L
lynchburgball
Guest
haha...you all might be my best friends
I'm not tryin' to be a dick. I just like astronomy.haha...you all might be my best friends
Time ticks slower the faster you travel. This has been PROVEN using synchronized atomic clocks both on Earth and in orbit. The faster traveling clock in space has been measured to be clicking slower than the one on Earth.so i was watching the history channel and they were talking about Einsteins "twin theory". how if one twin traveled into space at light speed for 2 years then came back the twin on earth would have aged 20. i was high, it was late so it kinda went over my head. any clarification on this? thanks.
Hay email, I read a similar article about cosmic inflation on New Scientist magazine. Very interesting. There seems to be a lot of confusion about the process that went on after the Big Bang, people don't seem to understand that it is not the galaxies themselves that are moving away from each other, but space itself. Imagine if you will, the dough of a blueberry muffin; The dough representing space, and the blueberries galaxies. As the dough is baked it expands and so does the space between the blueberries, therefore the blueberries are drawn away from each other, but ultimately are not 'moving' themselves. In the very instance of the Big Bang, there was so much energy that hydrogen and helium could be formed; the resulting gas cooled and formed stars, where heavier elements are created such as oxygen, carbon, nitrogen ect. When the massive stars explode, they fling there material out into space where it accumulates and forms solar systems and new stars. We, are therefore the radioactive waste from dead stars, or more romantically, star dust. The evidence for this is the microwave background radiation, Which is the energy that was formed at the Big Bang in the form of gamma, but has now been reduced to microwaves. Much like the light from are grow rooms, as it quickly becomes reduced to heat (infrared). Also the fact that everything in the Universe is moving away from a single point, and moving away evenly throughout. In my mind, it also is a beautiful theory that makes complete sense, especially when one includes the Big Crunch into the mix. You only have to look at nature to see how things revolve around a cycle, birth and death. Thanks for the thread skunk.anyone interested in the "big bang" or our universe in general should check out the latest (April 2008 ) edition of Astronomy magazine.
The headline is: "Is this the shape of the Universe? Cosmic inflation may be key to proving the cosmos has 6 extra dimensions"
-- looks like the few predictions string theory has made is starting to become testable.. yippee!!!
Some other interesting reading in there also:
"How molecules in space seed life in the galaxy" -- seems intriguing - not panspermia but something altogether different.
anyway - saw the closest thing to cosmology interest for this forum on this thread and thought i'd share...
if anyone is interested and doesn't want to go out and buy a copy (or subscribe) i'll do a brief synopsis by request - otherwise i won't bore you.
bless youHay email, I read a similar article about cosmic inflation on New Scientist magazine. Very interesting. There seems to be a lot of confusion about the process that went on after the Big Bang, people don't seem to understand that it is not the galaxies themselves that are moving away from each other, but space itself. Imagine if you will, the dough of a blueberry muffin; The dough representing space, and the blueberries galaxies. As the dough is baked it expands and so does the space between the blueberries, therefore the blueberries are drawn away from each other, but ultimately are not 'moving' themselves. In the very instance of the Big Bang, there was so much energy that hydrogen and helium could be formed; the resulting gas cooled and formed stars, where heavier elements are created such as oxygen, carbon, nitrogen ect. When the massive stars explode, they fling there material out into space where it accumulates and forms solar systems and new stars. We, are therefore the radioactive waste from dead stars, or more romantically, star dust. The evidence for this is the microwave background radiation, Which is the energy that was formed at the Big Bang in the form of gamma, but has now been reduced to microwaves. Much like the light from are grow rooms, as it quickly becomes reduced to heat (infrared). Also the fact that everything in the Universe is moving away from a single point, and moving away evenly throughout. In my mind, it also is a beautiful theory that makes complete sense, especially when one includes the Big Crunch into the mix. You only have to look at nature to see how things revolve around a cycle, birth and death. Thanks for the thread skunk.
thanks buddy! Was that astronomy mag you were talking about in the U.S? because I am subscribed to one that's called Astronomy now, but It's a U.K one.bless you
It is the US mag. Do you get Sky and Telescope? I've noticed their articles seem nearly interchangeable any given month so i'm assuming that is S&T's cover story too - but I haven't received it yet.thanks buddy! Was that astronomy mag you were talking about in the U.S? because I am subscribed to one that's called Astronomy now, but It's a U.K one.
So the guys that won the Nobel prize for physics in 2011 are wrong..?It is slowing down.