Not to open another bag of worms. Something tells me that IF and by some crazy theory IF those core beams did get hot enough to melt and deform I have trouble seeing them all at once deform or melt into itself? I'm lost on how to describe? Umm? I don't know really what I'm trying to say but wouldn't the building have maybe doubled over? Bent over?
Like this?
Tip due to structural weakness then fall on itself with the downward force of 20 stories, an acre of sq. footage per story, falling from the sky onto a building of equal footprint? Yeah... that is about what I might expect too.
Ever wonder why 1 took twice as long to fall as 2?
Think it might have had to do with the weight/number of in tact floors above and that magic elasticity point of steel weakening? Makes a little more sense. If it were demo'd... way to think ahead... and aim those planes... just to give me a logical argument 8 years later.
What about Building 7? That one is the one to focus on. Maybe the pentagon and the other"plane" Sorry for the insensitivity but there are soooo many things that I cannot ignor. I don't even bother arguing much really I'm happy!!!
No problem at all. Most agree that 7 is the tricky one.
Doesn't seem that tricky to me. They say there were 3 diesel generators with upwards of 43000 gallons of fuel in them.. but I have not found anything corroborating any kind of explosion. It is noteworthy that it was there. Don't know how that would work into it really. I had decided not to "do" 7 till I was done with 1 and 2. You might notice I like to move one thing at a time. Much harder to avoid reality that way.
There were three main web trusses which supported the entire weight of the building. As the main truss began to fail, the weight of the building shifted backwards, creating the bulge between floors 10 and 13. Less than an hour later, after having been burning for 7 hours unbattled... it failed. They all knew it was going to fail. They had bigger problems. They just cleared the area and did their jobs.
That is another problem with conspiracists.
You have to assume the firemen, who lost more than 300 fellow brethren, were complicit in all of this.
NYFD is a pretty tight group. I have issues with that on principal.
"They were going up as we were coming down. I kept thinking, 'how are they going to put those fires out?'. They all looked as they passed. They all had blue eyes. They were all beautiful."
-WTC occupant wandering the street on 9/11
It's offensive.
And that is why I continue to engage... and will continue to engage. It is offensive to the thousands of fire and rescue, cops, building maintenance crews, security, ground crews, passengers, flight crews, reporters, camera crews, drivers, politicians, commercial enterprises, secretaries, demolition experts, servants, engineers, air traffic controllers, airport administrators, scientists, lab technicians you accuse of complicity, required for your beliefs to be possible.
How many would it require? How would you coordinate such an enterprise? I guess you would need programmers and modelers too... I will add some more to this list every time I post.
There is no single goal which all of these people could possibly have to gain from this treason, this horror.
Do I have to rule out mind control too?
Every one of the people required in these groups can not possibly keep this a secret. It is ridiculous to even have to argue this... and yet... here I am.
We must question our government. We must also be just in judgment... even if you think it "sounds like something they would do." If for no other reason because it would require TOO MANY AMERICANS COOPERATION to be feasible.
I cannot prove a negative, but I can demonstrate it's implausibility.
It is implausible. It is impossible. It is offensive.
