Can coverups be covered up, legally?

[UncleBuck]

you mean like this sarcastic reply?

so the statistically higher wealth of whites is all merit based?

 

[NoDrama]

so the statistically higher wealth of whites is all merit based?

Ask your Wife, she would know, after all isn't her family wealthy and white and they got it all by managing the plantation didn't they? The fact that you knew this, embraced it and married into it says plenty. I mean you do drive a Luxury car that your Father In-Law gave to you for following him around for a few days right?

Good to know you can be so easily bought.

 

[Wavels]

nothing that you would be concerned about.

after all, eavesdropping is a good thing. until the black president does it.

if you applied the same standard to your hero bush, you'd be non-stop complaints. instead, you're a non-stop joke.

Non sequitur much?
Cover-ups???

Non responsive piffle as per usual. No surprise here.

This is about an orchestrated cover-up.
See. Easy.

 

[UncleBuck]

Ask your Wife

i'm asking you. don't weasel out like the racist cowards do.

 

[UncleBuck]

Non sequitur much?

not at all.

if you applied the same standard to the 13 or so embassy attacks under bush, you'd find plenty to manufacture a scandal about. but you don't apply the same standard, as has been illustrated by your rapidly shifting views on anything the black president does that the white one did as well.

 

[Doer]

so the statistically higher wealth of whites is all merit based?

No, the whites took advantage of all the races they came across. The races like our money that we got by taking advantage of the races.

The DEMS and PUBS just carry on.

 

[NoDrama]

so the statistically higher wealth of whites is all merit based?

Yes Buck, the reason whites have become wealthy is because they currently own slaves. Just look at all the slaves you yourself own.

 

[UncleBuck]

Yes Buck, the reason whites have become wealthy is because they currently own slaves. Just look at all the slaves you yourself own.

it's useless to try to point out facts to people whose worldview depends on denying those facts.

by the way, your family wouldn't own that farm. even after blacks got the right to own property, they were zoned out by localities all over.

 

[NoDrama]

it's useless to try to point out facts to people whose worldview depends on denying those facts.

by the way, your family wouldn't own that farm. even after blacks got the right to own property, they were zoned out by localities all over.

Huh? Sorry I don't speak gibberish. If you were trying to make a point it was lost in that garbage you call a sentence.

 

[UncleBuck]

Huh? Sorry I don't speak gibberish. If you were trying to make a point it was lost in that garbage you call a sentence.

like i said, they will tune out anything contrary to their preconceived worldviews.

they will alter reality in their minds rather than alter their worldviews based on reality. studies show this is how conservatives think (if you can even call it thinking).

 

[Wavels]

not at all.

if you applied the same standard to the 13 or so embassy attacks under bush, you'd find plenty to manufacture a scandal about. but you don't apply the same standard, as has been illustrated by your rapidly shifting views on anything the black president does that the white one did as well.

Just how many of the 13 embassy attacks under Bush were falsely attributed to a video?
See. Big Difference.

And the most amazing thing is that the current Administration could have been more forthright about the true nature of the attack with the American people back in September '12. They chose not to do so.
If they told the truth from the beginning, we would not be talking about Benghazi at all now.

 

[greenlikemoney]

I believe at this point in the conversation Uncle Buck will want to change the subject to Trayvon Martin or something similar. Bucky, you should look up the definition of "sociopath" because when you do, you will be very surprised they have replaced the definition with a picture of you.

 

[Wavels]

I believe at this point in the conversation Uncle Buck will want to change the subject to Trayvon Martin or something similar. Bucky, you should look up the definition of "sociopath" because when you do, you will be very surprised they have replaced the definition with a picture of you.

Or he will commence another maniacal and frenzied exhumation of long dead threads.
A truly bizarre fit of pique.
In a way I sort of feel sorry for the Merry Buckster.

 

[Doer]

Or he will commence another maniacal and frenzied exhumation of long dead threads.
A truly bizarre fit of pique.
In a way I sort of feel sorry for the Merry Buckster.

Oh I don't. He is projecting his transference and gets good learning from that, I hope.

 

[greenlikemoney]

Or he will commence another maniacal and frenzied exhumation of long dead threads.
A truly bizarre fit of pique.
In a way I sort of feel sorry for the Merry Buckster.

Oh, I don't feel sorry for him at all. However, I DO feel sorry for any human being who has to share his air space on a daily basis.

 

[UncleBuck]

the current Administration could have been more forthright about the true nature of the attack with the American people back in September '12. They chose not to do so.

says the guy who is on record applauding the iraq invasion because "we had to do it to save american lives".

some selective outrage you have there.

 

[NoDrama]

Just how many of the 13 embassy attacks under Bush were falsely attributed to a video?
See. Big Difference.

And the most amazing thing is that the current Administration could have been more forthright about the true nature of the attack with the American people back in September '12. They chose not to do so.
If they told the truth from the beginning, we would not be talking about Benghazi at all now.

Better yet, how many of those 13 attacks were forewarned of and could have been totally avoided?

Benghazi is really about Libya, have you seen what has happened there? Its become a safe haven for al quaida and is turned into a divided country run by warlords. i.e. another Somalia in the making.

Want to buy some black market Surface to Air Missiles? Libya. Benghazi was the middle man for the CIA to sell these weapons to Libyan based terror cells.

 

[UncleBuck]

Better yet, how many of those 13 attacks were forewarned of

and could have been totally avoided?

but hey, 7000+ american lives < 4 american lives

 

[NoDrama]

but hey, 7000+ american lives < 4 american lives

That says nothing about any of the embassy attacks where no us diplomats got hurt at all

Why you bringing up Bush anyway? Does that somehow mean its ok for Obama to let people get killed so that its easier to start a war?

Is it ok for you to kill someone just because Son of Sam did? Your logic is ludicrous. You cannot hope to make Obama look better by showing us how bad Bush was, all you are doing is confirming for all of us that Obama is just Like Bush, but because he has a D next to his name you are willing to look the other way and only see the accomplishments. Bush was a piece of shit president, but Obama is no better, thanks for pointing that out.

 

[Doer]

says the guy who is on record applauding the iraq invasion because "we had to do it to save american lives".

some selective outrage you have there.

You are so corny. No one has any outrage but you. And it may get worse before it gets better.