40 Senate Democrats Join GOP to Send $717 Billion Military Spending Bill to Trump's Desk

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
"Not one op-ed or editorial or talking head on cable news will ask 'how will we pay for it?' Funding for bombs, guns, military bases, warships, fighter jets is simply factored in. Like gravity or entropy, it just is."

In a late afternoon vote that garnered very little attention in the corporate media—and predictably didn't spark any of the handwringing about costs that pundits typically apply to social programs for the poor and working class—40 Democrats and Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) joined nearly every Senate Republican on Wednesday to send a $717 billion military spending bill to President Donald Trump's desk.

"Not one op-ed or editorial or talking head on cable news will ask 'how will we pay for it?'"

—Adam JohnsonThe legislation—formally titled the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2019—is now "on track to become law before the start of the fiscal year for the first time since the fiscal 1997 bill," The Hill reported. Trump is expected to sign the measure before the end of the week.
The final Senate vote tally was 87-10 (view the full roll call below).

As the Washington Post's Jeff Stein noted on Twitter, the legislation will hit Trump's desk at a time when "military spending, adjusted for inflation, is higher than at any point outside the Iraq War."

evqLBTL.png


"Not one op-ed or editorial or talking head on cable news will ask 'how will we pay for it?'" media analyst Adam Johnson noted following the Senate's vote. "Funding for bombs, guns, military bases, warships, fighter jets is simply factored in. Like gravity or entropy, it just is."

Overall, the 2019 NDAA will hike military spending by $82 billion. The Intercept's Alex Emmons has noted that with $80 billion a year, you could make public colleges and universities in the U.S. tuition-free."

Here are the ten senators who voted against the spending measure: Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Mike Lee (R-Utah.), and Marco Rubio (R-Fla.).

In addition to Sen. Angus King, who caucuses with the Democrats, here are the 40 Democrats who voted to send the NDAA to Trump's desk:

PWO8VAQ.png
 
is this the bill where trumps doing it on his own? bush tried it and the treasury declined it..
 
Last edited:
"Not one op-ed or editorial or talking head on cable news will ask 'how will we pay for it?' Funding for bombs, guns, military bases, warships, fighter jets is simply factored in. Like gravity or entropy, it just is."

In a late afternoon vote that garnered very little attention in the corporate media—and predictably didn't spark any of the handwringing about costs that pundits typically apply to social programs for the poor and working class—40 Democrats and Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) joined nearly every Senate Republican on Wednesday to send a $717 billion military spending bill to President Donald Trump's desk.

"Not one op-ed or editorial or talking head on cable news will ask 'how will we pay for it?'"

—Adam JohnsonThe legislation—formally titled the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2019—is now "on track to become law before the start of the fiscal year for the first time since the fiscal 1997 bill," The Hill reported. Trump is expected to sign the measure before the end of the week.
The final Senate vote tally was 87-10 (view the full roll call below).

As the Washington Post's Jeff Stein noted on Twitter, the legislation will hit Trump's desk at a time when "military spending, adjusted for inflation, is higher than at any point outside the Iraq War."

evqLBTL.png


"Not one op-ed or editorial or talking head on cable news will ask 'how will we pay for it?'" media analyst Adam Johnson noted following the Senate's vote. "Funding for bombs, guns, military bases, warships, fighter jets is simply factored in. Like gravity or entropy, it just is."

Overall, the 2019 NDAA will hike military spending by $82 billion. The Intercept's Alex Emmons has noted that with $80 billion a year, you could make public colleges and universities in the U.S. tuition-free."

Here are the ten senators who voted against the spending measure: Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Mike Lee (R-Utah.), and Marco Rubio (R-Fla.).

In addition to Sen. Angus King, who caucuses with the Democrats, here are the 40 Democrats who voted to send the NDAA to Trump's desk:

PWO8VAQ.png

PWO8VAQ.png


Corey Booker and Tammy Duckworth..yup @UncleBuck, they found the gravy train of establishment politics.:clap: maybe they should just get their asses out there and do what their voters wish then they would get donations?..i know, i know it's just EASIER to do backroom deals and stroke your portfolio with dust gloves.

with these names above..all i can smell is donor, as it just oozes from their pores reminiscent of RAW SEWAGE.
 
Last edited:
PWO8VAQ.png


Corey Booker and Tammy Duckworth..yup @UncleBuck, they found the gravy train of establishment politics.:clap: maybe they should just get their asses out there and do what their voters wish then they would get donations?..i know, i know it's just EASIER to do backroom deals and stroke your portfolio with dust gloves.

with these names above..all i can smell is donor, as it just oozes from their pores reminiscent of RAW SEWAGE.

How do you stand that smell coming of Bernie? If you keep holding your nose, will it just go away?

B9331803747Z.1_20180323120059_000_G7KLGD8SR.1-0.jpg


For years, retired Col. Rosanne Greco, the de facto leader of the F-35 opposition, has pleaded with members of the congressional delegation to hear public feedback about the impact of increased noise and the loss of habitable homes in the community. In the winter of 2012, Greco and her allies even persuaded 16 Burlington-area ministers and rabbis to issue an open letter to Vermont’s politicians urging further public discussion on the matter.

Yet after all of the letters, rallies and petitions beseeching Sens. Patrick Leahy and Bernie Sanders, and Rep. Peter Welch to meet with residents on the issue, the only response Greco can only point to is a form letter she received from a member of the delegation in which her name was misspelled. (“The letter began, ‘Dear Ms. Truono,’” Greco recalled with a laugh.)

“There has never been any public forum where any of our congressional representatives has sat down with anybody that is opposed to this basing,” Greco said. “I don’t know if they’ve met with the National Guard, the Greater Burlington Industrial Corporation or Ernie Pomerleau. But I know they haven’t met with us.”

All three members of the Vermont’s congressional delegation, Leahy, Sanders and Welch, declined to be interviewed.

maxresdefault.jpg


images
 
Here are the ten senators who voted against the spending measure: Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Mike Lee (R-Utah.), and Marco Rubio (R-Fla.).

Merkley/Wyden 2020
 
"Not one op-ed or editorial or talking head on cable news will ask 'how will we pay for it?' Funding for bombs, guns, military bases, warships, fighter jets is simply factored in. Like gravity or entropy, it just is."

In a late afternoon vote that garnered very little attention in the corporate media—and predictably didn't spark any of the handwringing about costs that pundits typically apply to social programs for the poor and working class—40 Democrats and Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) joined nearly every Senate Republican on Wednesday to send a $717 billion military spending bill to President Donald Trump's desk.

"Not one op-ed or editorial or talking head on cable news will ask 'how will we pay for it?'"

—Adam JohnsonThe legislation—formally titled the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2019—is now "on track to become law before the start of the fiscal year for the first time since the fiscal 1997 bill," The Hill reported. Trump is expected to sign the measure before the end of the week.
The final Senate vote tally was 87-10 (view the full roll call below).

As the Washington Post's Jeff Stein noted on Twitter, the legislation will hit Trump's desk at a time when "military spending, adjusted for inflation, is higher than at any point outside the Iraq War."

evqLBTL.png


"Not one op-ed or editorial or talking head on cable news will ask 'how will we pay for it?'" media analyst Adam Johnson noted following the Senate's vote. "Funding for bombs, guns, military bases, warships, fighter jets is simply factored in. Like gravity or entropy, it just is."

Overall, the 2019 NDAA will hike military spending by $82 billion. The Intercept's Alex Emmons has noted that with $80 billion a year, you could make public colleges and universities in the U.S. tuition-free."

Here are the ten senators who voted against the spending measure: Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Mike Lee (R-Utah.), and Marco Rubio (R-Fla.).

In addition to Sen. Angus King, who caucuses with the Democrats, here are the 40 Democrats who voted to send the NDAA to Trump's desk:

PWO8VAQ.png
Regarding those other Senators on your list above, they represent their states just like Bernie does his. Reality sucks, doesn't it Pad?

Both my senators voted against it. I totally agree that most of the country is more conservative that I am, more conservative than the senators from Oregon and more conservative than most of the people of Oregon. Even though they lost this vote, I expect Merkely and Wyden to come back to work tomorrow and find areas of agreement with the fucked up forty and continue to resist Trump's assault on our democracy.

Maybe you can understand this: 10 < 51. Ten senators can't make a majority in the Senate.
 
Regarding those other Senators on your list above, they represent their states just like Bernie does his. Reality sucks, doesn't it Pad?

Both my senators voted against it. I totally agree that most of the country is more conservative that I am, more conservative than the senators from Oregon and more conservative than most of the people of Oregon. Even though they lost this vote, I expect Merkely and Wyden to come back to work tomorrow and find areas of agreement with the fucked up forty and continue to resist Trump's assault on our democracy.

Maybe you can understand this: 10 < 51. Ten senators can't make a majority in the Senate.
That's why Micheal Bennet has lost my vote.

It's a conversation that I'll be having with everyone I can in 2020.
 
Back
Top