NASC white label

I am growing their purple punch fems freebies. on day 72/73 of flower. they are not ready could be a week or two more. i can't find other people taking punch this long. i have completely missed my nute timing on them...supposed to be 8 to 10 weeks max and i run a 9 week schedule for nutes (last grow emerald OG x critical +) everything was super ready at day 65 or before). no regrets on the cut and some of it was comatose.



I went through some of their seed descriptions last night. it seems they mislabel things (on purpose>?) their silver haze is the amnesia description from this one breeder. the silver haze from that breeder is totally different (and what you would actually want).
people say this is barney's farm. I don't think so.
I don't understand the name changes. for purple punch they don't mention larry OG, instead SFV OG. they use the description on some other sites, but i found a similar description for Valley Punch which the SFV OG version of punch...that has a 70 to 77 day flower instead of the 60 to 70 day designation. so the description from one vendor and the timing from barney's farm.

i more than understand the inaccuracy or flat out lies that breeder descriptions provide for timings, but i am going by the many grow reports...everyone and their mom seems to have grown purple punch once.

1. do they look like they need a bunch more time? a week 12 cut of purple punch (one two of two no less) seems weird.
2. is this purple punch?

Purple Punch should have a fruity smell like the name implies. It usually finishes pretty fast. My wife always remarks on that. The people who write the descriptions for the seed banks might be copying each other.

I looked at the images again and I think I see some purple pigments. That’s a good sign.

I hope you like the flowers when you get around to harvesting.

Jim Haddar said:

Purple Punch should have a fruity smell like the name implies. It usually finishes pretty fast. My wife always remarks on that. The people who write the descriptions for the seed banks might be copying each other.

I looked at the images again and I think I see some purple pigments. That’s a good sign.

I hope you like the flowers when you get around to harvesting.

Click to expand...

they are still about 10% clear in the farthest along. about 30% clear in the slower one. i am going to cut both this week, but will give them a few more days . in some placees ambeer is starting to form. i dont usually like that but this will be my inda couch shiz.

i took down one yesterday at day 74 just to try it out. it seemed ready enough...not a lot of amber but a little and maybe 85% cloudy. the tops are fantastic, but the larf is rediculously leafy. leafiest plant i ever trimmed. the scissor hash was fantastic next level type of high. almost felt like a sativa the way the high hit the strongest in the center of the head, but it was definitely indica as i had a good body stone going. weird high. Idk, it might have ruderalis. it reminds me a bit of the auto high. coincidentally, there is a guy who posted pics of a long flowering purple punch and it was a fast version....and i noticed one of the ones they sell is a 10 to 12 week purple punch. wtf. so, nasc doesn't know what they are selling. i am guessing the bigger names have the most bullshit.

White label is a crapshoot . A friend bought 50 each of Wedding Cake and GSC from NASC for his outdoor grow this year . He had about 10 extras that went under a 1000 watt HPS . There were 5-6 different phenos , none really looks like what they were labeled as , with one being an auto .

Just started smoking them and they're all pretty good though . One is some crazy looking sativa that I wish he would have cloned . Germination was about 98% and they came 3 days after payment . Everything else he and I have gotten from NASC has been breeder packs and on the money .

I warned him but he persisted and says the outdoor plants are doing great . He's still happy with what he got for the money . NASC is straight up calling them White label so I can't knock them on it .

Unga Bunga said:

White label is a crapshoot . A friend bought 50 each of Wedding Cake and GSC from NASC for his outdoor grow this year . He had about 10 extras that went under a 1000 watt HPS . There were 5-6 different phenos , none really looks like what they were labeled as , with one being an auto .

Just started smoking them and they're all pretty good though . One is some crazy looking sativa that I wish he would have cloned . Germination was about 98% and they came 3 days after payment . Everything else he and I have gotten from NASC has been breeder packs and on the money .

I warned him but he persisted and says the outdoor plants are doing great . He's still happy with what he got for the money . NASC is straight up calling them White label so I can't knock them on it .

Click to expand...

whatever i got, it is simular enough between the two plants, but they are not the same at all one was a bitch, the other a great plant that is slow as shit. it looks like a lot of gdp crosses. when trimming it, i could have swore i was trimming some durban. it looked and smelled like it afterward. the high at first was too....but then it was something else. hard to say.