I don't like racists. So, I'm not defending the choices they make in the sense that I like those choices.
I'm defending their right to control themselves and their own justly acquired property. They are two different things, which you conveniently ignore, "anarchist" .
it seems like you think stepping onto a piece of privately owned property makes you a sovereign state...whether you own the property or not, the same rules apply on it, as off of it. you can't murder people just because they're on your property. you can't build anything you want, without getting permits, and if what you want to build isn't allowed, guess what? you can't build it..
this whole "coercion based government" thing is ridiculous. you can call it that, but the government doesn't really need to use coercion. they have "rules and regulations"....you follow them like everyone else, or you pay the consequences. you may call that coercion...but the rest of us do not. coercion is using force to get someone to do what you want them to do. rules and regulations require people to act responsibly, with as little impact on others as possible....you never seem to take that last part into account...."as little impact on others as possible".....the things you do effect other people...that's why many stupid things aren't allowed...because you doing something incredibly stupid has repercussions not only for you, but anyone near you....you burning your trash instead of taking it to the landfill makes the whole area downwind of you stink, and can possibly cause fires....so it's not allowed, even though you don't see the harm in it....you not having a proper septic tank set up spreads your filth into the ground water, and downstream of any running water in the area...so it's not allowed....is it really "coercion" when the goal is to keep idiots from fucking up other peoples lives?