got myself one... ill skip the EC toy... as long as roots are healthy.. fertilizing should be a piece of cake....GE 217. No EC meter.
Hate to break it to you pot roast, there are afghani landraces that finish in 6 weeks, outdoors
Most folks don't know though.. that technique only works when you nibble in the morning..New shit. Herborveracios fright flower response. You nibble on your leaves and make a mooing sound. Double your yeilds, Sun!
Well said jefe!I can't blame you, Uncle Ben, when these "growers" talk about harvesting plants after only 40-50 days! What will the newbies think?
Oh I know, they will listen to the guys who have been growing for several decades. This year is my 40th anniversary of growing my first pot plant, and I know that you have similar experience.
So we don't have to continually correct them, the other members recognize who to listen to. Let the trolls spout their crap, and know that most members don't pay them any attention.
Hey slab, can you elaborate some key points of important aspects and variables for that transmittance ratio to take place.. i been reading some shit that might apply to the woody stage of cannabis and stuff...90% of the PAR that a leaf absorbs. Only 5% is retained.
Around 50% is transmitted. The rest is reflected and lost as heat.
that is what I have gathered so far.
90% of the PAR that a leaf absorbs. Only 5% is retained.
Around 50% is transmitted. The rest is reflected and lost as heat.
that is what I have gathered so far.
The lower leaves are built differently than the top, not just in size, internally. Intensity diminishes true, so naturally absorption, reflection and transmittance change, the lower leaves are built for it. It 's going to get its 5% not matter what lol.Let's assume that's true for argument's sake..
So, what does that mean to the leaves below the first leaves? Does that mean that they absorb 50% of the remaining 50% -- kinda like a half life, or does that mean that they absorb the remaining 50% with nothing left for the leaves below those? Either way, a 50% transmission combined with inverse square rule doesn't make for a whole lot of light below the canopy.
This is a pretty good point that I have never considered and will probably be largely ignored. I have mother plants that right at this moment are growing out of control because I haven't the room right now for new cuttings in my veg room (waiting for the final harvest in the flower room then I will transfer and cut new clones). But anyways I have so many plants in my veg room that my mothers have been pushed to the 'dead zone'. I place where I have a few cfl bulbs. They are as lush and green underneath as they are on top and bushy as hell.I have kept large mother plants lush and green with a 40 watt shop light to give you some perspective.
My main concern wouldn't be keeping them green so much as it would be controlling unwanted stretch.This is a pretty good point that I have never considered and will probably be largely ignored. I have mother plants that right at this moment are growing out of control because I haven't the room right now for new cuttings in my veg room (waiting for the final harvest in the flower room then I will transfer and cut new clones). But anyways I have so many plants in my veg room that my mothers have been pushed to the 'dead zone'. I place where I have a few cfl bulbs. They are as lush and green underneath as they are on top and bushy as hell.I have kept large mother plants lush and green with a 40 watt shop light to give you some perspective.