important detail before using it:
Penguins don’t live at the North Pole or the Arctic!
Those damn people who support science and want to work with the rest of the world to prevent global warming. How could they?
That said pretty funny that science deniers are in such a dither over an image that is fake but the message behind that image is real. What they put out is altogether fake.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
97% of scientist agree that their careers and their funding depend on a 97% consensus.