Zimmerman sues NBC

[Carthoris]

you don't get the concept of "open to the public" or "public transportation system", but luckily for the citizens of this nation, the supreme court does and has ruled against racist asswipes such as yourself.

The Montgomery bus system isn't any more 'public' than the airlines that fly throughout America. They are private businesses who have contracts with the government. They are still private businesses. Does a contractor become part of the government by accepting a job to build a government building? No. The same thing applies here.

The supreme court is about as helpful as the shit stains you leave on public transportation seats. They are just politicians.

 

[UncleBuck]

The Montgomery bus system isn't any more 'public' than the airlines that fly throughout America. They are private businesses who have contracts with the government. They are still private businesses. Does a contractor become part of the government by accepting a job to build a government building? No. The same thing applies here.

The supreme court is about as helpful as the shit stains you leave on public transportation seats. They are just politicians.

hey clawfoot, here is the number for the montgomery public transit system: (334) 240-4012

go ahead and ask them if they are a public or private transit system, dumbass.

you are so far gone from reality that it is almost painful to point out what a goddamn deluded racist you are.

 

[NoDrama]

hey clawfoot, here is the number for the montgomery public transit system: (334) 240-4012

go ahead and ask them if they are a public or private transit system, dumbass.

you are so far gone from reality that it is almost painful to point out what a goddamn deluded racist you are.

Not until 1974, before that time it was private.

The City of Montgomery purchased the Montgomery Area Transit System in 1974

From http://montgomerytransit.com/?page_id=2

Have a nice day.

 

[UncleBuck]

Not until 1974, before that time it was private.



From http://montgomerytransit.com/?page_id=2

Have a nice day.

so private that the city had authority over it

While all of the other black people in her row complied, Parks refused, and was arrested for failing to obey the driver's seat assignments, as city ordinances did not explicitly mandate segregation but did give the bus driver authority to assign seats.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montgomery_Bus_Boycott#Method_of_segregation_on_Montgomery_buses

what reality do you guys pretend to live in?

 

[NoDrama]

so private that the city had authority over it

While all of the other black people in her row complied, Parks refused, and was arrested for failing to obey the driver's seat assignments, as city ordinances did not explicitly mandate segregation but did give the bus driver authority to assign seats.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montgomery_Bus_Boycott#Method_of_segregation_on_Montgomery_buses

what reality do you guys pretend to live in?

Authority? You mean a contract and the power of the purse?

 

[UncleBuck]

Authority? You mean a contract and the power of the purse?

yeah, that's not authority at all.

even if we live in your pretend world where we've been mistakenly calling buses "public transit" all these decades, it was found unconstitutional nonetheless.

stupid fucking constitution

 

[NoDrama]

so private that the city had authority over it

While all of the other black people in her row complied, Parks refused, and was arrested for failing to obey the driver's seat assignments, as city ordinances did not explicitly mandate segregation but did give the bus driver authority to assign seats.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montgomery_Bus_Boycott#Method_of_segregation_on_Montgomery_buses

what reality do you guys pretend to live in?

Do you know how they got that all to change? By having all the black folks boycott the buses, seems that 80% of all the bus companies income was derived from black people.

The boycott proved extremely effective, with enough riders lost to the city transit system to cause serious economic distress.

Had nothing to do with the constitution, it was about money though.

 

[NoDrama]

yeah, that's not authority at all.

even if we live in your pretend world where we've been mistakenly calling buses "public transit" all these decades, it was found unconstitutional nonetheless.

stupid fucking constitution

all these decades? You haven't even existed for 3 decades and you never called it that. you have always called it "The Bus". Who are you trying to fool?

 

[UncleBuck]

Do you know how they got that all to change? By having all the black folks boycott the buses, seems that 80% of all the bus companies income was derived from black people.



Had nothing to do with the constitution, it was about money though.

"with enough riders lost to the city transit system..."

LOL!

that 'private' "city transit system".

and it had everything to do with the constitution:

[h=2]Victory[/h] Pressure increased across the country and on June 4, 1956, the federal district court ruled that Alabama's racial segregation laws for buses were unconstitutional. However, an appeal kept the segregation intact, and the boycott continued. On November 13, 1956, the Supreme Court upheld the district court's ruling, leading to a city ordinance that allowed black bus passengers to sit virtually anywhere they wanted. The boycott officially ended December 20, 1956, after 381 days. The Montgomery Bus Boycott resounded far beyond the desegregation of public buses; it stimulated the national civil rights movement and launched King into the national spotlight as a leader.[SUP][16][/SUP]

 

[NoDrama]

"with enough riders lost to the city transit system..."

LOL!

that 'private' "city transit system".

and it had everything to do with the constitution:

Victory

Pressure increased across the country and on June 4, 1956, the federal district court ruled that Alabama's racial segregation laws for buses were unconstitutional. However, an appeal kept the segregation intact, and the boycott continued. On November 13, 1956, the Supreme Court upheld the district court's ruling, leading to a city ordinance that allowed black bus passengers to sit virtually anywhere they wanted. The boycott officially ended December 20, 1956, after 381 days. The Montgomery Bus Boycott resounded far beyond the desegregation of public buses; it stimulated the national civil rights movement and launched King into the national spotlight as a leader.[SUP][16][/SUP]

The 1974 year came from the Montgomery city transit system website itself, if you have a problem with that why don't you call them and straighten them out. If you don't like the source, well then you can suck it, because its the best source in the entire world.

If it weren't for the economic problems due to the boycott, there never would have been any action taken at all, not at all. So the resolution was due to greed and money which was all sparked by Rosa Parks.

 

[UncleBuck]

The 1974 year came from the Montgomery city transit system website itself, if you have a problem with that why don't you call them and straighten them out. If you don't like the source, well then you can suck it, because its the best source in the entire world.

If it weren't for the economic problems due to the boycott, there never would have been any action taken at all, not at all. So the resolution was due to greed and money which was all sparked by Rosa Parks.

your grasp of history is completely retarded and 100% wrong.

 

[NoDrama]

your grasp of history is completely retarded and 100% wrong.

I see when the debate gets difficult you just fall back on the ole insults, always reliable with that tactic.

Look buckyboy, I understand they said it was unconstitutional, but it would have never gotten that far if the boycott had not happened. You seem to think that the judges all deliberated on whether or not Rosa Parks could stay seated or not.

 

[UncleBuck]

I see when the debate gets difficult you just fall back on the ole insults, always reliable with that tactic.

Look buckyboy, I understand they said it was unconstitutional, but it would have never gotten that far if the boycott had not happened. You seem to think that the judges all deliberated on whether or not Rosa Parks could stay seated or not.

that wasn't an insult, that was an apt description of your summary of the case. the supreme court did not take up the matter because the montgomery transit system was losing money.

but that's only the tip of your iceberg of twisted history.

 

[NoDrama]

that wasn't an insult, that was an apt description of your summary of the case. the supreme court did not take up the matter because the montgomery transit system was losing money.

but that's only the tip of your iceberg of twisted history.

Talk about twisted, show me where I said the supreme court made it unconstitutional because of money. Are you unable to read? Illiteracy the real reason why you were not able to finish college?

 

[UncleBuck]

If it weren't for the economic problems due to the boycott, there never would have been any action taken at all, not at all.

I understand they said it was unconstitutional, but it would have never gotten that far if the boycott had not happened.

Talk about twisted, show me where I said the supreme court made it unconstitutional because of money.

i think you're the one who needs to learn to read. i said the SCOTUS did not "take up the matter" because montgomery buses were losing money.

in any case, i highlighted where you blame the whole thing on the economic effects of the boycott. i may have used the right effect/affect, but i doubt it.

 

[NoDrama]

i think you're the one who needs to learn to read. i said the SCOTUS did not "take up the matter" because montgomery buses were losing money.

in any case, i highlighted where you blame the whole thing on the economic effects of the boycott. i may have used the right effect/affect, but i doubt it.

sooo, if no one had boycotted anything, the supreme court would have ruled the same regardless?

 

[UncleBuck]

sooo, if no one had boycotted anything, the supreme court would have ruled the same regardless?

the supreme court sided with the district court that ruled it unconstitutional based on the 1th amendment, not based on any boycott.

seriously dude, what the fuck here? are you seriously just trying to make up history as you go to suit your tilt?

 

[Carthoris]

so private that the city had authority over it

While all of the other black people in her row complied, Parks refused, and was arrested for failing to obey the driver's seat assignments, as city ordinances did not explicitly mandate segregation but did give the bus driver authority to assign seats.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montgomery_Bus_Boycott#Method_of_segregation_on_Montgomery_buses

what reality do you guys pretend to live in?

The government has the authority to tell me I can't smoke marijuana, but I am still a private citizen. What kind of retard logic do you use? I think you need to go wipe, the shit is leaking out again.

 

[Carthoris]

Do you know how they got that all to change? By having all the black folks boycott the buses, seems that 80% of all the bus companies income was derived from black people.



Had nothing to do with the constitution, it was about money though.

You mean.... the free market.. did that?

 

[Carthoris]

"with enough riders lost to the city transit system..."

LOL!

that 'private' "city transit system".

and it had everything to do with the constitution:

Victory

Pressure increased across the country and on June 4, 1956, the federal district court ruled that Alabama's racial segregation laws for buses were unconstitutional. However, an appeal kept the segregation intact, and the boycott continued. On November 13, 1956, the Supreme Court upheld the district court's ruling, leading to a city ordinance that allowed black bus passengers to sit virtually anywhere they wanted. The boycott officially ended December 20, 1956, after 381 days. The Montgomery Bus Boycott resounded far beyond the desegregation of public buses; it stimulated the national civil rights movement and launched King into the national spotlight as a leader.[SUP][16][/SUP]

You are mixing two issues. The bus lines and the government are two different things and have different rules. The fact is that the free market fixed things long before the government did. The SCOTUS decides all kind of fucked up things. The only reason the civil rights act even exists for private business is because..... (drum roll)

The commerce clause!

The same thing they use to outlaw everything. It is a pile of bullshit argument technicality argument at the very best. The Supreme Courts job isn't to decide if things are right or wrong, only legal per the constitution. The commerce clause is so broad that outlawing shitting could fly. You'd be in jail in a minute.