Santorum: I’m More Qualified Than Pope Francis To Talk About Climate Change Because I’m A Politician

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member


In an interview with Fox News Sunday, former Pennsylvania senator and current GOP presidential candidate Rick Santorum tried to explain why he is more qualified than the Pope to discuss climate change. Santorum caused a stir earlier this week when he told a Philadelphia radio station that Pope Francis should “leave science to the scientists” and focus on things like “theology and morality” instead of climate change.
“If he’s not a scientist — and in fact, he does have a degree in chemistry — neither are you?” host Chris Wallace asked Santorum Sunday. “So, I guess the question would be, if he shouldn’t talk about it, should you?”

Santorum defended his discussions about climate change by distinguishing politicians from church leaders. “Politicians, whether we like it or not, people in government have to make decision with regard to public policy that affect American workers,” Santorum said, adding that while “the pope can talk about whatever he wants to talk about,” he questions the Pope’s use of his moral authority to combat the issue of climate change.

“I’m saying, what should the pope use his moral authority for?” Santorum asked. “I think there are more pressing problems confronting the earth than climate change.”

The Catholic Church has long framed climate change as a moral issue, noting that its potential impacts — rising sea level, more frequent extreme weather events, and natural resource scarcity — disproportionately impact poor and developing nations. The Pope is expected to release an encyclical letter on the environment June 18, which will be the Church’s strongest move to date on addressing the issue of climate change.
Santorum — a devout Catholic — disagrees with the Pope’s stance that climate change is a man-made. He has often called climate science “political science,” and argued on Sunday that a scientific consensus on climate change underscores this point.

“All of this certainty, which is what bothers me about the debate, the idea that science is settled,” Santorum said. “Any time you hear a scientist say science is settled, that’s political science, not real science.”
97 percent of actively publishing climate scientists agree that the climate-warming seen over the past century is a result of human activity. The scientific consensus that global-warming is man made is about the same as the consensus within the scientific community that smoking leads to lung cancer.

On Sunday, Santorum also called climate science “speculative science, which has proven over time not to have checked out,” claiming that climate predictions over the past 15 years have proven untrue. One common climate denial argument rests on a so-called “pause” in global warming over the past 15 years, when temperatures were not appearing to rise at the rate predicted by climate models. Early this week, however, NOAA released a new study reassessing temperature data over the past century taking into account new methods for measuring global surface temperature. The study found that there has been no slowdown in global temperature increase over the past 15 years — instead, the rate of temperature increase has been accelerating slightly.

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2015/06/07/3666980/santorum-climate-change-science-not-settled/

 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
Well I guess that answers the age old question of who is more qualified to talk global warming, a politician or a pope. Glad that's settled.

Santorum and Perry are probably the two people I would root against another Bush to come out of the primary. Nah, I don't know...well probably. Damn, just threw up a little thinking of it.

Imagine if the choice for pres comes down to Clinton vs any of those three.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
Well I guess that answers the age old question of who is more qualified to talk global warming, a politician or a pope. Glad that's settled.

Santorum and Perry are probably the two people I would root against another Bush to come out of the primary. Nah, I don't know...well probably. Damn, just threw up a little thinking of it.

Imagine if the choice for pres comes down to Clinton vs any of those three.
You'd vote for "lube and fecal matter" any day of the week and twice on Sunday. No need to hide it.
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
You'd vote for "lube and fecal matter" any day of the week and twice on Sunday. No need to hide it.
Oman, don't start repeating the words of a blathering idiot creepy stalker, people might start assuming you think like him.

I mean, here on a forum, sure it's no big deal. Think about real life, how would like to be compared to that? You would have no respect at your work place.

Last time I voted for the person that actually won the POTUS was Clinton, so... lube and fecal matter would only be true if I voted Clinton again.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
Oman, don't start repeating the words of a blathering idiot creepy stalker, people might start assuming you think like him.

I mean, here on a forum, sure it's no big deal. Think about real life, how would like to be compared to that? You would have no respect at your work place.

Last time I voted for the person that actually won the POTUS was Clinton, so... lube and fecal matter would only be true if I voted Clinton again.
lube and fecal matter was a reference to Santorum. i thought this was clearly outlined in the above posts. did you not read the entire thread?
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
lube and fecal matter was a reference to Santorum. i thought this was clearly outlined in the above posts. did you not read the entire thread?
Ah shit, I did read that part, sorry man.

I take it back and happily.

but lol no way I would vote for that tool, if you have to assume I would so you could win some argument in the future, that's cool too, you just look dumb when doing so.

I have as much disdain for the moral majority crowd as I do the PC police. Neither will ever get my vote. I will either vote mickey mouse or stay home before I vote lesser of two evils.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
Ah shit, I did read that part, sorry man.

I take it back and happily.

but lol no way I would vote for that tool, if you have to assume I would so you could win some argument in the future, that's cool too, you just look dumb when doing so.

I have as much disdain for the moral majority crowd as I do the PC police. Neither will ever get my vote. I will either vote mickey mouse or stay home before I vote lesser of two evils.
For the most part, I do too. But I'd rathe vote for the lesser of two evils if I think at all that the lesser of two evils might not prevail with my vote.

Not until we take money out of politics and automatically register voting rights to all citizens [with social security numbers and birth certificates or green cards] can I say we will have an even enough playing field where I would feel comfortable casting my vote for the person I truly thought was the best candidate.
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
For the most part, I do too. But I'd rathe vote for the lesser of two evils if I think at all that the lesser of two evils might not prevail with my vote.

Not until we take money out of politics and automatically register voting rights to all citizens [with social security numbers and birth certificates or green cards] can I say we will have an even enough playing field where I would feel comfortable casting my vote for the person I truly thought was the best candidate.
Fair enough. I just will always have that Penn Jillette quote in my head

"I think voting for the lesser of two evils in game theory always leads to more evil."

Penn Jillette


Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/p/pennjillet583810.html#hyQyfV4fJuuULJx3.99

Listening to interviews with Penn, I would seriously consider voting for him if he ever ran, mad respect.
 

Antidisestablishmentarian

Well-Known Member
Fair enough. I just will always have that Penn Jillette quote in my head

"I think voting for the lesser of two evils in game theory always leads to more evil."

Penn Jillette


Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/p/pennjillet583810.html#hyQyfV4fJuuULJx3.99

Listening to interviews with Penn, I would seriously consider voting for him if he ever ran, mad respect.
He's a little crazy, but he does seem to have the ability to produce a good quote.

Penn and Tellers BS was a fun show.
 

see4

Well-Known Member

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
I tried to sit down and listen to Penn ramble. I didn't get very far.
Genius level IQ, doesn't do drugs at all but is for your individual right to do them and not get locked up for it.

The ramblings of geniuses can be hard for the slow to decipher, I get that.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
...no way I would vote for that tool,...I have as much disdain for the moral majority crowd as I do the PC police.
well we all have no doubt you are against political correctness, most klanmen like you are.

but why wouldn;t you vote for santorum?

just like rend pawl, santorum wants to keep weed illegal, ban all abortion, and outlaw gay marriage. three huge moral majority religious stances that your hero rend pawl takes as well.

santorum would be a great fit for you. like you, he also does not want to help blaaaaaaaah people.
 
Top