When we are paying the tax dollars that provide the benefits that gives us some say in the use of that money. I'm not agreeing or disagree with your opinion on gay marriage or your assertion that we should be able to love who ever we choose, but i do disagree with your opinion that we should have no say in the uses of the money we supply collectively.
so when you are say is you want input imo you are saying they are not our equal..what benefits do you feel you need to vote on?
i think the majority of us would agree
awesome! if the concern though is tax dollars..it's a proven fact that people in relationships are healthier, live longer lives than those of us who are single..so what's the tax burden?i think the majority of us would agree
Yes, they are not equal under our current definition. I am saying we need to redefine our definition of equal. Our practice of labeling humans man, woman, couple, ect... is what, by definition make us not equal, man =/= woman, thus man + man =/= man + woman. Now if we redefine how we how we label people where man = woman = couple then we can provide benefits biased on your humanity and dare i say, citizenship rather than social status.
the issue i have with the subject in general is that man/women (good) and entitled to all the benefits that marriage bring however, when it's man/man (bad) it has to be decided whether or not WE WANT TO PAY for that coupling in tax dollars..however, that man is NOT gonna marry a women..and that man has a right to marry..you would be okay with paying your tax dollars for a man/women coupling..what's the difference?
imo one human should be able to marry another human. end of story.technically men can not marry men because the law states that it must be a man and a woman,
but they could change the marriage law if they wanted to to allow men to marry men
this reminds me of the law on indecent exposure lol technically speaking a woman can't indecently expose herself
but she can breach the peace by exposing herself a technicality i suppose but that's the law as it stands
peace
lol oh come on..case in point
..interracial marriages..it wasn't too long ago that this was not recognized and the Supreme Court had to rule on..i think we should cut to the chase and do it!
I am disputing the practice all together, I feel any American should be entitled to the same benefits of being a citizen regardless of sexual persuasion, race, religion, or social status.
that was a conservative trying his best to not say he doesn't actually believe in marriage equality, folks.
oh, thank goodness
yes, we get it. gay people can't make babies and you're trying your best not to just come out and say how much it irks you. go ahead sweetie, let it all out.
perhaps you are right, but should we limit it to human - human
