PopeyeSpinach
Well-Known Member
Huh??? Ive been running megacrop in hydroton ebb and flow for 2 ish years now and never had an issueYes it's an issue. The residual shit is too much imo. Good nute otherwise
Huh??? Ive been running megacrop in hydroton ebb and flow for 2 ish years now and never had an issueYes it's an issue. The residual shit is too much imo. Good nute otherwise
Ya mc is pretty dirty dude, far from a clean hydro nute. I ran it for a couple years too.Huh??? Ive been running megacrop in hydroton ebb and flow for 2 ish years now and never had an issue
The two part does not appear to have the chitosan or the kelp. This might be one possibility why the color is lighter. Personally, I am quite happy not to have either of those two ingredients. Kelp lovers please don't hate me.Only two batches mixed so far... The new 2 part mixes very well and is much lighter in color than v2.x
I'm interested in any feedback you have while trying out the MC two part.Just got some of the new "Part A" in the mail today. It does indeed list "amino acid chelated calcium" as one of the ingredients on the sack. If this is true, then they should list calcium content in the G.M.A so that people can accurately calculate feed schedules. If this is a mistake, then get this off the label and quit confusing people!
Some other observations:
- In true Mega Crop fashion, the stuff stinks.... horribly. It smells like some sort of animal feces that they use on the local cranberry farm. Fortunately the smell dissipates readily when mixed into water.
- Very uniform powder that dissolves quickly. There is a small amount of a very fine sediment left over which is so fine that when I pressed my finger into it at the bottom of the jug, it did not have a noticeable texture. It seemed almost like a tiny little blob of toothpaste or something. This little tiny blob showed up every time I mixed a batch and at every concentration. The blob finally completely dissolved after about 30 minutes of just sitting there. I wouldn't classify it as much of a concern.
- The mixed product is quite clear. Maybe just a little "foggy"-looking. I like this.
- There is the odd solid chunk of something in the mix. About the size of a pebble, and of a dark color. The frequency of them would be maybe one of these "pebbles" per every few cups of powder. I tested one under the tap water and it dissolved completely over the course of about a minute.
The smell on my fingers from it was very metallic; similar to iron. Possible concern for very small batch mixers.
- NO DUST! Not like my previous versions of regular Mega Crop. Even when I agitated it on purpose there was no noticeable dust at all.
- Slightly acidic, but not bad. Nothing like Maxibloom. Tap water with a ph of 6.8 became ph6.0 @ EC .6 and ph5.8 @ EC 1.2 Maybe the silica?
- Has a nice coincidence of .1ml/ltr ( I prefer to go by volume, not weight) being approximately equal to .1EC. (municipal tap water of about 20ppm) This makes it easy to quickly figure out various mix values. I tested this a few different times in order to make sure that it was consistent.
- Much higher in magnesium and sulfur than one part Mega Crop.
Overall, looking forward to giving it a try.
Great piece of feedback there!Just got some of the new "Part A" in the mail today. It does indeed list "amino acid chelated calcium" as one of the ingredients on the sack. If this is true, then they should list calcium content in the G.M.A so that people can accurately calculate feed schedules. If this is a mistake, then get this off the label and quit confusing people!
Some other observations:
- In true Mega Crop fashion, the stuff stinks.... horribly. It smells like some sort of animal feces that they use on the local cranberry farm. Fortunately the smell dissipates readily when mixed into water.
- Very uniform powder that dissolves quickly. There is a small amount of a very fine sediment left over which is so fine that when I pressed my finger into it at the bottom of the jug, it did not have a noticeable texture. It seemed almost like a tiny little blob of toothpaste or something. This little tiny blob showed up every time I mixed a batch and at every concentration. The blob finally completely dissolved after about 30 minutes of just sitting there. I wouldn't classify it as much of a concern.
- The mixed product is quite clear. Maybe just a little "foggy"-looking. I like this.
- There is the odd solid chunk of something in the mix. About the size of a pebble, and of a dark color. The frequency of them would be maybe one of these "pebbles" per every few cups of powder. I tested one under the tap water and it dissolved completely over the course of about a minute.
The smell on my fingers from it was very metallic; similar to iron. Possible concern for very small batch mixers.
- NO DUST! Not like my previous versions of regular Mega Crop. Even when I agitated it on purpose there was no noticeable dust at all.
- Slightly acidic, but not bad. Nothing like Maxibloom. Tap water with a ph of 6.8 became ph6.0 @ EC .6 and ph5.8 @ EC 1.2 Maybe the silica?
- Has a nice coincidence of .1ml/ltr ( I prefer to go by volume, not weight) being approximately equal to .1EC. (municipal tap water of about 20ppm) This makes it easy to quickly figure out various mix values. I tested this a few different times in order to make sure that it was consistent.
- Much higher in magnesium and sulfur than one part Mega Crop.
Overall, looking forward to giving it a try.
Anyone have any feedback on the new 3.0 one part? Have some coming in the mail, trying with soil!
Will do. Just to be clear though, I am only using the Part A and not the Part B, which is calcium nitrate. I use Botanicare Kind Base as my source of Calcium Nitrate. Shouldn't be much different though...I'm interested in any feedback you have while trying out the MC two part.
Thanks.
Just had a peek at that "Base", interesting. It's like a liquid calnit. Seems a bit low in calcium though? Cool.Will do. Just to be clear though, I am only using the Part A and not the Part B, which is calcium nitrate. I use Botanicare Kind Base as my source of Calcium Nitrate. Shouldn't be much different though...
The kind...Just had a peek at that "Base", interesting. It's like a liquid calnit. Seems a bit low in calcium though? Cool.
Thanks.
5.0% Ca, versus 18.x% Ca (Jacks)? (The actual ratios of Ca to N seem close, though, I guess. Unless I messed up the zero effort math).The kind...
4-0-0-5ca
Per ml. Per gallon.
N. 10.6ppm
Ca. 13.2ppm
Jacks calnit....
15.5-0-0-18ca
N. 41
Ca. 48
Per Gram.
This is the calculator dealio I use.5.0% Ca, versus 18.x% Ca (Jacks)? (The actual ratios of Ca to N seem close, though, I guess. Unless I messed up the zero effort math).
My mistake..
You calculated (elemental) ppm?
This is the calculator dealio I use.
CannaStats - Nutrient Profiles for Cannabis
This page provides a common language spoken by all fertilizer solutions and a way to mix them for growing cannabis hydroponically. Sometimes referred to as the Lucas formula, this page explains the true origin of this well known proven formula and the project that led to its discovery. Emphasis...www.angelfire.com
Enter 1 for Mixing units.
But..... I found entering 10 for Mixing units gives a little more accuracy. Just gotta be careful with decimel.
Ok, yea. I basically did the opposite of this to check what I initially did (compare ratio of Ca to N for both). Either way works.
Thanks for that. I think will copy and paste it somewhere.The kind...
4-0-0-5ca
Per ml. Per gallon.
N. 10.6ppm
Ca. 13.2ppm
Jacks calnit....
15.5-0-0-18ca
N. 41
Ca. 48
Per Gram.