revert to veg after harvest?

I'm a minimally invested newbie, but I still have a decision to make, fast. I'm not quite 2 weeks into flowering, so it's probably not too horribly late to take some cuttings, but I'm really busy so I'd rather not mess with cloning right now. My question: is there any reasonable possibility of reverting a harvested plant back to veg?

Background info: I started with variety mystery bagseed, and got 5 beautiful, bushy as fuck indicas that turned out male (and now in the compost pile)
and, (fortunately not a total loss) also 2 female sativa dominated plants that I'm now concerned with. I'm growing in pots in coco via run to waste...very primitive, but it's working so far.

edit: Okay, I don't know why I didn't find this before, but here are answers that were already here, my bad:

https://www.rollitup.org/general-marijuana-growing/92298-clone-after-harvest.html

Yes you can harvest revert and take clones and then harvest again.

Dirtyboy said:

Yes you can harvest revert and take clones and then harvest again.

Click to expand...

Why bother with bagseed stock? seeds usually start faster, and each time you do this you degrade the genetics (through stress) you started with.

More here:
This from Marijuana Cultivation/Cloning - Wikibooks:
"Basically you clone when you want to be able to replicate the exact genetic characteristics of a plant. If you have found not only a good strain but a particularly fine specimen you can share it by cloning. Or you can keep the fine plant in the vegetative stage forever and only grow out and mature cuttings of it. Not only do you have a plant with known properties such as potency, potential yield, disease resistance, size, etc but you will be able to have a garden of plants that given the same conditions will more or less grow at the same rate and respond to the same way to different training methods. Your plants will all have the same nutrient requirements as well.
Cloning is also an ideal way to determine the sex and properties of potential mother plants without every having them undergo the stress of flowering. This is much better than taking a cutting during flowering or putting a flowering plant back under a longer light cycle to revert it back to vegetative growth. Stress can alter or damage genetic material and that genetic change will be passed to the cuttings taken from the mother after that point."
"Generational Cloning
This is the chance to squash another myth. To cut to the chase, a clone of a clone of a clone of a clone can be taken for at least several hundred generations out without any negative effects to the plant. In fact, replacing your mother with a fresh clone from healthy tissue often will mean less genetic damage due to stress and aging over the life of the plant."

Best plant I ever owned was brought to fully ripe, robbed of its buds, cut back to a shadow of its former self and reveged. Had a little green on it but not much. Came back nice short, bushy loaded with buds. Highest yielder I had no doubt. In fact I saw a post from a person on here talking about doing such a thing to all his plants. Kept up a prepetual harvest off the same plants.