No More Bush Tax Cuts for the Wealthiest

[beenthere]

go about what, not starving to death?

i'd say by ingesting food.

Then perhaps your problem is, either you misread my statement or couldn't comprehend it.
I said that without the wealthy, the hard working class would not be working, how would ingesting food give them gainful work?
Let's hope you proof read your ballot before you vote!

 

[abandonconflict]

go about what, not starving to death?

i'd say by ingesting food.

I'm pretty sure you need a rich lady to cook it for you, at least some of the time.

 

[UncleBuck]

Then perhaps your problem is, either you misread my statement or couldn't comprehend it.
I said that without the wealthy, the hard working class would not be working, how would ingesting food give them gainful work?
Let's hope you proof read your ballot before you vote!

without those "job creators", we'd just sit on the couch and starve to death by your logic.

apparently, it's my statement that went over your head.

 

[UncleBuck]

I'm pretty sure you need a rich lady to cook it for you, at least some of the time.

i don't know how i'd get by without these "job creators".

 

[cannabineer]

Great Scott. Job creationism does not belong in politics. cn

 

[abandonconflict]

i don't know how i'd get by without these "job creators".

Does she tell you to take out the trash?

 

[beenthere]

Not too hard to see who the fools are in here is it?

Nice catch budley, it's obvious that anyone who claims the US economy can be sustained by middle class demand alone, is a first class fool and is in dire need of econ 101.

 

[abandonconflict]

Nice catch budley, it's obvious that anyone who claims the US economy can be sustained by middle class demand alone, is a first class fool and is in dire need of econ 101.

 

[abandonconflict]

 

[abandonconflict]

 

[beenthere]

Posting cartoon images are for knuckledraggers who lack the intellect to articulate their message.

 

[cannabineer]

~can't resist~ cn

 

[beenthere]

Me neither!

 

[nontheist]

Who in their right mind thinks increasing taxes on the rich is going to help them? I mean the pentagon just told congress that "if they do across the board tax cuts it could throw us into war", the statement sounded a little like a threat. seriously? It's one thing to to tax to help the people, but for increasing wasteful spending isn't forward progress. Our government can cut a lot of useless spending without effecting any SS or welfare systems. If you guys want to fight for something fight for transparency and accountability, remember that word? it what got Obama elected, and now will be his achille heel but I digress. We the people have very little knowledge on what goes on, our military goals, our financial goals, etc. So much goes on that we will never see, and I would be a major game changer it we could. Bickering about money that is spend before its even collected, wont do us any good.

 

[canndo]

Your question is futile, neither supply nor demand gives us jobs, but together they necessitate jobs.
No matter how hard you want demand to somehow be more of an important factor then supply, you'll fail, they cannot exist without each other.

You seem to be failing to refute or address what I post. I asked several things. One was, do the rich "give" us jobs? A simple yes or no would be fine. If you want to address the difference between supply and demand we might, demand can be met in a number of ways, supply not so much

 

[canndo]

And THIS - is the real wealth distribution, the one that the Repubs are not particularly fond of talking about. This, along with the fact that we do indeed need the consumption of the middle class, and that middle class is working more and getting less, is forced to borrow in order to take up the slack - and now that isn't working.

 

[kelly4]

Let's hope you proof read your ballot before you vote!

Actually, let's hope he doesn't.

 

[beenthere]

You seem to be failing to refute or address what I post. I asked several things. One was, do the rich "give" us jobs? A simple yes or no would be fine. If you want to address the difference between supply and demand we might, demand can be met in a number of ways, supply not so much

Your question is futile, neither supply nor demand gives us jobs, but together they necessitate jobs.
No matter how hard you want demand to somehow be more of an important factor then supply, you'll fail, they cannot exist without each other.

Hey bro, if my quote above doesn't answer your question, I don't know what will. I'm not sure what part of "neither supply nor demand gives us jobs" you can't grasp!

The principle difference between you and I is, I believe supply cannot flourish without demand, you seem to assume that demand is capable on it's own.

 

[abandonconflict]

Hey bro, if my quote above doesn't answer your question, I don't know what will. I'm not sure what part of "neither supply nor demand gives us jobs" you can't grasp!

The principle difference between you and I is, I believe supply cannot flourish without demand, you seem to assume that demand is capable on it's own.

Demand IS capable of bringing supply back from the dead you nimwit.

 

[UncleBuck]

no one supplies anything that's not demanded, although people often demand things that are not supplied.