Search results

No, that never happened.

No, that's still you. Your response to "'they claim to be americans and are not and they sell fakes as the real deal to rob people out of their money" is "they work with an american". You have to be retarded or insane to think this is adressing the argument. You're dancing around like a weasel...

I grew their Green Crack, which was a complete waste of time. One out of three plants actually had a sativaish high, the rest were stoney indicas. I did talk to them once, asking them advice before starting their GC. They gave me bad advice. They told me it was going to stretch "hard" because...

No, you're lying again. My argument is they're not americans but pretend to be and that all of their strains are fakes sold as the real deal You are a liar. You keep making claims that have nothing to do with these facts because you can't contradict them. My guess is you work for these fraudsters.

No, there isn't. And no, they don't say they sell american strains, they say they're american. You're now pretending to be retarded to convince yourself. You just claimed that "American seedbank" means "seedbank that sells american strains". If you don't see how this make you purposely stupid...

Yes, experience is worth nothing. I see you couldn't argue it has a value. Your inventions are worth nothing. Your yield didn't increase. That never happened. Your yield claims are lies. No, that's a fact. Right now, most of my work is weeding out old idiots slowing down companies to make...

You aren't even contradicting the statement you're replying to.

You're only lying to yourself. You can't even contradict anything I said. If you think you proved me wrong, you are mentally ill.

No, they don't. You know that: "the best american cannabis seed bank with the most superior cannabis strains for sale from TOP Californian breeders!" -HSO At this point, you're lying to yourself. They don't have Californian genetics. Their strains don't even look like the originals, they...

Well there's your problem. You should really look. Experience isn't worth anything. Being wrong for 25 years isn't worth anything. I fire experienced people every single day for incompetence.

The argument is that CO2 augmentation during the flowering phase is not beneficial, not that CO2 injection has no effect.

Still no argument.

:peace: I grew the reefer madness in 1921. The ancient Incas told me to piss on dandelions to make weed more potent. Your post doesn't contain a rebuttal to the scientific study I referenced. Contradicting science is choosing to be stupid.

You're somehow pretending that their claiming to have made a strain with one guy from California somehow makes them pretending to be Americans selling Californian clone-only strains while selling random seeds is not fraud. It's just silly at this point. You know they claim to be American. You...

Still no argument. You're a kid. A dumb one.

Think about it as trying to learn one language at a time instead of four. If you have four plants and four different schedules, keeping track of what's going right and what's going wrong will be much harder. But yeah, two can work. Especially with clones since you can know exactly when they...

You looked for scientific evidence to contradict the scientific evidence I provided, couldn't find any, probably found more evidence proving your wrong (because no study will show the opposite) and you choose to still believe something wrong. Since you can't actually argue anything or even know...

This means CO2 either does nothing or hurts yield in flowering.

I highly recommend doing just one strain on your first grow if you want easy. Those four plants could drink at different times and have different nute requirements. Instead of mixing one batch and watering four plants at the same time, you could find yourself having to make one batch for each...

Did they advertise the tea as being from Arizona?