Can you live on minimum wage? (Calculator)

[Pinworm]

Liberal interpretation: If it doesn't come from media matters or the democrat underground, I refused to listen.

Translating translations. Not an exercise in dumminess at all.

 

[UncleBuck]

Liberal interpretation: If it doesn't come from media matters or the democrat underground, I refused to listen.

i'm soooooooooooooo sorry for pointing out the glaringly obvious bias in your retarded source, socko McFistuptheass.

 

[UncleBuck]

When CBO has to make "assumptions that are simply not likely to happen," those assumptions are legislative. For example, CBO had to assume that all of the Bush tax cuts would expire at their legislative sunsets, even though everyone knew that some of those tax cuts would be extended. Their forecasts reflect legislative reality--"The end date of the tax cuts according to public law xxx is x"--not practical reality.

If you want to attack CBO based on its assumptions, that only makes sense when the assumptions reflect legislation they are obligated by law to follow.

i was simply pointing out how NLXSK1 takes different stances on the CBO depending on whether or not he agrees with what they have to say, and then condemns others if they do the same.

the very height of hypocrisy.

 

[Canna Sylvan]

i was simply pointing out how NLXSK1 takes different stances on the CBO depending on whether or not he agrees with what they have to say, and then condemns others if they do the same.

the very height of hypocrisy.

If everyone paid their taxes like good little boys and girls, we could pay to subsidise minimum wage workers without raising minimum wage nor more taxes.

 

[UncleBuck]

If everyone paid their taxes like good little boys and girls, we could pay to subsidise minimum wage workers without raising minimum wage nor more taxes.

only a few more weeks until oregon dispensary law goes through and i can start declaring everything like a good little boy/girl.

anything i sell will have to be tested first, the entire batch gets turned over and if the small sample they take tests bad on any metric, they destroy the whole batch. it's a big risk, but one i will gladly take.

 

[jahbrudda]

i'm soooooooooooooo sorry for pointing out the glaringly obvious bias in your retarded source, socko McFistuptheass.

You really African American buck, 4 realz?

 

[Pinworm]

only a few more weeks until oregon dispensary law goes through and i can start declaring everything like a good little boy/girl.

anything i sell will have to be tested first, the entire batch gets turned over and if the small sample they take tests bad on any metric, they destroy the whole batch. it's a big risk, but one i will gladly take.

Dispensaries are more forgiving than we would think..Couple puppy-dog hairs in the batch, no bigs - they're looking for frostiness, and density. At least in 209 they are....But, damn, what a racket. I love walking out of the shop with a huge grip of cash, and a tasty new strain to play with.... mmmmm

 

[Canna Sylvan]

You really African American buck, 4 realz?

Buck is the only black jew able to cheat his way out of a circumcision.

 

[UncleBuck]

You really African American buck, 4 realz?

i fail to see why that is even a concern of yours.

 

[Canna Sylvan]

i fail to see why that is even a concern of yours.

Never be ashamed of things you can't change.

 

[BigNBushy]

The saying goes "consider the source."

Consider, not a dispositive mental exercise.

Sure, if one has heard something that is unique and it comes from a biased source, that particular information needs to be viewed with skepticism.

However, even a broke clock is right twice a day. And of all the information on biased websites, some of it is valid. The FBI stats on a white separatist website is still data gathered by the FBI. Those numbers are beyond dispute.

Data such as this is hard to find in a source that some here would find acceptable, because any data pointing to any inferiority or negative connotations towards "protected" groups is suppressed in this country.

Just because something that is harmful to my argument comes from a source that is also opposed to my argument or philosophy does not automatically discredit it.

 

[Pinworm]

The saying goes "consider the source."

Consider, not a dispositive mental exercise.

Sure, if one has heard something that is unique and it comes from a biased source, that particular information needs to be viewed with skepticism.

However, even a broke clock is right twice a day. And of all the information on biased websites, some of it is valid. The FBI stats on a white separatist website is still data gathered by the FBI. Those numbers are beyond dispute.

Data such as this is hard to find in a source that some here would find acceptable, because any data pointing to any inferiority or negative connotations towards "protected" groups is suppressed in this country.

Just because something that is harmful to my argument comes from a source that is also opposed to my argument or philosophy does not automatically discredit it.

Way to say a bunch of stuff without saying anything....True politician. <3

 

[Padawanbater2]

Just because something that is harmful to my argument comes from a source that is also opposed to my argument or philosophy does not automatically discredit it.

HuffPost, NYT, LAT, etc..

 

[Pinworm]

CNN, Dow jones, nasdaq, pork futures....ummmm deutchmarks....Helsinki......................................I'm smart.

 

[Padawanbater2]

...reality...

 

[UncleBuck]

The FBI stats on a white separatist website is still data gathered by the FBI. Those numbers are beyond dispute.

their conclusions included "the police and courts are not biased against minorities" (LOfuckingL) and "you can best predict crime by how many blacks and hispanics are around" (LOfuckingL).

i know that since you are a white supremacist, you are kind of obligated to defend other white supremacists, but if you want to prove that you are retarded by defending such laughable and obviously false conclusions, go ahead. i can use a laugh.

 

[Dr Kynes]

You really African American buck, 4 realz?

bucky is black, jewish, chicano, gay, asian, "trangendered", taxpayer, employed, retarded, smart, rich, poor, college dropout, college graduate, intellectual, radical, or whatever special group best serves his narrative today.

he is so mature and sophisticated he can "Feel your pain" all the time, through his omniscient empathic powers.

he is chock full of Feels, and every one is deep personal and important.

 

[Doer]

You really African American buck, 4 realz?

No, but he has a stylish hair salon he might invite you to.

 

[Rob Roy]

The saying goes "consider the source."

Consider, not a dispositive mental exercise.

Sure, if one has heard something that is unique and it comes from a biased source, that particular information needs to be viewed with skepticism.

However, even a broke clock is right twice a day. And of all the information on biased websites, some of it is valid. The FBI stats on a white separatist website is still data gathered by the FBI. Those numbers are beyond dispute.

Data such as this is hard to find in a source that some here would find acceptable, because any data pointing to any inferiority or negative connotations towards "protected" groups is suppressed in this country.

Just because something that is harmful to my argument comes from a source that is also opposed to my argument or philosophy does not automatically discredit it.

My clock has two broken hands. It is not right twice a day. All of the variables should be considered is my point, so I agree with your premise.

This line makes alot of sense - Just because something that is harmful to my argument comes from a source that is also opposed to my argument or philosophy does not automatically discredit it.

 

[NoDrama]

(meaning it slopes slightly downward due to inflation)

What inflation? You can't argue there is no inflation and then report the effects of it.