Earths Widdler
Member
Adaptation is evolving my friend...Its forever happening everywhere with everything
Adapting is not evolving. You can use the word adapt to supplement the theory of evolution, but adaptation is still NOT evolving. Adaptation is happening everywhere with everything but not necessarily evolution. Sounds like an equivocation fallacy to me.Adaptation is evolving my friend...Its forever happening everywhere with everything
Give examples of speculation? Do you understand what inductive reasoning is? We can find commonalities and differences among all of the species on this planet. Some clearly are more related to each other. These differences and similarities show up not only in anatomy and morphology, but physiology, embryology and genetics. Each time we look at relationships among various species, all of our methods confirm one another. Not only did the creationist Linnaeus classify humans as apes that are closely related to chimpanzees and other African apes, but he did so decades BEFORE Darwin. Darwin merely proposed a mechanism for how that relationship came about. Modern genetics also shows that we are closely related to chimps and other apes. The fact that we have multiple lines of evidence all pointing to the same conclusion gives us great confidence that we are correct. This is why we call the tree of life a double nested hierarchy. It is confirmed both from the top down and the bottom up with absolutely no exceptions. The evidence that evolution occurred is undeniable when you examine the evidence. The theory of evolution is not a way to demonstrate that evolution actually happens but is merely the proposed mechanism for how it happens. The fact of evolution is evident even if we remove every piece of fossil evidence.If the theory of evolution is so definitive then why is so much of it speculated? I don't have to thoroughly understand any man-made concept if I know what its major flaws are.
Dr. Arial Roth. His credentials are a mile long. There are hundreds of scientists that signed the Decent from Darwinism. Most where professors from major universities. Many of those where Biologists. Even evolutionists argue about how the first organism evolved. Actually it has been proven impossible to duplicate. And yes Abiogenesis is a part of evolution no matter what anyone tries to say. It is the process that had to have happened for evolution to take place. So evolution is full of only half truths.Do you know anyone who knows the in's and out's of the theory of evolution, took more than a high school course on it, etc. that still doesn't accept it as fact?
Do these people exist? I'd put money down that they don't and that all the millions of people out there who don't accept it at this point simply don't understand it, and if they did - they would.
hmm...
And any theory of gravity needs massive bodies to have formed for gravity to work on, chemicals and atoms are needed for chemistry and atomic theory to work, bacteria and viruses necessarily must exist for germ theory of illness to make sense, yet none of those theories are criticized by religionists for their failure to explain their origins. It appears you save this special criticism only for evolution.Dr. Arial Roth. His credentials are a mile long. There are hundreds of scientists that signed the Decent from Darwinism. Most where professors from major universities. Many of those where Biologists. Even evolutionists argue about how the first organism evolved. Actually it has been proven impossible to duplicate. And yes Abiogenesis is a part of evolution no matter what anyone tries to say. It is the process that had to have happened for evolution to take place. So evolution is full of only half truths.
well u might as well say evolution is living but my problem with evolution is that it has no beginningAdaptation is evolving my friend...Its forever happening everywhere with everything
If it wasn't religion people would kill each other over something else.Religion will be the downfall of man, Richard dawkings the god delusion is a good read. OP some people just don't want to see the truth.
I agree, I truly believe that we are all some form of advanced bacteria consuming our host, earth. That could be our purpose .If it wasn't religion people would kill each other over something else.
It's not exactly random, that's where natural selection falls in.Animals don't "Adapt" they have no control over their own genetics. It is all random.
But do you agree organized religion provides the medium for otherwise good people to do terrible things?If it wasn't religion people would kill each other over something else.
Literally anything could replace religion in your statement.But do you agree organized religion provides the medium for otherwise good people to do terrible things?
"organized religion provides the medium for otherwise good people to do terrible things"Literally anything could replace religion in your statement.