Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Can you think of a valid situation where the ends justify the means?
I take the question to mean doing a wrong to produce a right , Sure it could be interpeted as legal / illegal , but in psychology sense it's all about whats ultimately right not legal.When a guard tells the house that a new inmate molested a child, and the inmates beat him to death with shower shoes!
Exactly! One man condems another to death by way of inmate! Was it right for one man to expose another, subsequently ending his life , While bringing justice to the victim?I take the question to mean doing a wrong to produce a right , Sure it could be interpeted as legal / illegal , but in psychology sense it's all about whats ultimately right not legal.
That being said the only time I could justify doing wrong would be to change a major portion of societys rule/law . to bring about a more free life , hopefully free of a tyrant
Like obama (and recent former presidents) is illegaly ruleing by executive orders , Issueing another executive order to repeal those illegal ones is illegal and even wrong on some level , but may be nessay
What ever it takes to get what I want. No holds barred.
is a law just? take for instance growing weed.. of course any weed grower thinks that the illegality of cannabis is a silly law, therefore they, i, don't have any problems breaking it..OK, so sometimes they do, sometimes they don't.
So what distinguishes between the two? What is the defining factor in deciding if they do or not?