UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
in this case, the citation is not necessary because your claim is patently false.Not to mention 0% of models being accurate and 0% of the dire predictions of the last 20+ years coming to pass.
<citation unecessary>
as stupid and scientifically illiterate as your claim of a 14 point romney lead, 54-40.
![](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.skepticalscience.com%2Fpics%2FHansen81ModelvsObs.jpg&hash=c744ba777af8355c7ab85bdd53b52084)
those pesky "for all" statements only need one counterexample to disprove, and i just gave you the counterexample.
you dumb shit.