Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
It looks like the stick people made an agreement absent coercion.
Doesn't Communism rely on force and coercion?
Teacher fired for breaking up fight.
- Thread starter ginwilly
- Start date
It looks like the stick people made an agreement absent coercion.
Doesn't Communism rely on force and coercion?
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Who owns the gas station? the racist, the black guy or the government ? Stop eating crayons, they are toxic.
Ra$p0tin
Well-Known Member
Sure you can, place it in a pan and fry it.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Context my dear boy, context.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Democracy right there.
Doer
Well-Known Member
Feeeeeedoooooooommmmm! <gul>
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
[QUOTETE="Rob Roy, post: 10510138, member: 101799"]My perspective is that you should be free to do what you want...[/QUOTE]
No.
You keep dropping shit like this and "oh but muh non-aggression principal" but you clearly fail to see that in a system where natural resources are privately owned, people will have the power to coerce others. This requires force. This subjugates the vast majority of the population to the whim an ever shrinking few.
In such a feudalist system, the goad exists for people to rent themselves out as labor to a ruling class which creates no wealth, since labor creates all wealth.
To answer your question, yes, I advocate violence against oppressors. However, I scoff at your phrase "non initiation of force" as enabling to structural violence. I do wish to see an uprising wherein the ruling class is removed by force and if they try to keep power over the masses by the use of force which they are very much prepared to do, then violence ought to befall them.
No.
You keep dropping shit like this and "oh but muh non-aggression principal" but you clearly fail to see that in a system where natural resources are privately owned, people will have the power to coerce others. This requires force. This subjugates the vast majority of the population to the whim an ever shrinking few.
In such a feudalist system, the goad exists for people to rent themselves out as labor to a ruling class which creates no wealth, since labor creates all wealth.
To answer your question, yes, I advocate violence against oppressors. However, I scoff at your phrase "non initiation of force" as enabling to structural violence. I do wish to see an uprising wherein the ruling class is removed by force and if they try to keep power over the masses by the use of force which they are very much prepared to do, then violence ought to befall them.
What if the racist wasn't forceful and politely refused service?
tekdc911
Well-Known Member
ya that ^
and about the OP
teacher should of just tazerd them ..................... A broom is hard core .........
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Both are non lethal forms of separating protagonists...
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
that was stated in the question, which you once again refuse to answer because you are a racist coward. let me repeat it for you.
let's do a more concrete example that goes specifically to what we are talking about.
a racist opens up a gas station and tells the public "come buy gas here".
a black guy goes to the gas station and says "i would like to buy some gas here".
the racist gets hostile and forcefully removes the black person from his property.
who initiated the aggression?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
how would a racist like you go about "politely" telling a black person that they were not welcome to buy gas at your gas station because they were black?
tell us more about this "polite" racism that you espouse.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
...Except that's not what happened...
The racist didn't tell the public "come buy gas here". He excluded some people from his offer, he's a racist remember? The statists coercives were the ones that told the public, "don't worry, this racist dick doesn't REALLY own the gas station, we do".
You sure have a problem starting at the beginning don't you?
I'm not defending a racist initiating aggression. You are defending a statist coercive initiating aggression.
Had the racist dick left his property and attempted to control another person off his property he would have been the one initiating aggression.
You still have a rodent in your pants.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
No.
You keep dropping shit like this and "oh but muh non-aggression principal" but you clearly fail to see that in a system where natural resources are privately owned, people will have the power to coerce others. This requires force. This subjugates the vast majority of the population to the whim an ever shrinking few.
In such a feudalist system, the goad exists for people to rent themselves out as labor to a ruling class which creates no wealth, since labor creates all wealth.
To answer your question, yes, I advocate violence against oppressors. However, I scoff at your phrase "non initiation of force" as enabling to structural violence. I do wish to see an uprising wherein the ruling class is removed by force and if they try to keep power over the masses by the use of force which they are very much prepared to do, then violence ought to befall them.[/QUOTE]
Are you saying all natural resources should not be owned, most or some ?
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Doer
Well-Known Member
Polite Racism is an institution in the USA, It is in the form of PC pass for all but bigotry against brown. It is code word, Chomski speak of the "disadvantaged" and the victims of poverty., Then, all the while, doing everything possible to keep that poverty going, as a prime voting pool.
And here is how it works if the tables were turned.
- please sir we just need a little gas to get us over to the cocktail party.....
- yes we have two cars but we just cleaned this one
- no we didn't remember to get gas when we cleaned the car
Now the polite racism part.
"Get yo dumb, honky asses off my property, I don't have any gas for your kind."
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
if the racist didn't open the gas station to sell gas to the public, then why didn't they just switch over to a private membership model after civil rights was instituted, so that they could continue to "own themselves" and keep "associating" with only those they wished to associate with?
your entire philosophy depends on outright denial of history, again and again and again. it's why you run away from answering simple questions like the little racist coward that you are.
Doer
Well-Known Member
I just saw the baseball story of Jackie Robinson.
Polite Racist says: Now boy, come on away from there. You know I can't let you in that white's bathroom.
Robinson: Where is the black's?
PR: aH well, we don't have one.
R: Hey Charlie, how much gas did you say this big old school bus can carry?
C: A hunerd gallons, Jackie.
R: OK, put that hose back, Mr Gas Station. We can pay our good money somewhere else.
PR: (turns red and looks around) I'm putting in a whole hunerd gallons, by God. (Turns away)...mutters, Go on then.
Polite Racist says: Now boy, come on away from there. You know I can't let you in that white's bathroom.
Robinson: Where is the black's?
PR: aH well, we don't have one.
R: Hey Charlie, how much gas did you say this big old school bus can carry?
C: A hunerd gallons, Jackie.
R: OK, put that hose back, Mr Gas Station. We can pay our good money somewhere else.
PR: (turns red and looks around) I'm putting in a whole hunerd gallons, by God. (Turns away)...mutters, Go on then.
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
This is all the proof people need to see your angle buck.
The racist that opened up the gas station is a black man. The black fellow that entered was known to hit on this guy`s wife. No racism at all dude.
See your concrete story is full of holes and your dam leaks.
You are a motivated blabber mouth driven by a fetish that believes only White on Black is racist.
Not one day goes by that you do not type racist or label someone a racist.
Are you making amends for your past or something ? You can`t stay away from the racist topic.
The only thing a reader could conclude is that buck hates White people.
Concrete story.....OK Bucky !i
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
are you saying that anti-racist is really just code for anti-white?