Holie214
Member
It's my first grow so I don't have much to compare it to. I'm into my first week a flowing now.
Attachments
-
2.7 MB Views: 124
-
3.9 MB Views: 124
They look much much better there. Nice grow.It's my first grow so I don't have much to compare it to. I'm into my first week a flowing now.
The real deal is hormones in the plant dictate the effects to the plantany tips on how to reduce the gap in between nodes. keeping plants as small bushy as possible. all theory wellcome thanks
I assume you mean avoid far-red. Red inhibits shade avoidance while far-red promotes shade avoidance. Red reduces stretch.The real deal is hormones in the plant dictate the effects to the plant
you the grower manipulate these hormones to suit your own grow style
you can do this with chems (uncool) or with light (cool)
shining a hps/2700k light above ur plant is hormone manipulation
if you are trying to grow weed in say a pc case or shoe box etc ..typical of many
you'd start of post germing with a white 6500k light
avoid using any red light/2700k until the last 2 weeks on the entire grow
favoring/with practice a daylight color of about 4000k
its a test and trial to ur own situation
boost ur weed knowledge read up hormones
good luck
excuse me question for a small micro grow vipar or mars for overall performance which you feel is suitable for my needs .or just go another led route I want dank dank ass budsThat's a good summary of some techniques I've tried and validated through testing.
For the stretch period one thing it doesn't mention is managing the difference between veg kelvin and flowering kelvin. That is one of the biggest factors from what I've seen in testing. The greater the difference in colour/kelvin, the greater the stretch. In other words most stretch would be if you were vegging with 6500k and flowering with hps (2300k). So managing the stretch can be managed (greater or less) by choosing or forcing specific light colours during the first couple of weeks. An example to reduce stretch might be running a HID lamp with higher blue ratings during the stretch period, then switching it to hps. imo this is why you'll often hear folks flowering with hps, then switching to LED's for flowering seeing a big difference in reduced stretch under LED's. The most common LED kelvin rating is 3500k for flowering, so without changing veg light kelvin rating, flipping to hps in flowering vs. LED's will produce much more stretch, all other factors being equal. Prior to flowering with 3500k COBs I was using 315w CMH with a 3100k bulb and even with only a 400k difference there was a notable difference in stretch between CMH and COBs.
I can also vouch for negative DIF mentioned in the article suppressing stretch. Ran a couple of rounds last summer running negative DIF temps (higher temps during lights out) and saw a big reduction in stretch. I also noticed significant differences in bud output and density using this technique. It's difficult to run this during winter for me, but I'll go back to running negative DIF as the temps warm up, it was well worth the extra effort to maintain a negative DIF environment. If you want the stretch but want to try negative DIF, you can simply run the first couple of weeks in a traditional environment with say a 10-15F difference between lights-on and lights-off (lower temps), then switch the environment to negative DIF.
In veg, not sure why but those blurple multi-band cheap LED's (e.g. Vipar, or MARS) tend to grow very tight nodes in veg across multiple genetics and you don't have to do anything, they just grow that way under those lamps. I've used them for 4+ years and they go into flowering very tight, then I stretch them to open them up in flowering which gives me a great transition with benefits from both techs.
Fuck mars for sure but there are plenty of nice shitty Let's. Comparing a vipar or Meizhi to cfl is laughable at best.CFL light tends to give close cropping, you can also foliar feed with kelp on a regular basis to also help keep it from stretching.
Normally one would only do this once every week or 2 or three, to avoid it not stretching, so just do the opposite.
Don't even think about Mars, or any unit using those shitty LEDs.
I only use them for veg/clones.seedlings, wouldn't recommend either for flowering, they're a step above cfl's for flowering. If you were to have only one light I'd go the LED COB route, you'll get at least double the weight in flowering.excuse me question for a small micro grow vipar or mars for overall performance which you feel is suitable for my needs .or just go another led route I want dank dank ass buds
hey groerr how do they use cobsI only use them for veg/clones.seedlings, wouldn't recommend either for flowering, they're a step above cfl's for flowering. If you were to have only one light I'd go the LED COB route, you'll get at least double the weight in flowering.
It's jus another technology within the family of LED's (Chip On Board). A lot of people b wild them themselves, there are kits available where basically all you do is assembly. There are pre-built off-the-shelf panels, not a lot different than the older techs. There are bar formats like I grabbed that can have anywhere from 2 to 4 COBs per light and output anywhere from 100w to 200w each. in an environment where you only run one light you can grab or build smaller COB fixtures (even one COB per fixture) and mix/match your spectrum to suit a single light for both veg + flower, or go one colour like say 4000k and use it for both. Many options, they do produce 2-3 times the weight that a blurple panel with older tech will in flowering.hey groerr how do they use cobs