hornedfrog2000
Well-Known Member
That way the looney tunes we all know are nuts can know it too. Not that it would stop all of them, but some of them are so stupid they should be in the red like they used to be (and know it).
Because rep is always so relevant to your growing ability? For example my last 10 reps, not one of them was given to me for anything remotely cannabis related, mostly food related. Like with post counts, rep really has nothing to do with anything. And can you imagine the amount of negative rep that would get thrown around in the politics section?I understand both Sides of the argument ,well no argument.
but both posters make good points.
i like the idea of negative rep,or a green/red bar,just so noobs have a general idea who has good advice and who they shouldn't trust.
i agree with this. maybe add a red star sort of like other drug forums.people abused the neg. rep just like they abuse the + rep. throwing neg. reps just because you dont like someone.
you didn't see anyone crying when they get a + but when they got a neg. look out.
its a happier community without the neg. rep.
With whole threads designed to rep people for the hell of it; attaching your rep power to neg. rep would never be balanced.You know, I gave this some more thought last night while fighting the insomnia. If it works like rep, and you have to hit about 30 people before you can give - rep again, it might not be so bad. Also, if the - rep is commensurate with your rep power, not so bad. That way, if some troll keeps making new accounts to - rep someone they hate, it will be a big zero for their effort. This means that the people who have established themselves and have a higher rep power, can knock the new people, who mysteriously get a full bar in under a 200 posts) back down pretty quick when they start acting up. Maybe not such a bad thing. It actually makes the rep bar more valuable, and more in line with what the community as a whole thinks.