The propaganda/rhetoric and lies continue. Are they the new anti's???

It actually saddens me to continue to here the same rhetoric being slung around from profession to profession or from portfolio to portfolio,whether your discussing with the public or private sector,anything that they consider newer data,with respect to cannabis or cannabis use.
Studies such as "the developing brain" and their use of cannabis before the age of 25, a study which the author's themselves, debunked as being a misrepresentation of the data collected.
But still to this day this study is quoted over and over, and is quoted a bunch of times thru this video.

More off the mark were the addiction "experts" and their new representation of the data collected...
more specifically is a statement made at or around the "36 min. and 36 second"mark of the video.
I will leave it there for those who watch the video and would really like to hear what you thought of the legitimacy of the statement being made by this young lady.

idiot...


fuckin moron

when ya hear from drunks say that POT saved them from a life of drinking... lol

Like the title of the video says " cashing in on "
addiction specialists must be in the market for some new clients since the vast majority of their former clients would have been opiate users...
hmmm does it seem that maybe they could be a little biased towards labeling cannabis users as addicts...
sure addicts of all kinds exist....but it seems just ....like many other professions which basically had no ties to cannabis
they are jumping aboard the cannabis money train

Wow. Is this a new one? What's with this focus on the US? We have stats of our own now. For example, there hasn't been a satistically significant increase in roadside arrests since legalisation. This is in spite of the soon to be challenged law, which was ostensibly aimed at increasing the incidence of these arrests after legalisation in order to fabricate consent for the government's restrictive and exclusive system (i.e. its cronyism).