Abnjm
Well-Known Member
Yes. I read through Al's posts and couldn't find out if he was using the 0.5 or 0.7 conversion. I believe 0.5 is prevalent in the US and 0.7 is used across the pond. If he was using 0.7, and you used 0.5, your 1400 ppm would be an EC 2.8 instead of the desired EC 2.0.So if I am reading this chart correctly, if Al is using a Truncheon meter and is measuring 1400ppm and I am using a Hanna and measuring 1000ppm then we would both measure the juice at 2.0EC?
If this is the case then I am lucky I didn't burn them up.
EC is the constant, that's why I always put the EC and ppm in my nute reports.
You know how new I am to this, so I could be just talking out my a**.
Hopefully someone more experienced will stop by to tell us if I'm right or not...
EDIT: I use the BlueLab truncheon. It reports CF, EC and ppm.