The chart shows that no matter how many restrictions you place on illegal drugs, addiction rates remain constant
Do you see that huge jump starting out in 1980? Show me a huge population jump correlating to that same time period, otherwise it is clear to anyone looking at it with an honest frame of mind, the spike in the prison population is directly attributed to the war on drugs, that point cannot be rationally argued
To the bolded: do you think for one hot second that legal or moral disapproval will dissuade a junkie?
I suggest that a big problem you've seen with the junkies you've claimed to know comes from their criminal and pariah status.
If junkies were present in society, minus BS laws and BS noses turned up on apparently religious grounds (inconsistent ones considering how you deny their humanity), they'd do a pretty good job all on their own of negatively campaigning for their lifestyles. Like drunks today, say.
Who the F` wants to allow it and then spend enormous amounts curing it ?
And it isn`t gonna cut the death rate from heroin either. That`s like giving a kid 100 dollars and sending him into a candy store expecting him to come out with one Hershey bar.
And it isn`t gonna cut the death rate from heroin either. That`s like giving a kid 100 dollars and sending him into a candy store expecting him to come out with one Hershey bar.
Why must the cure be expensive? Use alcohol as the model. Wanna be cured? Come up with the will yourself, and make use of the volunteer society that maintains itself to service that need. Straw man argument.
And this is why I am not going to argue any more. You say these wrong things and present them as fact. Do you have any objective support for these ideas?
umm, yes, it kind of would.. in fact, there is some "hot" heroin going around the north east atm.. this "hot" heroin is cut with fentanyl, which usually ends up killing the user..
if drugs like heroin were made legal, and the purity of the drug was guaranteed, then "hot" batches of drugs would be a thing of the past, and the number of od's would drop drastically..
Completely disagree. Legal access of fentanyl caused the "Hot" heroin. A buddy of mine OD from a fentanyl patch he legally acquired because he abused it. The argument of legalization leading to fewer deaths can probably be countered with some stats of OD from legally acquired pharmas.umm, yes, it kind of would.. in fact, there is some "hot" heroin going around the north east atm.. this "hot" heroin is cut with fentanyl, which usually ends up killing the user..
if drugs like heroin were made legal, and the purity of the drug was guaranteed, then "hot" batches of drugs would be a thing of the past, and the number of od's would drop drastically..
As I understand it, those nasty fucking drugs that need "processing", like heroin, coke, crack and such, are responsible for killing muldoons due to the complete lack of standardization associated with having to operate on the black market. This failure to standardize processing leads to a variety of things used to "cut" the product, which are potentially harmful in and of themselves, and it also leads to a variety of different "strengths" per dosage, including fatal "strengths". In essence, it's like pounding a beverage that one THOUGHT had the strength of say beer, but instead getting the strength of grain alcohol. That's not good.
I would rather citizens have access to products that are standardized using non-harmful processing techniques and additives, and known strength levels so there aren't any surprises...including FATAL surprises.
This is the approach Portugal took, and I believe it is a far more effective, and safer, course of action to manage drug dependency than criminalization is, has been, or ever will be.
This is one of the reasons I will NEVER make, or use, cannabis "wax", as I feel the good Lord (whoever the fuck that may be) gave us a wonderful plant to enjoy safely, and with NO need for processing...except for hash made the old school way, or with something safe like ice water.![]()
Completely disagree. Legal access of fentanyl caused the "Hot" heroin. A buddy of mine OD from a fentanyl patch he legally acquired because he abused it. The argument of legalization leading to fewer deaths can probably be countered with some stats of OD from legally acquired pharmas.
Like mentioned earlier, they will chase that high till dead. If you don`t understand "chase that high" get out of this debate.
No, we don't. Look at alcoholics. We give them the opportunities to cure themselves and keep themselves clean the moment they pony up the necessary will. This is a decision only the addict can make and enforce. It can be dirt-cheap.For heroin, you have to house them, feed them, pay employees, cloth them, do over each time they return.
Yes please! Show me a study or two.Want the proof of the candy store theory ?
and this has what relevance to drugs?....How Many kids trick or treat at one house and go home ?
Signal up your lines and pull out. I don`t say I presented anything as Fact. But if I did, I`ll back it up. You said that I did. The first sign !i
Completely disagree. Legal access of fentanyl caused the "Hot" heroin. A buddy of mine OD from a fentanyl patch he legally acquired because he abused it. The argument of legalization leading to fewer deaths can probably be countered with some stats of OD from legally acquired pharmas.
Fentanyl is only coming from one place. A script pad. (root of alot of problems imho) Nobody is growing it. Legalization is not going to all of a sudden stop sketchy ass people from doing nasty things in the name of profits.i don't think the people putting fentanyl into dope are buying patches and some how extracting the drug and putting it into the heroin.
Fentanyl is only coming from one place. A script pad. (root of alot of problems imho) Nobody is growing it. Legalization is not going to all of a sudden stop sketchy ass people from doing nasty things in the name of profits.
By the way RB, Im glad you are sober and doing well, the 13th fast approaches my friend!