highatollah
Member
How do R1 seeds compare to F1 seeds? Are they of equal quality? I have no experience with seeds, only clones.
Thanks for all replies.
Thanks for all replies.
R1 vs F1
- Thread starter highatollah
- Start date
Xs121
Well-Known Member
F1 comes from 2 unrelated plants, one is male and the other is female. Could be the same strain but different lineage. Most common F1 though, are 2 different strains.
R1 comes from 2 related female (sisters), where one female is reversed to pollinate the other female.
Obviously, F1 is a better seed, genetically superior and possibly have heterosis properties.
R1 is pretty much the same as S1. While S1 comes from one plant, R1 comes from 2 plants.
R1 comes from 2 related female (sisters), where one female is reversed to pollinate the other female.
Obviously, F1 is a better seed, genetically superior and possibly have heterosis properties.
R1 is pretty much the same as S1. While S1 comes from one plant, R1 comes from 2 plants.
highatollah
Member
Thanks for the response. I understand all that but my question is will the R1 be inferior to the F1 seed? I see seeds for sale for an R1 seed with pictures of the F1. If I buy an R1 seed is it going to be inherently inferior to the F1 pics I see on instagram?
Thanks.
Thanks.
Herb & Suds
Well-Known Member
All pics are suspect ...the seeds themselves may or may not be a representative of the parents...even f1 may not reflect the original clones
Xs121
Well-Known Member
highatollah
Member
My mistake I assumed heterosis was a reference to sexuality. Was not in my vocabulary.
You are wrong..... R1 is a cross of two un-related feminized plants where one was reversed to pollinate the other. S1 (selfing) results from reversing and pollinating the same plant, whether just a branch or a cutting (clone) of itself.
R1: First generation cross of two unlike parents (same as F1) but indicates the pollen donor was female (feminized).
So an R1 is closer to an F1 than an S1.
Last edited:
Hollatchaboy
Well-Known Member
7 year old thread. There's a good chance you dont get a response.
MtRainDog
Well-Known Member
I think the term R1 has been used for both related and unrelated parents, and there isn't exactly a standardized nomenclature in cannabis breeding.
If two sisters are bred together, then they are more like a F2
If two unrelated female plants are bred together, then they are more like a F1 (or more accurately in most cases, a poly-hybrid.)
When you cross two sisters, R2 would be the appropriate notation. And if you self a S1, you get a S2.
I think a clearer definition of the "R" is that it conforms to the same rules as "F" generations, but indicates a female-only line. That said, I've never seen even a R3, so there could be issues inbreeding within a female-only population. Would be interesting to read something concrete about that.
If two sisters are bred together, then they are more like a F2
If two unrelated female plants are bred together, then they are more like a F1 (or more accurately in most cases, a poly-hybrid.)
When you cross two sisters, R2 would be the appropriate notation. And if you self a S1, you get a S2.
I think a clearer definition of the "R" is that it conforms to the same rules as "F" generations, but indicates a female-only line. That said, I've never seen even a R3, so there could be issues inbreeding within a female-only population. Would be interesting to read something concrete about that.
Last edited:
Most everything available today is poly-hybrid.....
You responded...thanks!
Poltrack
Member
First, R1 don't really exist in nomenclature. It's not even used by scientifics ^^
So let's call them by their name, the chemically induced feminized seeds. Less sexy right ? lol
And they can be F1 as well : a female of line A crossed with a female from line B.
All feminized seeds aren't S1s.
It's very not related even in the output ^^
It's more a try to let you think it's something new or better, just in renaming stuffs.
The "R1" you're describing, is litterally a F1.
Yes.
Yes.
And no for the poly-hybrid stamp, it's related to how many traits are hybridized. Nothing to have with the filial generation.
Proper for a band of baked stoners in a couch maybe ^^ They are just progeny of fems, F2s then if the fem was a F1.
Yes.
The existence of this notation doesn't have any sense, at the base ^^
Technically it's not really a "female-only" progeny lol Or these seeds will not be able to exist ^^
A quart of century of backward on fems by example ?
The extreme reverse. If they are worked in monohybridism it's a miracle lol, so poly ... you dream awake. Or give me the name of the label so i rush them right now before the prices go crazy ^^
