Ban Assault Weapons

Should AR type weapons be banned,

  • Yes, ban them with a buy back program.

    Votes: 7 46.7%
  • Yes, ban but allow existing ownership

    Votes: 2 13.3%
  • No ban, it is an assault on the 2nd Admendment

    Votes: 6 40.0%

  • Total voters
    15

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
A majority of Americans supports banning the future sale of assault-style rifles but is against a federal gun-confiscation program that would force current owners to forfeit such weapons, according to a new Monmouth University poll.

About 56 percent of respondents in the Monmouth poll supported banning assault-style weapons, while 38 percent opposed it (Trump voters). Only 43 percent of respondents supported a “mandatory buyback program,” in which the federal government would confiscate such weapons from current owners, while 53 percent of respondents opposed such a program.

“An assault weapons sales ban has majority support but there are deep pockets of opposition among gun-owning Americans,” said poll director Patrick Murray. “There is even greater opposition to programs that would try to take these weapons out of the hands of people who already own them.”

So, the majority wants to ban further sales of assault weapons, but the majority also doesn't want them removed from the present owners of the weapons.

What the fuck?

Keep the existing weapons on the streets, but ban further sales?

That should workout well considering there are over 1,000,000 AR's and AK's out there now in the USA.

I say make them illegal to own, spend the money (fuck the Wall) and buy back the weapons from the miscreants that own them (they can use the money for dental repair probably), and start to end this madness.

There's no way out here children, you can't have it both ways.

Get them off the streets by any means necessary, because all they are designed for is the death of human beings as quickly as possible, which is a slight problem for the civilian population in the US, as we see monthly.
 
The notion of arming yourself against the government is a outdated as a flintlock
No need for civilians to be armed with assault weapons period
 
Yes stop selling and take them all back. How much money would it take to buy them all back? I don’t think they should get cash back. I like the idea of dental care and hygiene classes in exchange for the weapons and maybe some form of counseling and education as options to choose from.
 
Yes stop selling and take them all back. How much money would it take to buy them all back? I don’t think they should get cash back. I like the idea of dental care and hygiene classes in exchange for the weapons and maybe some form of counseling and education as options to choose from.
Lol
 
Yes stop selling and take them all back. How much money would it take to buy them all back? I don’t think they should get cash back. I like the idea of dental care and hygiene classes in exchange for the weapons and maybe some form of counseling and education as options to choose from.


Yes, give them something that they will want.

Not dental care or hygiene, maybe free crew cuts for a year. The pea-brains will go for that! :lol:

:mrgreen:
 
There is no need for anyone to have an assault rifle 15 (ar15) or assault killer 47 (ak47)
Thats about the only thing I agree with you on, buck.

No point in using it for home defense if it rips holes through your house and hits a few neighbors or your family.

No point in using it for hunting, either. If you can't hit what your aiming at with the first shot, or two, you don't need to be hunting. True hunters take pride in in clean kill shots and respect the hunt like a ritual. Drunk hillbillies with a thirty pack drank, in the woods waiting to shoot anything that moves, are the ones you see shaving the woods down with assault rifles.

If we were going to violently overthrow the government for being corrupt, it would have been done by now. There is no way you could get the major population to revolt if you wanted to, they are domesticated animals, unless you cut off the food supply to get them going feral. Until then, starting a revolt is just going to label you as a terrorist and the people will see you as that as you are put down.

I am all for banning access to that heavy of firepower to the public. The forefathers sure could plan ahead, but I don't think they planned on shit like this. Never know when an amped up and mentally damaged leftist with an AK could read a kill republicans thread and go on a rampage.
 
Thats about the only thing I agree with you on, buck.

No point in using it for home defense if it rips holes through your house and hits a few neighbors or your family.

No point in using it for hunting, either. If you can't hit what your aiming at with the first shot, or two, you don't need to be hunting. True hunters take pride in in clean kill shots and respect the hunt like a ritual. Drunk hillbillies with a thirty pack drank, in the woods waiting to shoot anything that moves, are the ones you see shaving the woods down with assault rifles.

If we were going to violently overthrow the government for being corrupt, it would have been done by now. There is no way you could get the major population to revolt if you wanted to, they are domesticated animals, unless you cut off the food supply to get them going feral. Until then, starting a revolt is just going to label you as a terrorist and the people will see you as that as you are put down.

I am all for banning access to that heavy of firepower to the public. The forefathers sure could plan ahead, but I don't think they planned on shit like this. Never know when an amped up and mentally damaged leftist with an AK could read a kill republicans thread and go on a rampage.
I heard you let guys suck your dick?

Do you let guys suck your dick
 
Back
Top