rob's entire philosophy depends on historical revisionism so severe that it is outright historical denialism.
he denies that those racist practices he defends endlessly caused harm.
how can anyone deny that those racist practices caused harm? they can't. but if your entire failed philosophy hinges on that simple little fact, you have to just block it out.
robroy is an old racist clown.
Your method of refutation relies heavily on insults and is short on rebuttal and addressing questions. The fact is you CAN'T deny that you advocate the initiation of aggression in some instances against people that simply do not want to associate with others.
You've tried long and hard to dance away from that, but it is clearly your position. My position is people should not force themselves on others, your position is the opposite.
I do not defend racist practices that cause an actionable harm. I do not like racist beliefs as I find them ignorant. I think there is a significant difference between an act of wanting to disassociate and an act that forces association. You ignore those differences and run from discussion of it.
However a person can believe what they want to, even a racist and I will not try to stop them if they confine their idiocy to their own property. You, like a prohibitionist, think it is your job to use force and go to peoples property and make them do things they prefer not to do. That's the business model of the DEA.
I defend the idea that all people that own something have the right to control it as long as enjoying that control does not take away the right of another person from controlling things that they own. You like to build mountains of shit and try to plant my flag in it....that's because you're a weak debater.
If you want to be a master debater you should take the gerbil out and get some lubricant...focus on the man side of your torso and let go those funny feelings you have for small rodents.
