Watch what you say on here!!!!

[JessePinkman]

You guys better watch what you say from here on out. You better make sure you don't disagree with certain people. Unnk didn't agree with what others had to say in this thread "https://www.rollitup.org/hallucinatory-substances/505259-dont-smoke-k2-any-synthetic.html" so he closed it. I thought the point of discussion boards were to discuss things. I guess you are free to say what you like AS LONG AS YOU ARE ON THE RIGHT SIDE. Who else thinks it is crap that you cannot post things that others disagree with, just because of the PERSON who disagrees with it?

 

[neosapien]

You guys better watch what you say from here on out. You better make sure you don't disagree with certain people. Unnk didn't agree with what others had to say in this thread "https://www.rollitup.org/hallucinatory-substances/505259-dont-smoke-k2-any-synthetic.html" so he closed it. I thought the point of discussion boards were to discuss things. I guess you are free to say what you like AS LONG AS YOU ARE ON THE RIGHT SIDE. Who else thinks it is crap that you cannot post things that others disagree with, just because of the PERSON who disagrees with it?

I think you need to stop making meth. That shit is gross.

 

[cannabineer]

Oh sweet mother of poo.
I had to read all that.
As near as I can tell, you DID get to post what you wished ... and killed a thread.
Have any of your posts been deleted? If not ... i do invite you to re-read them.

Now take the following quiz.
1) at any time, did you defame another poster?
2) Did you adhere to the rules of logic? ("spectrum chromatography machine" ~lol~ good one)
3) Did you allow for the possibility that the other guy has a point? I.e.: Was it a discussion, or a sermon with an audience?

You have a future here, kid, but only once you learn to go "clutch out" on brain *before* going "right foot to floor" on the ol' testes. cn

 

[rocpilefsj]

Re-read the rules you had to accept to become a member here, I guarantee you that you broke at least one of them

 

[maxxy555]

i just stole this avatar

 

[chicken bob]

i just stole this avatar

figure out how to do bong hits w a lazer and u will be the coolest

 

[jokaz]

i just stole this avatar

;0)..............

 

[researchkitty]

The moderators will moderate as the site rules ask us to do. I wasnt one involved with any of this, but making more threads about deleted threads is also against the rules, so if you have a complaint please let a mod know via private message, it would help greatly. Thanks....

 

[tip top toker]

Is there a set of rules other than those agreed to when registering that i'm unaware of? Because i read nothing in those rules about this type of thread being in violation.

 

[Unnk]

man ima rebel rouser arent i

and to answer the question

i CLOSED the thread not deleted

i left it up for other ppl to see WHY i closed it

its because it was full of crap flinging not debate

when people start breaking down calling people drug addicts when their in the HS threads is a sign the thread is no contribution to the community

if you can explain to me why it would be advantageous for people to respond to whats already been said then hell ill reopen

till then

the poo flinging has been closed down

 

[cannabineer]

man ima [rabble] rouser arent i

On the Möbius strip that is HS ... you're ALWAYS on the right side ... cn

 

[Total Head]

on one hand i understand the urge to vent. my personality is built on it.

what i don't understand is the overwhelming urge to make threads about other threads that were closed. it's basically an end run around a closed thread to continue the nonsense. the intent is clearly not to be productive but to be retaliatory and continue whatever bullshit was going on.

debates are one thing. when it turns into a bunch of personal attacks and pages and pages of now off-topic arguing, it's time to end it. i've had threads closed for arguing and i was pissed that i couldn't continue to make my points. then the next day after i cooled off i read it and tried to put myself in the shoes of people who came into a thread expecting to talk about something, only to discover that it was a big whiny bitch fest. it's particularly sickening if you're not involved and just trying to read through a thread.

 

[Kodank Moment]

Lol. Who cares. You have 38 posts. Most of which probably came from mentioned thread. Grow up. It's the internet. Make a new one and don't be an ass in it and it will stay open for some kind of weird discussion about k2. P.S. it's poison. I dunno how that could really be disputed. It's fact. Good day. Here's a tissue.

 

[stoneruk]

Lol. Who cares. You have 38 posts. Most of which probably came from mentioned thread. Grow up. It's the internet. Make a new one and don't be an ass in it and it will stay open for some kind of weird discussion about k2. P.S. it's poison. I dunno how that could really be disputed. It's fact. Good day. Here's a tissue.

Good summing up of the issue

 

[woodsmaneh!]

well lets see how he does on the meter



not so good

 

[tip top toker]

Still interested where this rule is that states making thread about deleted threads is not allowed

 

[cannabineer]

I do seem to recall that there is a rule against starting threads to gripe about or "call out" other members. It's pretty obvious this thread was at/about Unnk, so that would cover it. Jmo. cn

 

[tip top toker]

And it's pretty obvious that RK stated that making threads about threads being deleted was against the rule, not a thread attacking someone else. So is there a second set of rules i've yet to read? Just want to know how we have to act. First it was a mod stating that the rules don't actually mean anything, now it's a mod saying there is a rule i can't find anywhere. Sorry if i'm confusing amtters, it's just nice to know which the actual rules are

 

[shnkrmn]

Having read the dumb thing I have to say it should not have been closed. The offending poster, op of this thread should have been infracted/banned/scourged with a bundle of dry kush branches, etc. Closing the thread seemed to be a reaction against the number of negative posts regarding the substance being discussed. He wasn't even the OP of that thread. It was just a discussion which veered into a personal attack on Unnk by a brand-new member who thinks a lot of himself. The thread was not at fault, the poster was.

Is it mandatory to be pro-hallucinatory substances to post in that forum? Or must one be blindly in favor of every single synthetic that drops out of the oil can without regard for human safety?

 

[neosapien]

I like turtles. The end.