Octopot and coco

heykevo

Member
I got an octopot system for my tents because hand watering was dumb. I’m going through the process in my head. It wicks up water from the res and makes sure everything is saturated. Awesome.

But, what about runoff? It seems like there isn’t any? Is that ok? Do I still use cal mag? Do I need to flush often? I had this whole process nailed down in my head but I realized there’s no runoff and I’m so confused now. No runoff means they’ll build up salts and stuff I thought.

Anyone running octopots have any input here? Feels like I’m missing something obvious.
 

Rocket Soul

Well-Known Member
Octopots are not really for coco, imo opinion. Its for organic soil. Theres a system called PPK which works better for hydro. Theres some instructions on how to make it on icmag by poster delta9.
 

Nrk.cdn

Well-Known Member
I looked at the octopots but i run coco so a dtw was better for me.

I researched them and soiless (ss #4, promix hp) is better for octopot. They are basically a SIP.
 

Rocket Soul

Well-Known Member
If you wanna do runoff top water in octopot, with hydro: id recommend aomething much less water holding than coco. Perlite/or rough/large perlite maybe with a dash of coco or wormcastings on top. And make a temporary hole in the bottom res for run off. That really is basicly a PPK.

If you wanna do the rabbit hole thing Delta9 posts as Greyfader nowadays; he has some cracking threads and grows, including build instructions and photos over at IC.
 

Rocket Soul

Well-Known Member
The key is it doesn't dry out so salt build up is minimised .

Also it's typical of a system like that, like autopots, that you run low EC nutrients to avoid it.
Another thing a lot of people do is run it like drain to waste first, inorder to encourage rootgrowth in all the pot. If you just bottom feed from the start theres a tendency for the roots to bolt down towards the res and then not occupy the rest of the pot.
Id avoid any coco system where i cannot measure runoff accurately.
 

heykevo

Member
Also it's typical of a system like that, like autopots, that you run low EC nutrients to avoid it.
Interesting. I'm running cutting edge louder powder. Their recommended feeding in a reservoir is higher than I fed last time hand watering, they do around 2 - 2.5 EC, 1400-1750 ppm (700 scale). I'd assume that's not considered "low EC nutrients". Any considerations there? I'm thinking I'm just gonna run it as instructed and pull back if I notice any burn.
 

coreywebster

Well-Known Member
Interesting. I'm running cutting edge louder powder. Their recommended feeding in a reservoir is higher than I fed last time hand watering, they do around 2 - 2.5 EC, 1400-1750 ppm (700 scale). I'd assume that's not considered "low EC nutrients". Any considerations there? I'm thinking I'm just gonna run it as instructed and pull back if I notice any burn.
I've only ran autopots,not octo, but I think it's the same principle .
Autopots recommended around 1.2EC I think.

But on the other hand some nutrient manufacturers suggest way more than others in general.

If you see a large amount of salt build up on the top you'll know it's OTT
 
Top