Superdelegates in the Democratic Party (Primary) should be eliminated

Superdelegates in the Democratic Party (Primary) should be eliminated

  • I agree. I oppose Superdelagates

  • I disagree. I support Superdelegates


Results are only viewable after voting.

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
you accused me of having my facts wrong and said i do it often. so i pointed out that you get your facts wrong in embarrassing ways far more often.

i didn;t even get any facts wrong though. when 800,000 people in washington state voted, they chose clinton. but bernie got all the delegates because rigged.
You have yet to provide any proof at all of the 'sarin gas attack'.

No, Bernie won the vote. 800,000 people showed up for a non binding primary later. I know you hate facts that don't fit your desired view of reality, but twisting them up and passing off the manufactured results just makes you a Republican wannabe.

Kinda like the rest of the Democratic Party.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
You spent months crying about name-calling and now you show up in my alerts to call me names on a post that wasn't even responding to you...

Here's how bernie can still win?
Squirrel! I know you can't win on the merits of the topic, so distraction is apparently the best you can manage.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
win on the merits of the topic
The only person on the entire site who actually agrees with you on this will be Padaraper. Anyone else who clicks 'like' is only doing so because I have also hurt their feelbads. I bet you won't even understand how the following five words completely destroy your fallacy:

The topic has no merit.

That won't stop you from spewing some little bernout soundbite that you regularly recycle when you've got nothing original to say to one of the most original people on this site. In fact, the only time you have ever posted anything interesting, was during that tiny little short period when parroting bernout propaganda was cool, back in 2015.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
She kept it out of bankruptcy in exchange for control.

You're splitting hairs again.
Bernie had so much freedom of movement inside the DNC that one of his IT guys hacked through a firewall and stole Clintons files. He used DNC infrastructure and didn't pay for any of it. In November, 2015, Bernie cut an agreement to conduct joint fundraising with the DNC that would have helped pay for the services he was taking advantage of. He never did honor that agreement.

Clinton kept the DNC running for everybody, including Sanders but also every state's Democratic party had access.

In light of how badly managed the DNC had been before Clinton saved it, it only makes sense that she maintained control of how her campaign's money was spent. Not an insignificant amount was spent to benefit others including her feckless rival who did not honor his agreements, leeched DNC resources, hacked into her proprietary database and used it all to his own advantage without regard for how it was available in the first place.

Can you at least give me a hypocrite for my bingo card in exchange for my giving you a coherent reply? I don't expect a coherent one back from you but at least you could give me a hypocrite.

Yes, I'm mocking you.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Bernie had so much freedom of movement inside the DNC that one of his IT guys hacked through a firewall and stole Clintons files. He used DNC infrastructure and didn't pay for any of it. In November, 2015, Bernie cut an agreement to conduct joint fundraising with the DNC that would have helped pay for the services he was taking advantage of. He never did honor that agreement.

Clinton kept the DNC running for everybody, including Sanders but also every state's Democratic party had access.

In light of how badly managed the DNC had been before Clinton saved it, it only makes sense that she maintained control of how her campaign's money was spent. Not an insignificant amount was spent to benefit others including her feckless rival who did not honor his agreements, leeched DNC resources, hacked into her proprietary database and used it all to his own advantage without regard for how it was available in the first place.

Can you at least give me a hypocrite for my bingo card in exchange for my giving you a coherent reply? I don't expect a coherent one back from you but at least you could give me a hypocrite.

Yes, I'm mocking you.
Doing the same thing and expecting different results is potato.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
The only person on the entire site who actually agrees with you on this will be Padaraper. Anyone else who clicks 'like' is only doing so because I have also hurt their feelbads. I bet you won't even understand how the following five words completely destroy your fallacy:

The topic has no merit.

That won't stop you from spewing some little bernout soundbite that you regularly recycle when you've got nothing original to say to one of the most original people on this site. In fact, the only time you have ever posted anything interesting, was during that tiny little short period when parroting bernout propaganda was cool, back in 2015.
Yet here you are, taking time out from your great life in the South Pacific to shitpost.

Either you're lying about your life, you have a really bad sense of time management or the topic means something.

Hypocrite.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Bernie had so much freedom of movement inside the DNC that one of his IT guys hacked through a firewall and stole Clintons files. He used DNC infrastructure and didn't pay for any of it. In November, 2015, Bernie cut an agreement to conduct joint fundraising with the DNC that would have helped pay for the services he was taking advantage of. He never did honor that agreement.

Clinton kept the DNC running for everybody, including Sanders but also every state's Democratic party had access.

In light of how badly managed the DNC had been before Clinton saved it, it only makes sense that she maintained control of how her campaign's money was spent. Not an insignificant amount was spent to benefit others including her feckless rival who did not honor his agreements, leeched DNC resources, hacked into her proprietary database and used it all to his own advantage without regard for how it was available in the first place.

Can you at least give me a hypocrite for my bingo card in exchange for my giving you a coherent reply? I don't expect a coherent one back from you but at least you could give me a hypocrite.

Yes, I'm mocking you.
Jesus, twisting the facts into pretzels is not the same as winning an argument.

They discovered the firewall was down and notified the DNC staff, stupid.

But keep on misrepresentin'!
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Jesus, twisting the facts into pretzels is not the same as winning an argument.

They discovered the firewall was down and notified the DNC staff, stupid.

But keep on misrepresentin'!
Just laying out the facts. I know you can't understand them but I'll keep lobbing them your way.
 
Last edited:

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Just laying out the facts. I know you can't understand them but I'll keep lobbing them your way.

On a different topic, are you making any progress in learning how to accurately count to twelve?
Clinton 'saved' the DNC specifically for her own use and aggrandizement, but spin it any way you want.

It's only our democracy at stake.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
Jesus, twisting the facts into pretzels is not the same as winning an argument.

They discovered the firewall was down and notified the DNC staff, stupid.

But keep on misrepresentin'!
No they discovered that accounts had the wrong access permissions.

And yes, the files were downloaded by the Sanders team the logs seemed to indicate.

A firewall is for restricting network traffic and wouldn't be how you'd restrict seperate accounts on the same server, it's just unnecessary.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Yet here you are, taking time out from your great life in the South Pacific to shitpost.

Either you're lying about your life, you have a really bad sense of time management or the topic means something.

Hypocrite.
I'm on a bus, using my smartphone. At any moment my signal could go from slow to nonexistent. Yet somehow, I am able to post a few words that makes you continue your meltdown into the wee hours. What time is it Colorado now anyway? Put the pizo down, you go-getter you.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
No they discovered that accounts had the wrong access permissions.

And yes, the files were downloaded by the Sanders team the logs seemed to indicate.

A firewall is for restricting network traffic and wouldn't be how you'd restrict seperate accounts on the same server, it's just unnecessary.
I'm quoting the news sources that discussed the issue; I don't claim expertise.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
I'm on a bus, using my smartphone. At any moment my signal could go from slow to nonexistent. Yet somehow, I am able to post a few words that makes you continue your meltdown into the wee hours. What time is it Colorado now anyway? Put the pizo down, you go-getter you.
My meltdown? Here you are, clown.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Jesus, twisting the facts into pretzels is not the same as winning an argument.

They discovered the firewall was down and notified the DNC staff, stupid.

But keep on misrepresentin'!
So, here we have your acknowlegement that Sanders was given -- without any payment on his part -- free access to DNC infrastructure to the point where his IT guy was able to find internal security issues. You have acknowledged that Sanders was given freedom to use DNC systems, download shared data (not Clinton's campaign's proprietary database) as was called for in the DNC charter.

You also said that Clinton prevented DNC bankruptcy.

Everything else you and pad claim is based upon a perception of impropriety. Yet I've never heard anybody from Sanders campaign or Sanders himself or any reputable third party say that he wasn't given fair treatment by the DNC much less sabotaged by it as your claim of rigged implies..
 
Last edited:
Top