Superdelegates in the Democratic Party (Primary) should be eliminated

[dagwood45431]

You don't understand that you're misusing the label, do you?

Show me your definition of Appeal to Authority. You'll have to bastardize the fuck out of it to make it NOT fit what the fuck you're doing, jackass. Let's see it.

 

[dagwood45431]

My argument isn't appealing to Chomsky's authority. An appeal to authority would be saying Chomsky's argument is correct because Chomsky said it. That's not why Chomsky's argument is correct. His argument is correct based on the verifiable evidence.

LMFAO! For real! Usually this circular shit wears me out quickly but this is fun! Wheeeee!

You should look into some critical thinking/logic night school classes or something.

 

[Padawanbater2]

800,000 voters in washington state. clinton wins 56-44. bernie takes 74 delegates, clinton gets 27.

go ahead and keep willfully ignoring this because it destroys your phony conspiracy theory

How does the Washington vote erase the fact that Clinton controlled the DNC before the primary began?

 

[dagwood45431]

How does the Washington vote erase the fact that Clinton controlled the DNC before the primary began?

Whee!

 

[UncleBuck]

How does the Washington vote erase the fact that Clinton controlled the DNC before the primary began?

so clinton controlled the DNC so well that she lost herself 47 delegates in a state she won by 12 points. got it.

RIGGED

 

[Padawanbater2]

so clinton controlled the DNC so well that she lost herself 47 delegates in a state she won by 12 points. got it.

RIGGED

Did Clinton buy the DNC before the Democratic primary?

 

[Fogdog]

My citations that you call strange support my perspectives. If you can't see the relevance, maybe that's down too your biases, not mine.

Even negative publicity is better than none.

Want proof? Look at Roy Moore. I'm being he's gonna win, at least in part BECAUSE of all that negative publicity!

Your 'rabid misogynists' claim is yet another attempt to gain support by saying something untrue and wildly off topic. Lame clown sauce that wouldn't stand for a second in any real debate.

LOL

Moore was a shoe in before the bad press happened. This is the perfect example of how you fabricate whatever falsehoods you like to support your false narrative.

 

[SneekyNinja]

Did Clinton buy the DNC before the Democratic primary?

Watching you trying to formulate a logical thought is like watching Canadian recording artist Drake trying to dance...

It's embarrassing but impossible to stop watching.

 

[Padawanbater2]

Watching you trying to formulate a logical thought is like watching Canadian recording artist Drake trying to dance...

It's embarrassing but impossible to stop watching.

Clinton did buy the DNC before the Democratic primary. The answer is yes. That means the primary was rigged. By virtue of buying the DNC, you are effectively rigging the primary. The Washington vote is irrelevant to that fact.

 

[UncleBuck]

Clinton did buy the DNC before the Democratic primary. The answer is yes. That means the primary was rigged. By virtue of buying the DNC, you are effectively rigging the primary. The Washington vote is irrelevant to that fact.

if they rigged the primaries, why did she lose delegates in states where she got more votes?

that's just absurd.

 

[SneekyNinja]

Clinton did buy the DNC before the Democratic primary. The answer is yes. That means the primary was rigged. By virtue of buying the DNC, you are effectively rigging the primary. The Washington vote is irrelevant to that fact.

 

[Fogdog]

Clinton did buy the DNC before the Democratic primary. The answer is yes. That means the primary was rigged. By virtue of buying the DNC, you are effectively rigging the primary. The Washington vote is irrelevant to that fact.

no she didn't.

The primary wasn't rigged either.

Groundhog day.

 

[Padawanbater2]

no she didn't.

You deny the joint fundraising agreement between Clinton and the DNC that gave her campaign control over areas of the election the DNC bylaws explicitly require neutrality?

 

[Fogdog]

You deny the joint fundraising agreement between Clinton and the DNC that gave her campaign control over areas of the election the DNC bylaws explicitly require neutrality?

I deny that Clinton bought the DNC

 

[ttystikk]

My argument isn't appealing to Chomsky's authority. An appeal to authority would be saying Chomsky's argument is correct because Chomsky said it. That's not why Chomsky's argument is correct. His argument is correct based on the verifiable evidence.

He doesn't understand the appeal to authority fallacy to begin with.

And he doesn't care. He's just bloviating to respond, going no one will notice his own logical shortcomings.

We're right. They're on the side of the corporatist 'opposition', which means they're used to cognitive dissonance. By now, it must feel as normal to them as voting for rich people who screw them over must feel to poor Republicans.

 

[Padawanbater2]

I deny that Clinton bought the DNC

"[the JFA] specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party's finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff."

 

[ttystikk]

800,000 voters in washington state. clinton wins 56-44. bernie takes 74 delegates, clinton gets 27.

go ahead and keep willfully ignoring this because it destroys your phony conspiracy theory

Well, I was waiting for this. You're such an idiot; you posted numbers from a non binding poll that happened on May 24, 2016- almost months AFTER the binding caucus vote held on March 26, 2016.

And you conveniently ignore the fact that every one of the unpledged delegates voted for Clinton anyway.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Democratic_caucuses,_2016

It's all there, under the 'results' tab. You are really bad at this kind of disinformation.

So much for 'phony', idiot. The only phony here is you.

 

[ttystikk]

LMFAO! For real! Usually this circular shit wears me out quickly but this is fun! Wheeeee!

You should look into some critical thinking/logic night school classes or something.

You're one to talk.

 

[ttystikk]

How does the Washington vote erase the fact that Clinton controlled the DNC before the primary began?

Not only is it not relevant, but Buckwit got his facts wrong. It's starting to look like a habit with him.

 

[ttystikk]

so clinton controlled the DNC so well that she lost herself 47 delegates in a state she won by 12 points. got it.

RIGGED

This is a lie. But nice try. I just thought I'd let you post this lie enough times that you hang yourself with it.