Properly flush weed vs unflush weed

[NoobgrowerLbc]

I noticed when I do not flush the buds stay lime green. Smell is ok and smokes so harsh but looks amazing.

When I properly flush my buds 2 weeks before harvest they look darker. Smell is so amazing and the smoke is so smooth and very flavorful. But dosent look stunning as a bud that didn't get a proper flush.

Its not the way I dry my unflush weed looks amazing. But I can't even smoke it.

 

[Rurumo]

For what it's worth: https://www.rxgreentechnologies.com/rxgt_trials/flushing-trial/

 

[NoobgrowerLbc]

Unflushed. Looks so good but trust me you can hardly smoke it.


Properly flushed. 2 weeks. Best smoke ever and smell is the best ever. But look at the color.

 

[Wattzzup]

Cool topic. Def never been discussed on here before. This should be interesting

 

[xtsho]

Sure

I don't flush. I dont cure. My weed tastes great. Flushing does nothing but reduce the amount of nutrients available to the roots. The plant then takes what it can from the leaves and moves it to the flowers.

Science
Science
Science

 

[mile.high]

For what it's worth: https://www.rxgreentechnologies.com/rxgt_trials/flushing-trial/

The study by a lighting company showing more lights = more production was trashed on here, but this study by a nutrient company telling you to use more nutrients is passed around like scripture…

 

[Rurumo]

The study by a lighting company showing more lights = more production was trashed on here, but this study by a nutrient company telling you to use more nutrients is passed around like scripture…

Because it supports what every decent grower has known for decades. More light = more production isn't exactly controversial either.

 

[bk78]

I’ll stick with my un flushed garbage thank you

 

[bk78]

View attachment 4979375
Unflushed. Looks so good but trust me you can hardly smoke it.

View attachment 4979376
Properly flushed. 2 weeks. Best smoke ever and smell is the best ever. But look at the color.

Looks pretty midsy to me

 

[xtsho]

The study by a lighting company showing more lights = more production was trashed on here, but this study by a nutrient company telling you to use more nutrients is passed around like scripture…

Yeah because a scientist with a PhD knows less than a bunch of stoners and their broscience.

Data presented by: Stephanie Wedryk, PhD

 

[NoobgrowerLbc]

Most buyers don't even smoke. They only go by the look and smell. When I don't flush i have no problem.

 

[xtsho]

I can't believe how naive so many cannabis growers are that they believe the flushing nonsense. Even when presented with a scientific study using solid methodology they still claim flushing makes weed better. It's like the loonies that still believe the election was stolen. Some people just believe what they want regardless of the FACTS and SCIENCE.

 

[Wattzzup]

Most buyers don't even smoke

They just throw it right in the trash? Then come and buy more? I’m confused

 

[mile.high]

Yeah because a scientist with a PhD knows less than a bunch of stoners and their broscience.

Data presented by: Stephanie Wedryk, PhD

You left off the part that she’s employed by the nutrient company that ran the study.

 

[J232]

Same strain, clone, different results? It’s just you, but nice try.

 

[Rurumo]

I hate these flushing threads, but I'm compelled to comment in them just because some new grower will inevitably see this guy's comment, and BAM, another cycle of parroted bro-science continues on with the next generation.

 

[Cycad]

I flush the toilet. I don't flush my plants.

 

[NoobgrowerLbc]

They just throw it right in the trash? Then come and buy more? I’m confused

Big buyers that buy 20 pounds and up. Not the ones who buy grams.

 

[Tangerine_]

I hate these flushing threads, but I'm compelled to comment in them just because some new grower will inevitably see this guy's comment, and BAM, another cycle of parroted bro-science continues on with the next generation.

If they have less than a few hundred posts, I assume its a sock account run by a bored regular smoking shitty weed looking to troll to the forum.

 

[Tvanmunhen]

Yeah because a scientist with a PhD knows less than a bunch of stoners and their broscience.

Data presented by:

You left off the part that she’s employed by the nutrient company that ran the study.

You left out the part where you counter with a study done by a person with a PhD in horticultural science..It's a shame last run no flush I am currently smoking some tasty stuff..... It's not top shelf but then again I'm not a top shelf grower yet....