Should we bomb Syria to save the Syrian children?

lifegoesonbrah · Sep 3, 2013

Do you think bombing Syria more than Syria bombed itself would be good for the children of Syria?

Keep in mind the plan isn't to overthrow the regime, we just want to bomb them a couple times for warning shots.

lifegoesonbrah · Sep 3, 2013

five starred

JonnyAppleSeed420 · Sep 3, 2013

Well we should pull out all reporters from the entire region and let them at it. Its their society...let them at it I say!

Dr Kynes · Sep 3, 2013

your poll lacks the most important response option:

Fuck 'Em.

they are not a threat to anyone but themselves, let them be as retarded as they choose, but as soon as they export ONE DROP of crazy to a civilized nation, burn that desert to glass.

Harrekin · Sep 3, 2013

More bombs, show those sand-children what it means to be free!

UncleBuck · Sep 3, 2013

Dr Kynes said:
your poll lacks the most important response option:

Fuck 'Em.

they are not a threat to anyone but themselves, let them be as retarded as they choose, but as soon as they export ONE DROP of crazy to a civilized nation, burn that desert to glass.

you're right.

a nation using chemical weapons without consequences could never come back to haunt the united states or her interests.

Harrekin · Sep 3, 2013

UncleBuck said:
you're right.

a nation using chemical weapons without consequences could never come back to haunt the united states or her interests.

What would you say if it was conclusively proven that your Al Queda allies did it to incur the wrath of the US on Assad?

ChesusRice · Sep 3, 2013

Arms from all over the Middle east have been flowing to the Rebels in Syria.

What do you think Benghazi was about?

If Obama gets congressional approval we will be doing it openly and giving them better weapons.

Harrekin · Sep 3, 2013

ChesusRice said:
Arms from all over the Middle east have been flowing to the Rebels in Syria.

What do you think Benghazi was about?

If Obama gets congressional approval we will be doing it openly and giving them better weapons.

Do the American general public realise that Al Queda and their umbrella groups will be receiving direct military support from the United States at that point?

lifegoesonbrah · Sep 3, 2013

UncleBuck said:
you're right.

a nation using chemical weapons without consequences could never come back to haunt the united states or her interests.

So more bombs better for the children then?

ChesusRice · Sep 3, 2013

Harrekin said:
Do the American general public realise that Al Queda and their umbrella groups will be receiving direct military support from the United States at that point?

You mean like in Libya and Egypt?

How is that turning out for Al Qaeda?

And as to Al Qaeda, It is not really an organization anymore. Its a label.

They have a gang in New York called the Crips. Has no affiliation to the Crips in the rest of the nation, but it is scary.

We got another group called " The new Black Panthers" might of heard of them. They have nothing to do with the original Black Panthers other than they are conjured up to scare White Republicans.

Lets support Al Qaeda and then they can get slaughtered after the revolution

stoned cockatoo · Sep 3, 2013

drop children not bombs

UncleBuck · Sep 3, 2013

lifegoesonbrah said:
So more bombs better for the children then?

i don't think they keep kids in the types of military installations that will be bombed.

UncleBuck · Sep 3, 2013

Harrekin said:
What would you say if it was conclusively proven that your Al Queda allies did it to incur the wrath of the US on Assad?

yawn.

come get me when hypotheticals are no longer hypothetical.

because right now we know who carried out this attack, and it wasn't the rebels.

goblyn · Sep 3, 2013

So if it was conventional weapons, would the current administration even be discussing "action?"

Harrekin · Sep 3, 2013

UncleBuck said:
yawn.

come get me when hypotheticals are no longer hypothetical.

because right now we know who carried out this attack, and it wasn't the rebels.

Even Assads SWORN ENEMIES in Syria have come out and publicly said evidence is mounting that rebels used "kitchen Sarin" in the attack, with samples sent to Russia for analysis.

I can't wait to see how this unfolds... No offense, but I hope yous take a spanking and change course on your foreign policy.

lifegoesonbrah · Sep 3, 2013

[video=youtube;RFfnxK-YGGQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFfnxK-YGGQ[/video]

Dr Kynes · Sep 3, 2013

lifegoesonbrah said:
video snipped

not a fan of the Guro from the Hajis, nor from anybody else.

at least yours has lulzy editorial commentary.

Jimdamick · Sep 3, 2013

Welcome to the new world of democracy in Syria.

Harrekin · Sep 3, 2013

Dr Kynes said:
not a fan of the Guro from the Hajis, nor from anybody else.

at least yours has lulzy editorial commentary.

Why not flip sides, wipe out the rebels and then Assad has noone to fight so civilian stop dying.

Kill Al Queda/other Jihadists AND save civilians...

Win-win if you ask me.

Should we bomb Syria to save the Syrian children?

Should we help Syria bomb itself?

I think more bombs are going to save Syrian children

I think less bombs would be better for the children

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Similar threads