abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
The fact is that private interests are behind Orwellian state.
Government is more efficient than a privatized state.
I never said anything about support for government.
You're asking for a definition of anarchosyndicalism or of anarchocommunism as a deflection. That is what your question about property amounts to.
Notice two things here. I'm not promoting any specific philosophy. I will only go so far as to say which utopian philosophy steers my thinking. The other thing to notice is that I have never asked you to define your philosophy. I went and learned about it before I started criticizing it.
You started pushing your ideas, got shot down and deflected by asking for a definition of private property.
I was at one time planning to define property and to describe anarchist philosophy for the forum, but I refuse. I am not pushing the idea. If you don't like me criticizing yours, don't push it.
The fact is that private interests are behind Orwellian state.
They own the government.
The government exists to serve the ruling class and protect private property. You came into the thread to blame the government. That is like fish blaming the fishing pole.
Seriously??? Citation needed. Government is one of the most wasteful un-accountable groups on the planet. Why do you need efficiency when you have monopoly??? You are very confused.Government is more efficient than a privatized state.
You mistake "gov't is more efficient than a privatized state" with "gov't is efficient".Seriously??? Citation needed. Government is one of the most wasteful un-accountable groups on the planet. Why do you need efficiency when you have monopoly??? You are very confused.
Bertrand RussellA stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand.
Our government is the antithesis of efficient...You mistake "gov't is more efficient than a privatized state" with "gov't is efficient".
Bertrand Russell
You have no fucking clue what I'm talking about. Absolutely no idea. You want to argue about how the gov't is behind all our woes though don't you?Our government is the antithesis of efficient...
I am not sure about which hypothetical construct you are speaking but if you can provide a real life example of government being efficient and more efficient than "a privatized state" I am interested to hear it...
It is behind most of them. I dont need to argue about it.You have no fucking clue what I'm talking about. Absolutely no idea. You want to argue about how the gov't is behind all our woes though don't you?
Were you born retarded?It is behind most of them. I dont need to argue about it.
Why did you purposely avoid my question? I thought that you would be happy to provide a clear example of the efficiency you were citing. I honestly asked for a citation and you just want to argue with me. So, do you have an actual real life example of the efficiency you referred to??
You are comparing one broken system to a system that is more broken and telling the reader they can only pick from either of the horrible choices.You mistake "gov't is more efficient than a privatized state" with "gov't is efficient".
No.You are comparing one broken system to a system that is more broken and telling the reader they can only pick from either...
If the government did not have so much power and control over every aspect of our lives it might not be worth owning... However, chicken and the egg have grown it to be something that needs to be manipulated to tilt the system in *your* favor.No.
I'm blaming the people who own the government actually.
medicare's administrative costs are far, far lower than private insurance.if you can provide a real life example of government being efficient and more efficient than "a privatized state" I am interested to hear it...