Because it's a privately owned bank ran by unelected individuals that controls America's currency and cannot even be audited. They literally print money out of nothing, further driving America into debt and devaluing the dollar.
Why are conspiracy theorists so dumb?
- Thread starter loquacious
- Start date
- Status
joe macclennan
Well-Known Member
fiat currency is such a bad idea
I meant among developed nations for life expectancy, and unemployment is higher right now than when Bush left office (again, not that that's the cause). I'm not going to argue GMO's as it is common sense and a fact that they are vastly detrimental. If you disagree, so be it, go chow down those gmo's.every time in recent history a democrat has held office, the deficit has shrunk or even turned into a surplus.
every time in recent history a republican has held office, the deficit has blown up immensely.
see the difference?
america is #33, sierra leone is dead last at #193. derp dee der.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_life_expectancy
you'd be wise to wait until studies backed up your paranoia.
unemployment is falling.
notice how the line is going down right now?
burgertime2010
Well-Known Member
I don't want to drown semantically here. I am just asking what makes the naïve conspiracy minded person? I just want to that theory debunked.....no such luck so far.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
oh, cool. we have a friend of weed thieves among us, folks.
do you have a grow going, or do mommy and daddy not let you play with light bulbs yet?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
we were losing 500,000 jobs a month when bush left office, smarty.
and many developed countries are below us. united arab emirates, mexico, poland, argentina, russia, brazil and many many more.
it's not my fault that you suck at facts.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
that's mean, but i still hope your acne clears up before senior prom, that way you can get a date with a nice jewish boy and finally shed your virginity.
Amerikaner
New Member
I like that becuz " dats wacist" . Fun playing with you guys good night lovers .
Actually, you're wrong. http://healthimpactnews.com/2013/u-s-ranks-first-in-healthcare-spending-last-in-life-expectancy/ It's also a fact that America has a higher unemployment now than when Bush left office. Good night, tired and no point in arguing with someone who honestly believes the status of America revolves around which party is in office.
joe macclennan
Well-Known Member
I see you made some new friends tonite buck
Amerikaner
New Member
I am winner haah hah hah i am winner hahah - asian pinball game on simpsons
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
OK, do you have any evidence to support that claim?
Nutritional deficiencies or lack of physical activity. OK, again, do you have any evidence to support that idea?
Also, do you believe there is no such thing as a chemical imbalance in a patient's brain that cannot be remedied by natural means?
I suggest you avoid prisonplanet and FoxNEWS..
...because of the cancer or because of the chemo?
...and what of the ones who exercise regularly and have excellent diets?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lance_Armstrong
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angelina_Jolie
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christina_Applegate
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farrah_Fawcett
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaime_Milans_del_Bosch
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheryl_Crow
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Braham
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_S._Donaldson
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Berry
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Heyward
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wayne_Maki
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colin_Ingleby-Mackenzie
....
All highly physical people.. All developed cancer. How do you explain that?
Are they simply your exceptions?
guy incognito
Well-Known Member
I would like to see some one post actual chemotherapy statistics. I am looking at a person that has cancer, then had chemotherapy, and now does not have any cancer. I know he is not the only one.
Let me predict. If the statistics say chemo works more than jtprin claims he will say the statistics cannot be trusted because of big pharma. This way no matter what the statistics actually say he can explain away his claims.
Let me predict. If the statistics say chemo works more than jtprin claims he will say the statistics cannot be trusted because of big pharma. This way no matter what the statistics actually say he can explain away his claims.
burgertime2010
Well-Known Member
Just to chime in here.....I know a bit about the depressed state of being both chemically and based upon ones lifestyle. It is not a condition that has a flat cause and effective treatment can be as simple as a prescription. A sedentary lifestyle, poor diet, lack of sunlight, and irregular sleep patterns are physical factors that cause chemical imbalance. Genetic predisposition, trauma, and unknown factors are to blame as well. There is nonetheless a chemical connection that our mood is predicated upon. It is a dynamic and overdiagnosed "disorder." Evidence linking low levels of hormones, neurotranmsitters, vitamins and minerals to depression certainly exist all of which are imbalances technically. The point of this is to show that so many health disorders can be stacked and glossed over as depression. It is lazily diagnosed and proactive natural means of treatment are under-applied by patients. In my opinion, insurmountable depression is pretty rare. There are causes that we decide to ignore or are simply unaware of, intense emotions are part of the human experience, the pill culture mothers neurotic self-examination and application of states of disorder. The psychology is actually simple. Inward focus (self-obsession) is largely to blame. This perception of our own struggle and all it entitles without any perspective or concern for those of others. In time, outward focus becomes a luxury of the non-affected. I have seen many through this lens and prescribed charity. The action of helping is the only cure I know. The offering of ourselves to serve the needs of others is cathartic, enlarges our connection to others in distress diminishing alienation, people just profoundly change. The research is my own, based upon my own success and having that to share effectively with others.
Winter Woman
Well-Known Member
I have a friend that is a chemo nurse. She says that unless they get it all she will see you again in 5 years. She, also, said if she got cancer she would not treat it. Having said that I have 2 friends that beat breast cancer over 12 years ago.
Yes, there is tons of evidence that shows depression is caused by nutritional deficiencies. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2738337/ http://www.webmd.com/depression/news/20120627/vitamin-d-deficiency-linked-to-depression http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/06/100621111238.htm These are just a few examples. Are you also claiming that EMF's don't have negative effects? As far as cancer goes... they die from both chemo and the cancer. Either way, it shows how useless chemotherapy is. I don't know the lives of all of those people but Lance Armstrong was shooting himself up with chemicals all the time so maybe that's why he was depressed? People can also get depression by abusing drugs.
But he may develop cancer again within the next five years that may be much worse than the original cancer. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15630849 “The overall contribution of curative and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults was estimated to be 2.3% in Australia and 2.1 % in The USA” http://naturalsociety.com/chemotherapy-makes-cancer-far-worse/
Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
SnootchiBoochiesamerica is #33, sierra leone is dead last at #193. derp dee der.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_life_expectancy
#33 is pretty bad imo. Fuck. I'm moving to canada, they are tied for #4 lol.
unemployment is falling.
notice how the line is going down right now?
Or are unemployment benifits ending and people are working part time jobs?
- Status