The sheriff told all of the reporters to stay away and ordered all helos away "for their safety". There was a reporter on the ground shooting video, and he recorded them yelling to burn the house down. CNN has it on full blast right now. They had an ex FBI asst director on the line and he was mumbling, fumbling, over it.
He wasn't willing to turn himself in so a fair trial wouldn't have been possible.
He was going to shoot to kill until he escaped, which is why he never came out of the cabin.
Put it this way, if one of your dearest family members or friends worked as an officer and was shot and killed by a criminal and this happened, I guarantee you wouldn't be thinking about his "fair trial".
I actually don't hate cops. They do a job I would not want to do. But, it is not their job to murder people, it is their job to apprehend people. The police didn't have to burn him like Waco. They didn't even have to go in, just wait him out, tear gas, flash grenades, etc. Or like I said wait him out they did have him surrounded, did they not? He wasn't going anywhere.
My point is moot because they murdered him. I am surprised that you agree with murder.
The issue Jtprin can't seem to grasp is that they didn't kill him in self defense. They straight up burned down the house he was in in order to murder him. It's not the same thing. Shooting him in retaliation for shooting at them is one thing. Tear gassing him and him choking to death rather than coming out similar to shooting him in defense. Surrounding the cabin then setting fire to it, standing there watching it burn with guns firmly planted in their shoulders waiting to cut him in half the second he walks out the door is criminal.
The spin has happened. I checked several news sites and no mention of "burn the house down" or "gas being used".
No, they said wait him out. he couldnt go anywhere. Why cant some people comprehend what the hell they read, and not twist it to say something else.So you suggest sending more officers into the cabin, putting them at an unneccesary risk for being killed, all so that Dorner (who is the one doing the killing) can have a fair trial? Are you fucking insane?
There it is - retaliation. That is not what police are supposed to be about.They were acting in retaliation, he shot multiple officers.
They were acting in retaliation, he shot multiple officers.
There it is - retaliation. That is not what police are supposed to be about.
So they fired him(no pun intended) for a police report he filed on another officer for mis-conduct?
Again, so Dorner can shoot and kill officers but they can't kill him? It's self defense, except the police are the victims in this situation. My concern is that the media may have made it look like he's a murderer when he's not, in order to push gun control on us. Maybe they killed him so he couldn't tell his story? It's possible, but if the situation happened legitimately, then why can't the cops act in self defense?
You're angry because they killed somebody who was on a killing spree? A lot of cops are corrupt and plain stupid, especially the idiots that shot at innocent people without any real inclination Dorner was there... but come on, this man murdered multiple people and clearly wasn't turning himself in, all while shooting at police officers.
He wasn't willing to turn himself in so a fair trial wouldn't have been possible. He was going to shoot to kill until he escaped, which is why he never came out of the cabin. Put it this way, if one of your dearest family members or friends worked as an officer and was shot and killed by a criminal and this happened, I guarantee you wouldn't be thinking about his "fair trial".